ImageImage

PG Knicks - Unserious

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
Magic Giannison
RealGM
Posts: 27,848
And1: 27,302
Joined: Aug 08, 2014
   

Re: PG Knicks - Unserious 

Post#101 » by Magic Giannison » Sat Nov 9, 2024 5:41 am

But but but, lets kick Thanasis and get some other useless 15th bench man that provides nothing, that sure will help.

Whta a pathetic display from the team, no effort nothing. Fire Horst, this man is a criminal
User avatar
RiotPunch
RealGM
Posts: 27,872
And1: 18,244
Joined: Jul 05, 2009
Location: LA
     

Re: PG Knicks - Unserious 

Post#102 » by RiotPunch » Sat Nov 9, 2024 5:46 am

M-C-G wrote:
Wonka wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:Doc's whole postgame presser is just a complete disaster.


Hiring Doc has been a complete disaster. He may have been the worst possible option.


Rehiring Grief, but yeah, it’s looking real bad. Would be curious if this was a Horst decision or an owner decision

Neither Griff nor Doc were Horst's call, from my limited intel. I only have a buddy who is a beat writer with access to the team. Horst didn't want to fire Bud, but was pushed by Giannis and Edens. He wanted to hire Kenny as Bud and then Griff's replacement, but Giannis liked Griff (which was a an acceptable compromise for Edens, who wanted Nurse) and Doc has Haslam written all over it.

Take all of that with a grain of salt. Horst has still done a bad job and should be sizzling in the hot seat right now.
#FreeChuckDiesel
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
Chad34
RealGM
Posts: 12,617
And1: 5,781
Joined: Dec 04, 2016
Location: Knoxville, TN
     

Re: PG Knicks - Unserious 

Post#103 » by Chad34 » Sat Nov 9, 2024 5:59 am

RiotPunch wrote:
dbrodz7 wrote:
VooDoo7 wrote:Nope. No pick. So we can't even enjoy the loses once it really gets out of hand...


It seems nobody has any clue if our pick is protected next year, I've seen people saying nope it's not and others saying it's top 4 protected. I found an article from NO saying the 2025 first was top 4 protected, so which is it?

It is an incredibly easy Google search away.

'25 1st is to NOP, Top-4 protected. If it is outside the Top-4 it goes to BKN.

'26 1st NOP has swap rights, no protections.

Then the only solution is to tank for the number one pick, and trade away everyone not core to bring any assets back
User avatar
RiotPunch
RealGM
Posts: 27,872
And1: 18,244
Joined: Jul 05, 2009
Location: LA
     

Re: PG Knicks - Unserious 

Post#104 » by RiotPunch » Sat Nov 9, 2024 6:03 am

Chad34 wrote:
RiotPunch wrote:
dbrodz7 wrote:
It seems nobody has any clue if our pick is protected next year, I've seen people saying nope it's not and others saying it's top 4 protected. I found an article from NO saying the 2025 first was top 4 protected, so which is it?

It is an incredibly easy Google search away.

'25 1st is to NOP, Top-4 protected. If it is outside the Top-4 it goes to BKN.

'26 1st NOP has swap rights, no protections.

Then the only solution is to tank for the number one pick, and trade away everyone not core to bring any assets back

Dude, no. You are reading it wrong.

We don't get our '25 1st. Period.

New Orleans gets it if it is 1-4. Brooklyn gets it if it is 5-30.

We. Have. No. 2025. 1st. New Orleans protected it, not us.
#FreeChuckDiesel
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
neiLz
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,655
And1: 1,775
Joined: Oct 04, 2011
Location: Riverwest
     

Re: PG Knicks - Unserious 

Post#105 » by neiLz » Sat Nov 9, 2024 6:06 am

RiotPunch wrote:
Chad34 wrote:
RiotPunch wrote:It is an incredibly easy Google search away.

'25 1st is to NOP, Top-4 protected. If it is outside the Top-4 it goes to BKN.

'26 1st NOP has swap rights, no protections.

