Rockmaninoff wrote:Because he can finish around the basket better than those (2) players can, the chemisty would be good with the Deng/Gordan connection, and you have enough defense to cover for him. Your team needs scoring, period. Low post or not. You guys also have Ben Wallace, who the coach can't just bench with that contract. Ben Wallace is Noah's problem, and it would be easier to move Noah, as opposed to Wallace. Plenty of good PF/C coming up in the 2008 draft for you guys to replace Noah with, and eventually Wallace. Wallace was very successful with a power forward with the same skill set as CV, Rasheed Wallace. There are some reasons.
So let me get this straight. Let's correct the $60million problem by trading away our young defensive stud(s), that as rookies, are currently outplaying him in every statistical category, by a mile. Is that what you're saying? How about pulling a Steve Francis on his ass and sending him home?
BTW, in case you haven't noticed, BW doesn't play defense. No he really doesn't, no matter who's next to him. And this may be shocking, but he doesn't play any offense either. So no, the little benefit we'd get from CV would be greatly outweighed by the loss of a TT/Noah in the future.
This may suprise you but even though the shooting % of our entire core is down across the board, it's our defense that's taken the biggest hit from last year. Last year we were 21st in offensive rating, this year we're 25th, not that far off. However last year we were 1st in defensive rating, this year we're ranked 13th.
Our problems run deeper than what CV would bring to the table. Besides we have a finisher in Deng. What good is he when we don't ulitize him properly? The problem is our offensive schemes aren't set to utilize our players strengths. We don't really have a true PG that can penetrate and dish, and that coupled with no low post scoring presence greatly exacerbates the problem.
CV is far from what we need.
Edit: Sorry, I don't want to hijack your thread and turn this into a Bulls discussion.