ImageImage

Royal Ivey Commentary (Costanza reference)

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,521
And1: 29,523
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Royal Ivey Commentary (Costanza reference) 

Post#1 » by paulpressey25 » Wed Mar 5, 2008 4:00 am

Ty's blog had this blurb on Ivey I thought was great. Unfortunately I'm coming around to the same opinion.

The Ivey illusion

"Full of sound and fury signifying nothing."

Royal Ivey is constantly getting praised by the Bucks television announcers, but when you look at his statistics after the game, they inevitably stink. I think I figured out the disconnect.

Remember the episode on Seinfeld when Costanza revealed his trick for seeming busy at his Yankee job when in fact he wasn't doing anything? He said he would make "stressed out" noises and gestures, like sighing loudly or grimacing, and whenever he did his boss Wilhelm would think he was actually getting something accomplished.

I think that's what happens with Royal Ivey. Everything he does looks difficult. He looks so active on defense, which leads to observations like "Tenacious defense from Royal Ivey!" But then his man scores on him at will.

Or he'll doing things like making a bounce pass while falling down, which he did last night. "What a pass by Ivey!" the announcers proclaimed. But it wasn't that great a pass... its just that he made it look more difficult than it was by losing his balance.


Fam's blog is good, this guy's is also worthwhile.....

http://www.bucksdiary.blogspot.com/
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 39,434
And1: 11,237
Joined: May 12, 2002

 

Post#2 » by midranger » Wed Mar 5, 2008 4:05 am

Ivey is the most overhyped defender this side of Charlie Bell. No one on our team keeps their man in front of them on the perimeter.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,685
And1: 27,269
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#3 » by trwi7 » Wed Mar 5, 2008 4:06 am

Completely agree with that. He may be our best perimeter defender but does that say much of anything? He's not really good at anything.

Honestly, Atlanta's PG problems were well documented do you think they would've played Ivey more than 10 minutes per game if they thought he was good? Do you think the Bucks would've gotten him for the minimum if other teams thought he was good?
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
REDDzone
RealGM
Posts: 30,209
And1: 5,132
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
 

 

Post#4 » by REDDzone » Wed Mar 5, 2008 4:13 am

I have been saying for awhile that guys like Royal, Bell, and Skinner only look good because they are average defenders on a horrible defensive team.

There aren't very many guards who could back up the Bucks defensive duo and not look at least passable on that side of the court.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 39,434
And1: 11,237
Joined: May 12, 2002

 

Post#5 » by midranger » Wed Mar 5, 2008 4:26 am

In searching the blogs listed on that posted site, I think I came across a prime europa candidate. In a game where Redd misses a(nother) clutch FT for the tie, and Bogut blows a 1 foot layup, who do you blame?

"Who Lost the Spurs Game
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
User avatar
THE DINJ
Starter
Posts: 2,005
And1: 121
Joined: Jun 25, 2006
Location: Madison, WI
   

 

Post#6 » by THE DINJ » Wed Mar 5, 2008 4:36 am

That episode was literally just playing as I was reading this post.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,752
And1: 6,957
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

 

Post#7 » by LUKE23 » Wed Mar 5, 2008 4:56 am

Ironically, that was the episode that was on tonight. Funny.
fam3381
General Manager
Posts: 7,576
And1: 174
Joined: Jun 07, 2005
Location: Austin

 

Post#8 » by fam3381 » Wed Mar 5, 2008 4:23 pm

Can we please start calling Ivey "Costanza"? I would love nothing more than to hear people yell "COOOO-stanza!" at the BC. Let's make this happen.

Brett at the Bratwurst has long been critical of Ivey as well...that he has a good defensive stance and looks like he's trying, so people assume he's actually a good defender when he gets beaten all the time.

He seems to foul guys an awful lot...the numbers say at a higher rate than Mo/Bell at least (insert joke about Mo never getting close enough to even foul guys).
Retired Bucks blogger. Occasional Bucks podcaster.
msiris
RealGM
Posts: 10,982
And1: 2,249
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
Location: Central Wisconsin

 

Post#9 » by msiris » Wed Mar 5, 2008 4:42 pm

Sad when the rest of the team makes him look good. :nonono: :banghead:
Ride the tank
User avatar
unklchuk
Head Coach
Posts: 6,141
And1: 94
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

 

Post#10 » by unklchuk » Wed Mar 5, 2008 4:55 pm

I was saying the same thing recently. That his defense looked active and concentrated, but didn't accomplish much. That he had no assists in his 20 minutes.
AFAIK, IDKM
User avatar
BobbyLight
RealGM
Posts: 10,027
And1: 1,546
Joined: Jul 29, 2004
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Contact:
 