Then the only solution is to tank for the number one pick, and trade away everyone not core to bring any assets back

Dude, no. You are reading it wrong.

We don't get our '25 1st. Period.

New Orleans gets it if it is 1-4. Brooklyn gets it if it is 5-30.

We. Have. No. 2025. 1st. New Orleans protected it, not us.

We should tank for our 2nd round pick if they even have one.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,772
And1: 30,012
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: PG Knicks - Unserious 

Post#106 » by paulpressey25 » Sat Nov 9, 2024 6:14 am

This is how bad it’s gotten. Rando fans now saying even a single OKC player is too much to give up for Giannis.

Read on Twitter
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
Chad34
RealGM
Posts: 12,617
And1: 5,781
Joined: Dec 04, 2016
Location: Knoxville, TN
     

Re: PG Knicks - Unserious 

Post#107 » by Chad34 » Sat Nov 9, 2024 6:19 am

RiotPunch wrote:
Chad34 wrote:
RiotPunch wrote:It is an incredibly easy Google search away.

'25 1st is to NOP, Top-4 protected. If it is outside the Top-4 it goes to BKN.

'26 1st NOP has swap rights, no protections.

Then the only solution is to tank for the number one pick, and trade away everyone not core to bring any assets back

Dude, no. You are reading it wrong.

We don't get our '25 1st. Period.

New Orleans gets it if it is 1-4. Brooklyn gets it if it is 5-30.

We. Have. No. 2025. 1st. New Orleans protected it, not us.

My bad, we’re screwed :lol:
User avatar
GoldenAntlers
RealGM
Posts: 10,718
And1: 5,384
Joined: Feb 13, 2013
 

Re: PG Knicks - Unserious 

Post#108 » by GoldenAntlers » Sat Nov 9, 2024 6:20 am

MickeyDavis wrote:Switch to ESPN and watch Bud coach. Suns playing well
Was out to dinner with a buddy. We were gonna catch the Bucks game. They had the Suns game on both TVs. I didn't even ask them change one.
"Silence is a source of great strength." - Lao Tzu
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,454
And1: 42,636
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: PG Knicks - Unserious 

Post#109 » by ReasonablySober » Sat Nov 9, 2024 6:20 am

paulpressey25 wrote:This is how bad it’s gotten. Rando fans now saying even a single OKC player is too much to give up for Giannis.

Read on Twitter


Probably shouldn't repost rando tweets from accounts with under 10K if they're that stupid.
Packbuckman
Veteran
Posts: 2,726
And1: 1,361
Joined: Oct 02, 2019
     

Re: PG Knicks - Unserious 

Post#110 » by Packbuckman » Sat Nov 9, 2024 6:30 am

MickeyDavis wrote:
Packbuckman wrote:See how they play Sunday but Doc just baffles me he starts Ajax then benches him 2nd half for Green which I don’t mind him starting in 2nd half but keep Ajax in there and put prince on bench.
I wanted to see a
Dame green Ajax Tyler Giannis line up play these young kids especially after those blow bys from Kat on Brook

AJax had a hip pointer, that's why he didn't start the second half and played little in the 4th.

Oh ok I turned off the volume and put tunes on those two were driving me crazy were their commentary lol
User avatar
Dick Tate
Analyst
Posts: 3,412
And1: 2,977
Joined: Aug 17, 2006

Re: PG Knicks - Unserious 

Post#111 » by Dick Tate » Sat Nov 9, 2024 6:37 am

dbrodz7 wrote:
VooDoo7 wrote:
Chad34 wrote:Where does/can this team go? Are we ever in trade everyone territory? I’d hate to see us waste Gianni’s prime years on non playoff teams. Do we have a protected pick next year, if so maybe we should tank

Nope. No pick. So we can't even enjoy the loses once it really gets out of hand...


It seems nobody has any clue if our pick is protected next year, I've seen people saying nope it's not and others saying it's top 4 protected. I found an article from NO saying the 2025 first was top 4 protected, so which is it?

