ImageImage

Bill Simmons:Yi=Biggest Rookie Bust

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
smauss
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,733
And1: 432
Joined: Jul 23, 2005
Contact:
     

 

Post#101 » by smauss » Sat Apr 19, 2008 7:35 pm

midranger wrote:Yi displaced the former starter so he was allowed to play his natural position.

Bogut got eaten alive by the likes of David Harrison, so the Bucks had to make a move such that he wouldn't humiliate himself when the real season started. That's how he got to PF.


:lol:
"Too many people ask for help, and sometimes you have to help yourself." - Jerry Sloan (CBQ is missed)

simul justus et peccator
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 39,436
And1: 11,241
Joined: May 12, 2002

 

Post#102 » by midranger » Sat Apr 19, 2008 7:39 pm

I'm assuming that was an attempt at sarcasm, but if you point out where I was being dishonest or mistaken I'd appreciate it.

The Bucks getting Magloire was a direct response to Bogut being nowhere close to being able to handle NBA centers. Not even in Summer League or Preseason atmospheres.

I'm guessing moving Bogut to PF was about the last thing anyone in the organization wanted or expected.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
User avatar
smauss
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,733
And1: 432
Joined: Jul 23, 2005
Contact:
     

 

Post#103 » by smauss » Sat Apr 19, 2008 8:20 pm

midranger wrote:I'm assuming that was an attempt at sarcasm, but if you point out where I was being dishonest or mistaken I'd appreciate it.

The Bucks getting Magloire was a direct response to Bogut being nowhere close to being able to handle NBA centers. Not even in Summer League or Preseason atmospheres.

I'm guessing moving Bogut to PF was about the last thing anyone in the organization wanted or expected.


Mid, I'm not saying that Bogut was coming into the league being able to play center for major minutes or not get schooled as all rookies do. I'm also not saying you are being dishonest, I just am amused at the blatant hate you have for Bogut. I merely stated that Bogut wasn't playing his natural position his rookie season and Yi did. To me, Bogut even being considered able to play the 4 says much his ability. How well could Yi play center? Now before you go ballistic on how poorly played the 4 I won't argue that he did play the position well but he played it like 43% of the time and was serviceable. IMHO, it was a lousy one year experiment that didn't work. So, I guess if he wasn't close to being an NBA center as a rook, he must have progress significantly to be starting at center the following year.
"Too many people ask for help, and sometimes you have to help yourself." - Jerry Sloan (CBQ is missed)

simul justus et peccator
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 39,436
And1: 11,241
Joined: May 12, 2002

 

Post#104 » by midranger » Sat Apr 19, 2008 8:38 pm

It wasn't so much his progress as it was him bitching until Magloire was traded, that landed him the starting center role in year 2.

I don't hate Bogut at all. I'm being honest. I just think people have some VERY selective memory on Andrew Bogut's exploits as a Buck so far.

Year 1 went like this:

Destroyed in Summer League and Preseason. Looked way in over his head. Bucks panic and trade for Magloire. Bogut starts at PF. Coach doesn't believe he's ready for that role and places him on the bench in favor of Joe Smith. Coach told that this is unacceptable and Bogut is moved back into the starting 5. Bogut is a solid rebounder and finisher early on. His second second game was a 17 rebound effort IIRC. He hits a couple huge shots against the Spurs and Sixers, comes up with a big block against the Mavs. He gradually fades as he hits his own rookie wall. By the end of the year, he's quitting in playoff games.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
User avatar
smauss
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,733
And1: 432
Joined: Jul 23, 2005
Contact:
     

 

Post#105 » by smauss » Sat Apr 19, 2008 9:06 pm

midranger wrote:
I just think people have some VERY selective memory on Andrew Bogut's exploits as a Buck so far.


Agreed Mid.
"Too many people ask for help, and sometimes you have to help yourself." - Jerry Sloan (CBQ is missed)

simul justus et peccator
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

 

Post#106 » by europa » Sat Apr 19, 2008 10:29 pm

smauss wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



At least Yi was playing his natural position.....


