James1980 wrote:Jabari will want Embiids's 5/148 mil, no?
Of course but depending on how long he plays I think they settle on a 1 year
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
James1980 wrote:Jabari will want Embiids's 5/148 mil, no?
HoopsMalone wrote:Honestly I can not believe the general consensus on Jabari. If I was a Bucks fan I would be incredibly pissed if Jabari got like 4/$80M. It's not like he's really a difficult player to replace, and Giannis has a 5 year window before he may leave for another franchise. I'm not taking my chances. No freaking way. You have a pretty good team around Giannis. You could attract a good free agent. I don't really consider it a long shot.
Jabari really isn't that good even if he stays healthy. And the odds of that aren't good. He's going to have a lot of swelling and various other problems in all likelihood.
coolhandluke121 wrote:HoopsMalone wrote:Honestly I can not believe the general consensus on Jabari. If I was a Bucks fan I would be incredibly pissed if Jabari got like 4/$80M. It's not like he's really a difficult player to replace, and Giannis has a 5 year window before he may leave for another franchise. I'm not taking my chances. No freaking way. You have a pretty good team around Giannis. You could attract a good free agent. I don't really consider it a long shot.
Jabari really isn't that good even if he stays healthy. And the odds of that aren't good. He's going to have a lot of swelling and various other problems in all likelihood.
Most people here know that. Some just aren't ready to talk about it yet and are carrying on as if they don't, but they do.
jute2003 wrote:coolhandluke121 wrote:
Most people here know that. Some just aren't ready to talk about it yet and are carrying on as if they don't, but they do.
Tick
BMatt07 wrote:I'm a big Jabari fan, but if he asked for even 1 cent more than what Giannis is getting I would laugh him out of the building..
ReasonablySober wrote:Parker's an effortlessly efficient 20 ppg scorer with some playmaking ability who doesn't stop the ball. I don't think players that young and that good at what they do grow on trees.
The question with Parker that I've always come back to since his first injury is this: what's the alternative? Is it the 10 cents on the dollar package via trade? Is Giannis gonna go down early some season and the Bucks luck their way to a high pick? I don't see a better solution than paying Parker and hoping he improves defensively (and stays healthy).
ReasonablySober wrote:Parker's an effortlessly efficient 20 ppg scorer with some playmaking ability who doesn't stop the ball. I don't think players that young and that good at what they do grow on trees.
The question with Parker that I've always come back to since his first injury is this: what's the alternative? Is it the 10 cents on the dollar package via trade? Is Giannis gonna go down early some season and the Bucks luck their way to a high pick? I don't see a better solution than paying Parker and hoping he improves defensively (and stays healthy).
xTitan wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:Parker's an effortlessly efficient 20 ppg scorer with some playmaking ability who doesn't stop the ball. I don't think players that young and that good at what they do grow on trees.
The question with Parker that I've always come back to since his first injury is this: what's the alternative? Is it the 10 cents on the dollar package via trade? Is Giannis gonna go down early some season and the Bucks luck their way to a high pick? I don't see a better solution than paying Parker and hoping he improves defensively (and stays healthy).
Been saying this from day 1, Parker is also an emerging 3 point shooter, you need stars next to Giannis now, after year 2 of Giannis contract, he sees scrubs like DJ Wilson he is going to want out...nobody on here has been able to tell me a better way to add stars to this roster.
jute2003 wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:Parker's an effortlessly efficient 20 ppg scorer with some playmaking ability who doesn't stop the ball. I don't think players that young and that good at what they do grow on trees.
The question with Parker that I've always come back to since his first injury is this: what's the alternative? Is it the 10 cents on the dollar package via trade? Is Giannis gonna go down early some season and the Bucks luck their way to a high pick? I don't see a better solution than paying Parker and hoping he improves defensively (and stays healthy).
That's the thing.... He is or at least was already a talented offensive player and already a neutral impact player who was only going to improve. 20/21 year olds doing what he could offensively are rare and get paid accordingly.
He doesn't deserve a max at this point. If he gets it, it is a huge risk and a **** decision by management. To act like he won't ever be worth 10 mil a year is incredibly asinine at best though. CHL's schtick must be warping people's perspectives or something.
ReasonablySober wrote:jute2003 wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:Parker's an effortlessly efficient 20 ppg scorer with some playmaking ability who doesn't stop the ball. I don't think players that young and that good at what they do grow on trees.
The question with Parker that I've always come back to since his first injury is this: what's the alternative? Is it the 10 cents on the dollar package via trade? Is Giannis gonna go down early some season and the Bucks luck their way to a high pick? I don't see a better solution than paying Parker and hoping he improves defensively (and stays healthy).
That's the thing.... He is or at least was already a talented offensive player and already a neutral impact player who was only going to improve. 20/21 year olds doing what he could offensively are rare and get paid accordingly.
He doesn't deserve a max at this point. If he gets it, it is a huge risk and a **** decision by management. To act like he won't ever be worth 10 mil a year is incredibly asinine at best though. CHL's schtick must be warping people's perspectives or something.
I don't think you can honestly call him a neutral player. He wasn't so incredible on offense as to make up for being lost on defense. But I could see, with time and experience, that he could be a legit positive. If the range is there and he ups the volume while still taking advantage of the attention Giannis gets, he'd be 25-28 ppg guy on great efficiency. All he needs to became is not bad on defense, and he'd be a max contract guy.
Max Green wrote:BMatt07 wrote:I'm a big Jabari fan, but if he asked for even 1 cent more than what Giannis is getting I would laugh him out of the building..
The numbers Giannis signed for year ago (before his breakout season) is irrelevant to whatever Jabari signs for due the salary cap exploding.
paulpressey25 wrote:Jabari, great what Embiid got, but we'll continue the contract discussions on July 1, 2018.
ReginaldDwight wrote:paulpressey25 wrote:Jabari, great what Embiid got, but we'll continue the contract discussions on July 1, 2018.
Dont see how you offer a contract on a hurt player, really no other option but to take this to RFA.