Both ;) :(
tydett
General Manager
Posts: 8,656
And1: 8,073
Joined: Feb 15, 2012
   

Re: PG Knicks - Unserious 

Post#112 » by tydett » Sat Nov 9, 2024 6:53 am

ReasonablySober wrote:
paulpressey25 wrote:This is how bad it’s gotten. Rando fans now saying even a single OKC player is too much to give up for Giannis.

Read on Twitter


Probably shouldn't repost rando tweets from accounts with under 10K if they're that stupid.


Sam Presti would drive either of those guys to Milwaukee himself if all it took to get Giannis in OKC was one of them and a truckload of picks.
User avatar
Plossum
General Manager
Posts: 9,199
And1: 6,159
Joined: Jan 18, 2014

Re: PG Knicks - Unserious 

Post#113 » by Plossum » Sat Nov 9, 2024 7:40 am

Rando tweeter isn’t entirely daft with his take. OKC has a good thing going right now and adding Giannis to the mix is no guarantee of success.

Adding Giannis changes that team a lot in how they play. And he’s not exactly a spring chicken anymore either so you’ve got to take into account how he’ll be in 3-5 years.

But yeah, it Giannis. You take him if the price is right but you wouldn’t sell the farm for him.
#LockUpChuck
User avatar
RiotPunch
RealGM
Posts: 27,872
And1: 18,244
Joined: Jul 05, 2009
Location: LA
     

Re: PG Knicks - Unserious 

Post#114 » by RiotPunch » Sat Nov 9, 2024 7:57 am

Image
#FreeChuckDiesel
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,365
And1: 25,563
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: PG Knicks - Unserious 

Post#115 » by Baddy Chuck » Sat Nov 9, 2024 7:59 am

Read on Twitter


Yeah this **** is devolving fast :lol:.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
User avatar
RiotPunch
RealGM
Posts: 27,872
And1: 18,244
Joined: Jul 05, 2009
Location: LA
     

Re: PG Knicks - Unserious 

Post#116 » by RiotPunch » Sat Nov 9, 2024 8:14 am

Image
#FreeChuckDiesel
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 39,862
And1: 11,593
Joined: May 12, 2002

Re: PG Knicks - Unserious 

Post#117 » by midranger » Sat Nov 9, 2024 8:58 am

0BobLobLaw0 wrote:
rilamann wrote:At least we all seen the Bucks win a championship. We all thought we would never see that in our lifetimes.


That championship has almost ruined (probably not the right word) sports for me. The Bucks winning a title was my biggest sports wish for all my life and I saw it - never thought it would happen. My sports cup has completely been filled by that. I don't take any losses by any teams I support nearly as hard as I did pre bucks championship.

100% this.

It was like, “Okay that happened. It was amazing. But my life is exactly the same now. Nothing transformative happened to me. Maybe I shouldn’t take all this so seriously anymore.”

Maybe the team felt that way too. Clearly, something (a few things) changed post championship. Effort level being one.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 39,862
And1: 11,593
Joined: May 12, 2002

Re: PG Knicks - Unserious 

Post#118 » by midranger » Sat Nov 9, 2024 9:09 am

As for the team, the problem is and always has been Giannis. His unwillingness and/or inability to make himself into a credible 5 rather than pretend to be a wing, combined with waning athleticism/health/effort has killed our ceiling. It kills me to say it, but he truly has become big Westbrook.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
User avatar
Prez
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 27,331
And1: 44,669
Joined: Jan 26, 2015
 

Re: PG Knicks - Unserious 

Post#119 » by Prez » Sat Nov 9, 2024 9:19 am

Nah, I'm not getting sucked into the Giannis stuff. The problems are Bobby being the worst player in the league, Pat being tsunami washed, and Brook aging as well.

You trade Bobby for literally any not **** player, get Khris back, and we have a chance.
Fotis St
General Manager
Posts: 9,447
And1: 3,143
Joined: May 05, 2015

Re: PG Knicks - Unserious 

Post#120 » by Fotis St » Sat Nov 9, 2024 9:38 am

Let's trade Kash ... I mean Glass

Return to Milwaukee Bucks