ImageImage

PG: Sun Burned

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

bucksfansince88
Analyst
Posts: 3,652
And1: 2,136
Joined: Sep 22, 2009
   

Re: PG: Sun Burned 

Post#101 » by bucksfansince88 » Tue Mar 25, 2025 6:17 pm

after this season they need a Pobo and new coach Doc is putrid
j_hilge444
Senior
Posts: 665
And1: 171
Joined: Feb 20, 2003
 

Re: PG: Sun Burned 

Post#102 » by j_hilge444 » Tue Mar 25, 2025 6:24 pm

What I want to know is what the hell all of those assistants are doing? The majority are very experienced. Are they collectively all dumbasses? Or is Doc too hardheaded to listen? You'd think he'd be opening the floor for suggestions at this point.
Luke Ridnour getting silly all over - throwing mad alley oops to Ilyasova.
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 25,262
And1: 28,847
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: PG: Sun Burned 

Post#103 » by Ron Swanson » Tue Mar 25, 2025 6:58 pm

j_hilge444 wrote:What I want to know is what the hell of of those assistants are doing? The majority are very experienced. Are they collectively all dumbasses? Or is Doc too hardheaded to listen? You'd think he'd be opening the floor for suggestions at this point.


We asked these same questions when Kidd was here. Prunty looked like a breath of fresh air in both his interim stints here and hilariously has a better overall win percentage than Doc does (23-17 vs. 57-50). At this point I'm just waiting for PP to put up the end-of-season poll about who was worse. Doc or Kidd?

8-)
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,400
And1: 29,159
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: PG: Sun Burned 

Post#104 » by paulpressey25 » Tue Mar 25, 2025 7:21 pm

tydett wrote:
Again, it's relative hindsight bias to say the Bucks should've kept Bud because of the trash they've installed in the head coaching spot since.


viewtopic.php?f=21&t=2287421&start=20#p105932069

I've been a Bud truther since day one. so you guys have to put up with it. There was no hindsight for me. Said in multiple other threads that the likelihood of us getting someone better was not great.

I get it, Giannis and the owners got impatient. It's the way sports works these days.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
ShootingtheJ
RealGM
Posts: 11,027
And1: 6,703
Joined: Jun 20, 2010

Re: PG: Sun Burned 

Post#105 » by ShootingtheJ » Tue Mar 25, 2025 7:49 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:
tydett wrote:
Again, it's relative hindsight bias to say the Bucks should've kept Bud because of the trash they've installed in the head coaching spot since.


viewtopic.php?f=21&t=2287421&start=20#p105932069

I've been a Bud truther since day one. so you guys have to put up with it. There was no hindsight for me. Said in multiple other threads that the likelihood of us getting someone better was not great.

I get it, Giannis and the owners got impatient. It's the way sports works these days.



Giannis and the owners saw how lazy Bud got. The team never practiced. They couldn't adjust on the fly because there was never an opportunity to practice adjustments. Young players couldn't develop. It had to end.
randy84
RealGM
Posts: 25,301
And1: 7,276
Joined: Jul 01, 2006

Re: PG: Sun Burned 

Post#106 » by randy84 » Tue Mar 25, 2025 7:59 pm

Ron Swanson wrote:
j_hilge444 wrote:What I want to know is what the hell of of those assistants are doing? The majority are very experienced. Are they collectively all dumbasses? Or is Doc too hardheaded to listen? You'd think he'd be opening the floor for suggestions at this point.


We asked these same questions when Kidd was here. Prunty looked like a breath of fresh air in both his interim stints here and hilariously has a better overall win percentage than Doc does (23-17 vs. 57-50). At this point I'm just waiting for PP to put up the end-of-season poll about who was worse. Doc or Kidd?

