JoeyMorgan619 wrote:So a better record 23 games in automatically means we're a better team
JoeyMorgan619 wrote:A few games ago I would've said no, but now I feel it's pretty clear we are.
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
JoeyMorgan619 wrote:So a better record 23 games in automatically means we're a better team
JoeyMorgan619 wrote:A few games ago I would've said no, but now I feel it's pretty clear we are.
chonestown wrote:JoeyMorgan619 wrote:So a better record 23 games in automatically means we're a better teamJoeyMorgan619 wrote:A few games ago I would've said no, but now I feel it's pretty clear we are.
JoeyMorgan619 wrote:chonestown wrote:JoeyMorgan619 wrote:So a better record 23 games in automatically means we're a better teamJoeyMorgan619 wrote:A few games ago I would've said no, but now I feel it's pretty clear we are.
Did you just learn how to quote someone?
Gifted Unlimited Rhymes Universal wrote:Lemonade is a popular drink and it still is
step3profit wrote:GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:jute2003 wrote:You do seem to be posting more this season.
the good posters are posting at alltime low levels that ive seen. a little here. a little there. the couple trolls are posting silly stuff and the only real debate is countering them.
good times. good times for bucks fans
Sorry man. I’ll pick up the pace a little.
It’s just that the Bucks no longer need us, the long suffering old school fans, to cradle their desiccated, frail corpse of a team and try to breathe life into the franchise and the city. The Bucks have been born again, the city loves them again, and our ministrations are no longer needed. This little golem we have protected, formed, and cradled over the years is ready to become a real little boy all on its own, and spread its wings, and fly out of the nest towards a gorgeous moonlit future.
JimmyTheKid wrote:The next series of intense debates will come after the season.
emunney wrote:Team has a net rating of +7.9 when Giannis is sitting. If you exclude Q4, because so much of the Giannis off time there is junk minutes, it actually goes up to +8.4. The Bucks are on a hot streak and that number is not likely to remain *that* high, but it bears repeating that it is EXTREMELY HIGH. Only two teams in the league have a net rating that high (other than the Bucks): Lakers and Mavs. That means our Giannis OFF lineups to date have outperformed every other team in our conference. This is with Khris missing more than 1/3 of the games, of course.
Some of you are slow to adapt to the fact that the team is now good enough that the *basketball* reasons for Giannis to stay are as real as it gets.
raferfenix wrote:JimmyTheKid wrote:The next series of intense debates will come after the season.
If Giannis leaves the intensity of debate over who / what is to blame might break realgm through a collective primal scream.
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:emunney wrote:Team has a net rating of +7.9 when Giannis is sitting. If you exclude Q4, because so much of the Giannis off time there is junk minutes, it actually goes up to +8.4. The Bucks are on a hot streak and that number is not likely to remain *that* high, but it bears repeating that it is EXTREMELY HIGH. Only two teams in the league have a net rating that high (other than the Bucks): Lakers and Mavs. That means our Giannis OFF lineups to date have outperformed every other team in our conference. This is with Khris missing more than 1/3 of the games, of course.
Some of you are slow to adapt to the fact that the team is now good enough that the *basketball* reasons for Giannis to stay are as real as it gets.
it would be interesting to see us in a 7 game series against a team like Toronto or philly without Giannis in uniform. I think wed have a chance. were sooooo deep.
we need to post your post on the general board. more fun posting there these days if youre a hothead like me and it would generate some interesting debate that were kicking everybodys ass whether Giannis is playing or not. there would be a bunch of bud this and system that rebuttals and maybe theyd even be true but regardless if you put our lineup out there without Giannis against those old atlanta teams he had were closer than you immediately would think right on down the line.
Bucksmaniac wrote:GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:emunney wrote:Team has a net rating of +7.9 when Giannis is sitting. If you exclude Q4, because so much of the Giannis off time there is junk minutes, it actually goes up to +8.4. The Bucks are on a hot streak and that number is not likely to remain *that* high, but it bears repeating that it is EXTREMELY HIGH. Only two teams in the league have a net rating that high (other than the Bucks): Lakers and Mavs. That means our Giannis OFF lineups to date have outperformed every other team in our conference. This is with Khris missing more than 1/3 of the games, of course.
