First Round Playoff Thread

Kerb Hohl · Post #101 » by **Kerb Hohl** » Sun Apr 29, 2012 7:59 pm

I was on the Sessions wagon as well.

Baddy Chuck · Post #102 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:00 pm

If Javale McGee had even average intelligence he could help a team so much.

A Diddy2231 · Post #103 » by **A Diddy2231** » Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:01 pm

Hammond has a boner for some Steve Blake..wants to play him at the 2 with Jennings

Sigra · Post #104 » by **Sigra** » Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:02 pm

Yeah, Ramon could look great here as well. Well yes we would need to have Kobe, Gasol and Bynum too but aside from that I am sure he could look great in Milwaukee if that evil Hammonds resigned him!!

europa · Post #105 » by **europa** » Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:04 pm

Sessions looked good in Cleveland too without LeBron there.

The only place he didn't look good was in Minnesota because he's a terrible fit for the triangle offense. Then again trying to implement the triangle offense with that team was a terrible idea and the primary reason why Rambis is sitting in Bristol right now.

Baddy Chuck · Post #106 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:05 pm

Sigra wrote:Yeah, Ramon could look great here as well. Well yes we would need to have Kobe, Gasol and Bynum too but aside from that I am sure he could look great in Milwaukee if that evil Hammonds resigned him!!

Ramon looked great here with Charlie Villanueva and Francisco Elson.

REDDzone · Post #107 » by **REDDzone** » Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:09 pm

Sigra wrote:Yeah, Ramon could look great here as well. Well yes we would need to have Kobe, Gasol and Bynum too but aside from that I am sure he could look great in Milwaukee if that evil Hammonds resigned him!!

So when he was doing well on losing teams he was a loser who'd never contribute to a winning team, but now that he is doing well on a winner its because of his teammates?

Is a player only eligible to receive credit if his team is good and he is the only good player on the team?

Sigra · Post #108 » by **Sigra** » Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:12 pm

europa wrote:Sessions looked good in Cleveland too without LeBron there.

The only place he didn't look good was in Minnesota because he's a terrible fit for the triangle offense. Then again trying to implement the triangle offense with that team was a terrible idea and the primary reason why Rambis is sitting in Bristol right now.

He had stats in bad Cleveland team. Bad teams always have some players who get some stats. He is now riding his 3 superstars and offcourse that it all looks great and nice. The thing is, he doesn't contribute much in anything. He is not a impact player whatsoever. He is just a guy.

Baddy Chuck · Post #109 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:14 pm

Look good on bad team = bad
Look good on good team = bad

Solid logic.

REDDzone · Post #110 » by **REDDzone** » Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:15 pm

Baddy Chuck wrote:Look good on bad team = bad
Look good on good team = bad

Lose on a losing team = loser (teammates disregarded)
Win on a winning team = loser (teammates taken into consideration)

Makes sense if you don't think about it.

europa · Post #111 » by **europa** » Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:15 pm

Baddy Chuck wrote:Look good on bad team = bad
Look good on good team = bad

Solid logic.

What I've deduced from this is ...

Look good = Sessions

Sigra · Post #112 » by **Sigra** » Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:17 pm

REDDzone wrote:
Sigra wrote:Yeah, Ramon could look great here as well. Well yes we would need to have Kobe, Gasol and Bynum too but aside from that I am sure he could look great in Milwaukee if that evil Hammonds resigned him!!

So when he was doing well on losing teams he was a loser who'd never contribute to a winning team, but now that he is doing well on a winner its because of his teammates?

Is a player only eligible to receive credit if his team is good and he is the only good player on the team?

I see things for what they are. No matter how good looking they are. Ramon is not an impact player. He is guy who will make some stats in bad team or "don't get on the way" in good teams. That's ok and you can win with him (i never said you can't) but he is not going to be a reason why you win. We are Milwaukee Bucks and we need our PG to be the reason why we win.

europa · Post #113 » by **europa** » Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:18 pm

Sessions has done a lot more than not get in the way for the Lakers. He's averaging 13 points/6 assists and shooting very impressively (48% overall and 49% from 3). He's definitely made a strong impact for LA since the trade.

Sigra · Post #114 » by **Sigra** » Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:20 pm

europa wrote:Sessions has done a lot more than not get in the way for the Lakers. He's averaging 13 points/6 assists and shooting very impressively (48% overall and 49% from 3). He's definitely made a strong impact for LA since the trade.

That's ok but I am not impresed. Still would take Jennings and Ridnour over him. But that's me.

europa · Post #115 » by **europa** » Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:23 pm

"You can't have a small team and win it all." Jeff Van Gundy.

jerrod · Post #116 » by **jerrod** » Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:24 pm

kobe gets worked on d and then has to immediately try to get it back

Baddy Chuck · Post #117 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:24 pm

Sigra wrote:
europa wrote:Sessions has done a lot more than not get in the way for the Lakers. He's averaging 13 points/6 assists and shooting very impressively (48% overall and 49% from 3). He's definitely made a strong impact for LA since the trade.

That's ok but I am not impresed. Still would take Jennings and Ridnour over him. But that's me.

Having Ramon off the bench would've been an awful thing to have, I agree.

MartyConlonOnTheRun · Post #118 » by **MartyConlonOnTheRun** » Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:24 pm

People do realize the Bulls would've been up by 20 over the Bucks so D-Rose wouldn't of been playing/got injured, right?

The Bucks couldn't even beat the Pacers, 76ers or whatever average team to make the playoffs. What makes people all of a sudden think they can beat a really good Bulls sans Rose team?

Baddy Chuck · Post #119 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:25 pm

europa wrote:"You can't have a small team and win it all." Jeff Van Gundy.

But you can make the playoffs!

Sometimes.[/Hammond]

SheedsWeed · Post #120 » by **SheedsWeed** » Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:27 pm

Steve Blake and Devin Ebanks have more points than Kobe, Pau, Bynum, and Sessions combined in the first half so far.

Whoa.