8-)

Don’t let PP put up another poll. That’s how we got Doc in the first place. I still remember the Doc or AG poll last season.
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 19,229
And1: 4,035
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: PG: Sun Burned 

Post#107 » by BUCKnation » Tue Mar 25, 2025 8:06 pm

I'm not super pressed about that loss, but we did a lot of dumb things along the way, in typical fashion, where it ends up being a frustrating loss on a very winnable game, ie missed free throws, very disjointed/poor plays down the stretch offensively (with 2 possessions left, you have to get a better shot off than double covered GTJ desperation), being a mess in transition, etc.

Other than some of those bad pass turnovers, I thought the suns played much cleaner and they still had to rely on KD shooting 80% from 3 and us playing like spazzes every third play to win.
nagawicka
Rookie
Posts: 1,219
And1: 355
Joined: Apr 06, 2014
   

Re: PG: Sun Burned 

Post#108 » by nagawicka » Tue Mar 25, 2025 8:44 pm

Wonka wrote:I notice the Kuzma Fan Club has gone silent as he quickly reveals the player he truly is and who most of us knew him to be. You can’t trade a smart, team first bucket getter for…whatever archetype you want to assign to Kuzma. It’s a team killing move, even without AJ included. Kuzma has no idea what he’s doing out there. He floats around on offense until he gets a wide open three, which he more often than not bricks. He effort on D and on the boards is gone. The kid was on his best behavior. Now he’s back to being a pouty player who actively makes your team worse.

No one was fooled into thinking Kuzma was a 1-for-1 Khris Khash Middleton plug-n-play replacement . . . except for overwrought fans clinging to the dead idea that Peak $Khash$ Money Middleton still existed. The League wasn't gonna pay Peak $Khash$ value b/c the he no longer has superstar value to NBA GMs, and Horst didn't ask for a Khris Archetype b/c we needed to acquire Kuzma's role and just reproducting Khris's role would conflict with Giannis's so-called 'needs'. Your expectations aren't grounded in reality.
msiris
RealGM
Posts: 10,956
And1: 2,245
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
Location: Central Wisconsin

Re: PG: Sun Burned 

Post#109 » by msiris » Tue Mar 25, 2025 8:56 pm

nagawicka wrote:
Wonka wrote:I notice the Kuzma Fan Club has gone silent as he quickly reveals the player he truly is and who most of us knew him to be. You can’t trade a smart, team first bucket getter for…whatever archetype you want to assign to Kuzma. It’s a team killing move, even without AJ included. Kuzma has no idea what he’s doing out there. He floats around on offense until he gets a wide open three, which he more often than not bricks. He effort on D and on the boards is gone. The kid was on his best behavior. Now he’s back to being a pouty player who actively makes your team worse.

No one was fooled into thinking Kuzma was a 1-for-1 Khris Khash Middleton plug-n-play replacement . . . except for overwrought fans clinging to the dead idea that Peak $Khash$ Money Middleton still existed. The League wasn't gonna pay Peak $Khash$ value b/c the he no longer has superstar value to NBA GMs, and Horst didn't ask for a Khris Archetype b/c we needed to acquire Kuzma's role and just reproducting Khris's role would conflict with Giannis's so-called 'needs'. Your expectations aren't grounded in reality.
The thing is Mids was never a superstar but we had to pay him like onebecause we couldn't get one to come here and had to do what we did to keep him.
Ride the tank
soxperry
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,517
And1: 4,192
Joined: Jul 08, 2018
     

Re: PG: Sun Burned 

Post#110 » by soxperry » Tue Mar 25, 2025 9:05 pm

fansinceforever wrote:My opinion about this team would not have changed at all had Brook made that shot. I don't think this board is being reactionary to individual performances.


lol....

okay
KidA24
RealGM
Posts: 10,652
And1: 10,386
Joined: Nov 01, 2012

Re: PG: Sun Burned 

Post#111 » by KidA24 » Tue Mar 25, 2025 9:06 pm

bucksfansince88 wrote:after this season they need a Pobo and new coach Doc is putrid


They gonna make Doc POBO
Amos Barshad: "So you got a job, a place to live, a license? What’s left?"