And as I said before while Bogut had some rough moments in the second half of his rookie season, he didn't spend 2-3 months being one of the worst players in the entire league. HUGE difference between his rookie season and Yi's.
Nothing will not break me.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 62,809
And1: 41,140
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

 

Post#107 » by emunney » Sat Apr 19, 2008 10:53 pm

midranger wrote:It wasn't so much his progress as it was him bitching until Magloire was traded, that landed him the starting center role in year 2.

I don't hate Bogut at all. I'm being honest. I just think people have some VERY selective memory on Andrew Bogut's exploits as a Buck so far.

Year 1 went like this:

Destroyed in Summer League and Preseason. Looked way in over his head. Bucks panic and trade for Magloire. Bogut starts at PF. Coach doesn't believe he's ready for that role and places him on the bench in favor of Joe Smith. Coach told that this is unacceptable and Bogut is moved back into the starting 5. Bogut is a solid rebounder and finisher early on. His second second game was a 17 rebound effort IIRC. He hits a couple huge shots against the Spurs and Sixers, comes up with a big block against the Mavs. He gradually fades as he hits his own rookie wall. By the end of the year, he's quitting in playoff games.


I remember it going more like:

* Joe Smith to start
* Joe Smith's knee won't stop swelling up every time he steps foot on the practice floor
* Joe Smith starts the season inactive
* Bogut starts
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

 

Post#108 » by europa » Sat Apr 19, 2008 11:03 pm

emunney wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I remember it going more like:

* Joe Smith to start
* Joe Smith's knee won't stop swelling up every time he steps foot on the practice floor
* Joe Smith starts the season inactive
* Bogut starts


I also recall Smith being hurt and the Bucks having only Bogut and Gadz in the frontcourt. And with Gadz being Gadz, Harris couldn't just sit back and do nothing. Magloire was the best frontcourt player available at the time and so Harris made the move. The alternative was to give 30 minutes a game to Gadz and while Harris made the foolish decision to massively overpay for Gadz, he did have the smarts to realize quickly that giving Gadz heavy minutes wasn't the smart move to make.
Nothing will not break me.
User avatar
wireonfire
Junior
Posts: 432
And1: 1
Joined: May 20, 2007

 

Post#109 » by wireonfire » Sun Apr 20, 2008 6:57 am

One thing people all forgot is that how hard it is for foreign players (not including those who played college ball here) to adjust to the style of the NBA.

If you check the 1st year stats of the star international players in the NBA, not many had better numbers than Yi did. Ginobilli came as 25 years old rookie and averaged 7 pts in his 1st year.

It is simply too early to call Yi a bust at this point. Let's decide it after next season.

Simmons is a joke, he predicted Yao a bust too.
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,066
And1: 14,932
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

 

Post#110 » by Ayt » Sun Apr 20, 2008 8:56 am

wireonfire wrote:One thing people all forgot is that how hard it is for foreign players (not including those who played college ball here) to adjust to the style of the NBA.

If you check the 1st year stats of the star international players in the NBA, not many had better numbers than Yi did. Ginobilli came as 25 years old rookie and averaged 7 pts in his 1st year.

It is simply too early to call Yi a bust at this point. Let's decide it after next season.

Simmons is a joke, he predicted Yao a bust too.


And don't forget Bogut. He blasted him pre and post draft.

I think people too easily forget your main point. Gasol is really the only foreign player off the top of my head that came in and played at a high level right away.

Yao is a freakin 7-6, 300+ pound beast with skills and even he had a long adjustment period.

Next year and the year after are key for Yi. We saw the type of leap Bogut took in the second half of year three. Year two and to a greater extent year three are when you really find out what you have, at least for normal human basketball prospects (guys like Lebron, Paul, etc. being the exceptions).