Some of you are slow to adapt to the fact that the team is now good enough that the *basketball* reasons for Giannis to stay are as real as it gets.
it would be interesting to see us in a 7 game series against a team like Toronto or philly without Giannis in uniform. I think wed have a chance. were sooooo deep.
we need to post your post on the general board. more fun posting there these days if youre a hothead like me and it would generate some interesting debate that were kicking everybodys ass whether Giannis is playing or not. there would be a bunch of bud this and system that rebuttals and maybe theyd even be true but regardless if you put our lineup out there without Giannis against those old atlanta teams he had were closer than you immediately would think right on down the line.
I don’t think we’d have much of a chance without Giannis against Philly. Too much talent in their starting lineup if healthy (I know that’s a big if with their squad). Toronto though we’d definitely have a shot. They have the worst depth among the top East teams I believe, and Siakam tends to struggle against the Bucks.
DingleJerry wrote:I was just thinking today how close they are to undefeated. Buzzer beat vs Utah and blowing two huge leads vs Bos and Mia.
BTW I hate the general board talking point that Bud is a regular season coach due to the fact that he had that good ATL team once and made the ECF and lost to all time great LBJ, as if that's a flop. And that us going to ECF last year and starting the playoffs 12-1, but then losing is a flop. Granted, I did hate how we didn't adjust in those last 3 games. But I'm just saying trying to spin a story that winning two rounds of playoffs and then losing is evidence that you can't win in the playoffs just seems off. And it was an even worse argument going into last year's playoffs when all you had is 1 season losing to Lebron.
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |

emunney wrote:Bucksmaniac wrote:GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
it would be interesting to see us in a 7 game series against a team like Toronto or philly without Giannis in uniform. I think wed have a chance. were sooooo deep.
we need to post your post on the general board. more fun posting there these days if youre a hothead like me and it would generate some interesting debate that were kicking everybodys ass whether Giannis is playing or not. there would be a bunch of bud this and system that rebuttals and maybe theyd even be true but regardless if you put our lineup out there without Giannis against those old atlanta teams he had were closer than you immediately would think right on down the line.
I don’t think we’d have much of a chance without Giannis against Philly. Too much talent in their starting lineup if healthy (I know that’s a big if with their squad). Toronto though we’d definitely have a shot. They have the worst depth among the top East teams I believe, and Siakam tends to struggle against the Bucks.
I don't know how a playoff series would shake out, I'd guess we'd lose. My point is basically that the fact that there's even a numbers case to be made for the idea that we'd still be tops in the conference right now if we distributed Giannis' numbers proportionally across the rest of the team is insane and basically nobody's reckoning with it.
DingleJerry wrote:I was just thinking today how close they are to undefeated. Buzzer beat vs Utah and blowing two huge leads vs Bos and Mia.
BTW I hate the general board talking point that Bud is a regular season coach due to the fact that he had that good ATL team once and made the ECF and lost to all time great LBJ, as if that's a flop. And that us going to ECF last year and starting the playoffs 12-1, but then losing is a flop. Granted, I did hate how we didn't adjust in those last 3 games. But I'm just saying trying to spin a story that winning two rounds of playoffs and then losing is evidence that you can't win in the playoffs just seems off. And it was an even worse argument going into last year's playoffs when all you had is 1 season losing to Lebron.
Ruzious wrote:Wow, I was the 120th person to vote and only the 2nd no. I think it's very close. Last season was special until the end. Ask me on Christmas after we finish up a tough 4 games beginning with LAL and ending in Philly. If we win 3 of those, I'll change my mind.
SupremeHustle wrote:Salmons might shoot us out of games, but SJAX shoots people out of parking lots. Think about it.
SupremeHustle wrote:Salmons might shoot us out of games, but SJAX shoots people out of parking lots. Think about it.

Balls2TheWalls wrote:Ruzious wrote:Wow, I was the 120th person to vote and only the 2nd no. I think it's very close. Last season was special until the end. Ask me on Christmas after we finish up a tough 4 games beginning with LAL and ending in Philly. If we win 3 of those, I'll change my mind.
This is kind of the point of the poll right? Asking people to express how they feel about it through 23 games. Anyone can do it later when the answer is abundantly more clear.