Giannis: “Nothing. Just get a ring now.”
nagawicka
Rookie
Posts: 1,219
And1: 355
Joined: Apr 06, 2014
   

Re: PG: Sun Burned 

Post#112 » by nagawicka » Tue Mar 25, 2025 9:33 pm

PG Graveyard wrote:It doesn’t matter what this organization does…we aren’t winning anything if Giannis continues to be a trainwreck at the line. It is just so deflating to have to go through his process only to miss both free throws

In a 108-106 Bucks Loss, Giannis posted 6 FTM out of 13 FTA for a 46.2 FT%. We all see the spectacular play [can I get a Christopher Walken 'Wah-OW!']. The reality is 7 missed free throws in a 2-point margin of defeat is no triumph of superstar basketball ability. Doing the same thing over and over again and getting the same resulting free throws is the definition of what now? True, Brook & Kuzma each missed one (1) free throw, and must be blamed for not getting us a TIE, because they are no-good "mediocre" PER realGM(!) hapless stumblebums next to the greatest player of all time. There are better ways of going about this and the Bucks tend to win with 5 or 6 guys in double figures instead of two at >35 or 45 ppg. Ball dont' lie.
fansinceforever
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,191
And1: 2,617
Joined: Oct 26, 2010
   

Re: PG: Sun Burned 

Post#113 » by fansinceforever » Tue Mar 25, 2025 9:35 pm

soxperry wrote:
fansinceforever wrote:My opinion about this team would not have changed at all had Brook made that shot. I don't think this board is being reactionary to individual performances.


lol....

okay


Check my post history. I've been saying the sun has set on this team for over a year now. Many have joined in with varying degrees of how bleak they think it is.

It's fair to say the tone here wouldn't be positive or upbeat just because Brook makes that shot last night. Most here see there's major issues.
ShootingtheJ
RealGM
Posts: 11,027
And1: 6,703
Joined: Jun 20, 2010

Re: PG: Sun Burned 

Post#114 » by ShootingtheJ » Tue Mar 25, 2025 10:01 pm

BUCKnation wrote:I'm not super pressed about that loss, but we did a lot of dumb things along the way, in typical fashion, where it ends up being a frustrating loss on a very winnable game, ie missed free throws, very disjointed/poor plays down the stretch offensively (with 2 possessions left, you have to get a better shot off than double covered GTJ desperation), being a mess in transition, etc.

Other than some of those bad pass turnovers, I thought the suns played much cleaner and they still had to rely on KD shooting 80% from 3 and us playing like spazzes every third play to win.


True, we probably win this game if it wasn't a Tyler Ford reffed game. I remember the Bucks getting blasted in Phoenix again and again. This one came down to the wire, just too much Kuzma at the end.
mediocrityrules
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,770
And1: 5,600
Joined: Nov 27, 2013
 

Re: PG: Sun Burned 

Post#115 » by mediocrityrules » Tue Mar 25, 2025 10:08 pm

Maybe we need a new billboard...
Circling calendars since 2021
soxperry
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,517
And1: 4,192
Joined: Jul 08, 2018
     

Re: PG: Sun Burned 

Post#116 » by soxperry » Tue Mar 25, 2025 10:11 pm

fansinceforever wrote:
soxperry wrote:
fansinceforever wrote:My opinion about this team would not have changed at all had Brook made that shot. I don't think this board is being reactionary to individual performances.


lol....

okay


Check my post history. I've been saying the sun has set on this team for over a year now. Many have joined in with varying degrees of how bleak they think it is.

It's fair to say the tone here wouldn't be positive or upbeat just because Brook makes that shot last night. Most here see there's major issues.


yeah so i was here when we were trading Giannis during the finals run.. so my comment was directed at the bolded part. that's a hilarious statement.

edit: i dont know why bold isn't working but it's the last sentence in your first post
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 101,055
And1: 53,955
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: PG: Sun Burned 

Post#117 » by MickeyDavis » Tue Mar 25, 2025 10:15 pm

mediocrityrules wrote:Maybe we need a new billboard...

It's kind of funny that the billboard was about stopping always shooting for the 8th seed and get more lottery picks. And then when we won the title we did it with just one lottery pick on the roster and he was signed as a FA, not drafted (Lopez)
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
Wonka
General Manager
Posts: 9,166
And1: 5,972
Joined: Aug 19, 2012
 

Re: PG: Sun Burned 

Post#118 » by Wonka » Tue Mar 25, 2025 10:26 pm

nagawicka wrote:
Wonka wrote:I notice the Kuzma Fan Club has gone silent as he quickly reveals the player he truly is and who most of us knew him to be. You can’t trade a smart, team first bucket getter for…whatever archetype you want to assign to Kuzma. It’s a team killing move, even without AJ included. Kuzma has no idea what he’s doing out there. He floats around on offense until he gets a wide open three, which he more often than not bricks. He effort on D and on the boards is gone. The kid was on his best behavior. Now he’s back to being a pouty player who actively makes your team worse.

No one was fooled into thinking Kuzma was a 1-for-1 Khris Khash Middleton plug-n-play replacement . . . except for overwrought fans clinging to the dead idea that Peak $Khash$ Money Middleton still existed. The League wasn't gonna pay Peak $Khash$ value b/c the he no longer has superstar value to NBA GMs, and Horst didn't ask for a Khris Archetype b/c we needed to acquire Kuzma's role and just reproducting Khris's role would conflict with Giannis's so-called 'needs'. Your expectations aren't grounded in reality.


Never stated that I expected him to replace Khris one for one. You're projecting.

My stated expectations are that he stops taking awful threes and get back to playing intense defense while hitting the boards. You know, like he was for the first few weeks of his time here. Not unrealistic at all. Highly grounded in reality.

I think is funny that you're speaking for Giannis’ hypothetical needs like you're privy to some inside knowledge. What we know is that Giannis requires spacing, which Kuzma doesn't bring and Khris did. What else? We are better with him off the floor since he got here. Net rating speaks for itself.

On: 110.7 OffRtg (25th), 110.0 DefRtg (3rd), +0.6 NetRtg (15th)

Off: 115.6 OffRtg (14th), 106.9 DefRtg (1st), +8.7 NetRtg (6th)

Its appropriate to continue to point out the objective reality of the situation instead of making up arguments that are TRULY not rooted in reality :lol:
User avatar
Iheartfootball
Head Coach
Posts: 6,528
And1: 5,406
Joined: May 09, 2014
     

Re: PG: Sun Burned 

Post#119 » by Iheartfootball » Tue Mar 25, 2025 10:38 pm

The entire organization isn't bright from a basketball perspective. Low b-ball IQ starts at the top. They are better at property development than hoops operations.

And just because they won a title doesn't mean they were had a high BBIQ; it can also mean they won despite their lack of intelligence.
Everybody wants to go to heaven but nobody wants to die.
stillgotgame
Analyst
Posts: 3,451
And1: 2,235
Joined: May 27, 2005
     

Re: PG: Sun Burned 

Post#120 » by stillgotgame » Tue Mar 25, 2025 10:52 pm

Wonka wrote:
blazza18 wrote:
PG Graveyard wrote:We played Brook Lopez almost 42 minutes in a game we could have easily tried to go small. It’s not like we are rebounding well playing our big lineups anyways.


Yeah way too many minutes. Tough to find the right balance because he was easily our most consistent and most reliable scorer and player after Giannis.


Brook is playing the most he’s played since coming to Milwaukee. We are begging for an injury with the way we are running him.


But Doc isn’t a real doctor so he can play him as many minutes as he wants.
Is this moron really our coach? I loved him as a player at Marquette but he’s completely clueless.
Bucks in 6

Return to Milwaukee Bucks