International prospects, especially those coming from backwater basketball territories like China, are basically like HS prospects. All you hope for is flashes of greatness early and then you hope everything starts to come together in year 2 and year 3.
User avatar
teamny1
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,434
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 22, 2005

 

Post#111 » by teamny1 » Sun Apr 20, 2008 12:37 pm

Simmons in a recent column still stated that if Jay Williams didn't get hurt he'd be a better player than Yao. Basically saying he'd be a top 5 player. Obviously Simmons has a problem admitting he's wrong and when he does just slips in a "as always I'm an idiot" comment like he's just joking the whole time. If either Yi or Bogut ever become All-Star type talents he'll just state "well Bogut was the 1st overall pick of course he should be, yet he's still worse than Deron Williams/Chris Paul so I'm still right" or that Yi should have been playing better earlier or some other nonsense.

Just the fact that he seems legitimately pissed that the Bucks didn't offer him a GM job and he seriously thinks he's cut out for a GM job shows how big his head has gotten.
LISTEN2JAZZ
RealGM
Posts: 13,295
And1: 196
Joined: Feb 21, 2005
Location: Madison
 

 

Post#112 » by LISTEN2JAZZ » Sun Apr 20, 2008 12:38 pm

Ayt wrote:International prospects, especially those coming from backwater basketball territories like China, are basically like HS prospects.
Except that with HS players, they take three years to develop, and then you can get 10 years of prime out of them from age 21-31.

If Yi takes 3 years to develop, we may only get 5 years of solid production out of him afterward.
User avatar
Neapolitan Buck
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,762
And1: 0
Joined: May 27, 2007
Location: Naples, Italy

 

Post#113 » by Neapolitan Buck » Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:07 pm

Don't forget that Yi and all the international rookies play about 40 games a year, an 82-game regular season is tough for this guys who need a couple of years to adapt.
LISTEN2JAZZ
RealGM
Posts: 13,295
And1: 196
Joined: Feb 21, 2005
Location: Madison
 

 

Post#114 » by LISTEN2JAZZ » Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:10 pm

Neapolitan Buck wrote:Don't forget that Yi and all the international rookies play about 40 games a year, an 82-game regular season is tough for this guys who need a couple of years to adapt.
I don't think that's true. Yi was playing year round, was he not?
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,523
And1: 29,525
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

 

Post#115 » by paulpressey25 » Sun Apr 20, 2008 3:32 pm

Ayt wrote: International prospects, especially those coming from backwater basketball territories like China, are basically like HS prospects..


This is probably the best defense I've seen of Yi. I can intellectually buy into this premise despite my gut concern of how badly Yi finished the year.
User avatar
redred9
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,356
And1: 66
Joined: Apr 01, 2008
Location: Sydney & Toronto
     

 

Post#116 » by redred9 » Sun Apr 20, 2008 7:11 pm

yep. Ive watched a lot (probably more than NBA) of international ball in my time, and it is played in such a different manner to the NBA, which is all one on one mismatches, quick reaction speeds and specialty skills. It takes awhile for foreign guys to learn this game. I think sometimes when you see a foreign guy bomb out in the NBA, its because they dont really have anything theyre 'specialized' in, theyre just good at a lot of different things- which is the way they're taught. Its like Team USA getting whupped in international tournaments, but the other way around.

I like both styles, but the adjustment period is there for sure. Give Yi a chance, i think.
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,066
And1: 14,932
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

 

Post#117 » by Ayt » Mon Apr 21, 2008 2:02 am

adamcz wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Except that with HS players, they take three years to develop, and then you can get 10 years of prime out of them from age 21-31.

If Yi takes 3 years to develop, we may only get 5 years of solid production out of him afterward.


True, but if you think he has the chance to be an elite player and the other guys available have lower ceilings you take him anyway, provided you are assuming he's not 20.
User avatar
wireonfire
Junior
Posts: 432
And1: 1
Joined: May 20, 2007

 

Post#118 » by wireonfire » Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:28 am

adamcz wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

I don't think that's true. Yi was playing year round, was he not?


The CBA regular season is less than 40 games. But yes Yi did play a lot more games than that with the CNT.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks