Terry Stotts, IMO, was a realist as coach. He had a mediocre team (not as good as we thought) and he coached it to give the best mediocre results. At the time, I thought that was inadequate. Thought him an engineer as a coach, not a leader. Leaders are comparatively rare - and in the NBA a leader coach is rarer still.
Nevertheless, that's what Milwaukee needs.
Enlund on LK, basically just more rationalization
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
-
Bucks_Revenge
- Banned User
- Posts: 7,978
- And1: 1
- Joined: Oct 13, 2004
looking back and evaluating Stotts he has proved that he is a great assistant coach and a great x's and o's guy but he is not a leader and not a coach that can gain respect from the players.....after the 2002 season the move that could of saved the franchise was fire Karl and hire Stotts......the players on that team respected Stotts they would of played for him.....
Re: Enlund on LK, basically just more rationalization
-
trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,685
- And1: 27,269
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Enlund on LK, basically just more rationalization
NotYoAvgNBAFan wrote:More bullslut excuses...Other coaches had them too!
NotYoAvgNBAFan wrote:A new system my assets
NotYoAvgNBAFan wrote:That is utter bullsnap.
NotYoAvgNBAFan wrote:If Riley had not got rid of Posey, Payton, Jones and Walker the Heat would be a contender still.
All sig worthy.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.