 

Post#11 » by BobbyLight » Wed Mar 5, 2008 4:55 pm

I've been thinking this for a while. Ivey kept getting all this praise from Jim and John and we even had a few here who loved him. The guy isn't good at anything. Being the best defender on the Bucks is like being the prettiest Energee dancer. Stick around with a bunch of pigs and you are bound to stand out while being mediocre.
Matt Foley
Banned User
Posts: 400
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 14, 2008

 

Post#12 » by Matt Foley » Wed Mar 5, 2008 5:54 pm

is that the episode where he is yelling yankee bastards
User avatar
jerrod
RealGM
Posts: 34,178
And1: 133
Joined: Aug 31, 2003
Location: The Berkeley of the midwest/ born with the intent/ to distress any government/ right of the left
     

 

Post#13 » by jerrod » Wed Mar 5, 2008 6:22 pm

midranger wrote:In searching the blogs listed on that posted site, I think I came across a prime europa candidate. In a game where Redd misses a(nother) clutch FT for the tie, and Bogut blows a 1 foot layup, who do you blame?

"Who Lost the Spurs Game
User avatar
BlueJeep
Junior
Posts: 445
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 15, 2007
Location: I Am a Witness

Re: Royal Ivey Commentary (Costanza reference) 

Post#14 » by BlueJeep » Wed Mar 5, 2008 10:28 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:Ty's blog had this blurb on Ivey I thought was great. Unfortunately I'm coming around to the same opinion.

The Ivey illusion

"Full of sound and fury signifying nothing."

Royal Ivey is constantly getting praised by the Bucks television announcers, but when you look at his statistics after the game, they inevitably stink. I think I figured out the disconnect.

Remember the episode on Seinfeld when Costanza revealed his trick for seeming busy at his Yankee job when in fact he wasn't doing anything? He said he would make "stressed out" noises and gestures, like sighing loudly or grimacing, and whenever he did his boss Wilhelm would think he was actually getting something accomplished.

I think that's what happens with Royal Ivey. Everything he does looks difficult. He looks so active on defense, which leads to observations like "Tenacious defense from Royal Ivey!" But then his man scores on him at will.

Or he'll doing things like making a bounce pass while falling down, which he did last night. "What a pass by Ivey!" the announcers proclaimed. But it wasn't that great a pass... its just that he made it look more difficult than it was by losing his balance.


Fam's blog is good, this guy's is also worthwhile.....

http://www.bucksdiary.blogspot.com/



This just isnt fair. Anyone would look bad on defesne coming in the game to replace "lock down" defenders like Redd and Mo :lol:
Im ruff around the edges like a thug with elegance
The world needs to get up off my nuts cuz everybody actin like some elephants

Buck the World

I have a Ruben Patterson sized man crush on Brandon Jennings
aboveAverage
RealGM
Posts: 10,976
And1: 2,905
Joined: Mar 25, 2006
 

 

Post#15 » by aboveAverage » Wed Mar 5, 2008 10:52 pm

I disagree. Royal Ivey is refreshing to watch on the court. He is a good defender, and he is the only guard on this team that can stay in front of his man, and actually tries to stay in front of his man. If anything, Ivey's problem is that he tries too hard on defense, because he constantly gets silly reach in fouls. However, I love his intensity. He is a good ballhandler, and can even make the jump shot fairly consistently. He is always active on the defensive end. I don't think we should take anything away from him.
User avatar
Buck You
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,555
And1: 541
Joined: Jul 24, 2006
Location: Illinois
     

 

Post#16 » by Buck You » Wed Mar 5, 2008 11:45 pm

The thing is, Royal Ivey has to play defense to even be useful on the court and he doesn't even play it that well. Add to the fact that he shoots way too damn much and he is pretty useless out there.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 101,880
And1: 54,997
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

 

Post#17 » by MickeyDavis » Thu Mar 6, 2008 1:08 am

midranger wrote:In searching the blogs listed on that posted site, I think I came across a prime europa candidate. In a game where Redd misses a(nother) clutch FT for the tie, and Bogut blows a 1 foot layup, who do you blame?

"Who Lost the Spurs Game
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 39,434
And1: 11,237
Joined: May 12, 2002

 

Post#18 » by midranger » Thu Mar 6, 2008 1:46 am

By Mennen.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
raleigh
Head Coach
Posts: 6,286
And1: 601
Joined: Oct 23, 2004

 

Post#19 » by raleigh » Thu Mar 6, 2008 1:50 am

That is SUCH an accurate description of Ivey as a Hawk.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks