ImageImage

Bucks ownership: Lowe/Windhorst ESPN piece pg 5

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis

User avatar
MadBlueEdwards
Analyst
Posts: 3,024
And1: 1,317
Joined: Sep 24, 2010

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#121 » by MadBlueEdwards » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:25 pm

ackypoo wrote:
MadBlueEdwards wrote:Really hoping that this national attention is the wake-up call they need in order to get their sh*t together.

its going to get worse before it gets better.


Maybe, but it's been getting worse pretty rapidly lately. I'm going to hope this is the tipping point.
User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,954
And1: 16,632
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: Bucks ownership: Lowe/Windhorst ESPN piece pg 5 

Post#122 » by humanrefutation » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:27 pm

Did Zanik **** Mallory or something? Edens must have really hated that man to go through all of this crap - potentially fracturing his relationship with his partners - to ensure he didn't get the job.
ACGB
RealGM
Posts: 10,714
And1: 2,813
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Location: 414
 

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#123 » by ACGB » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:27 pm

It was a pipe dream to hope that these hedge fund alpha dog types were going to put their egos aside and let someone else run the show for them.
imithanos
Starter
Posts: 2,136
And1: 657
Joined: Nov 06, 2014
   

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#124 » by imithanos » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:28 pm

Maybe Lasry let Edens pick another GM but Zanik, cause Edens didn't have Kidd fired on February and in a way he owned him.
:reporter:

PS: Preparing myself for GOT.
No hay banda.
User avatar
Zeezprah
Analyst
Posts: 3,539
And1: 1,569
Joined: Apr 16, 2014
Location: How can the Bucks be real if our eyes aren't real?
     

Re: Bucks ownership: Lowe/Windhorst ESPN piece pg 5 

Post#125 » by Zeezprah » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:28 pm

I actually feel ok about Horst, we just need a new HC who doesn't meddle
User avatar
Zeezprah
Analyst
Posts: 3,539
And1: 1,569
Joined: Apr 16, 2014
Location: How can the Bucks be real if our eyes aren't real?
     

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#126 » by Zeezprah » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:33 pm

sidney lanier wrote:It's been almost a century since F. Scott Fitzgerald wrote that the very rich are different from you and me, but the message doesn't seem to have reached many on this forum yet. LED are not Average Joes, and applying Average Joe standards to them, or criticizing them for not living up to those standards, or complaining they do things differently from the way you would do them if you were an NBA owner, is a mistake.

Compared to other owners, LED aren't particularly meddling, incompetent, or high-handed. True, they probably see the Bucks as an asset, but that doesn't preclude them from feeling about this team the way, say, the Queen of England feels about the race horses she owns. There's emotional investment there, however tainted (at least in the eyes of the non-capitalists among us) by venal considerations.

And if we're turning professional sports into an ethics symposium, where is the outrage over a Michael Milken protege owning our baseball team? (Or for that matter MLB now embracing that crook?)


This is a great point, just because the owners want to make money, doesn't mean they don't want the team to win. There's other ways to make money besides owning sports franchises (that usually require less headaches).
DingleJerry
RealGM
Posts: 15,213
And1: 10,836
Joined: Jul 09, 2015
       

Re: Bucks ownership: Lowe/Windhorst ESPN piece pg 5 

Post#127 » by DingleJerry » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:33 pm

They've done well with all the marketing and re-branding.

But basketball has been a mess. Long story short, without Giannis this team/organization would still be a laughing stock of the league. They fell ass backwards into a superstar, that's all they have going for them.

Reminds me of that Hoosiers line: My nerves are shot. But with Jimmy, all the pistons are firing.

Basically, everything is a mess. But with Giannis anything could happen in spite of it.
Resident Lillard truther since 2015.
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#128 » by xTitan » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:34 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:As Governor Edens has the Bucks vote on all league matters. And yes he would have the final say on ownership issues and could override what the other 2 wanted. But as outlined in the article when there is a disagreement they try to work it out. Horst was a consensus candidate. Hell they picked him without even talking to him. While Lasry brought in Kidd he also brought in Zanik, who most of us preferred over Horst.

For better or worse I wish one of these guys would buy out the other 2. Not going to happen though.

Oh I think you can read between the lines and see that Eden's at least threatened to use his governorship powers. Lasry and Dinan were clearly behind Zanik, plus neither decided to show for the press conference. Slice it anyway you like, this is a proven failed set up and these 3 seem less competent than most.
4xBuck
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,917
And1: 569
Joined: Sep 07, 2009

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#129 » by 4xBuck » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:35 pm

JayMKE wrote:I think they are billionaire Wall Street hedge fund managers who will make a lot of money when they finally cash in on this investment. People on this board are so bipolar and quick to change their tunes when the games start, a few impressive summer league performances from our young guys and one trade/FA signing people will get back on board. Our team is really young and it seems like people raise their expectations really fast, as far as player development goes we are way ahead of schedule.


Yep...

As owners, they've done a great job building the infrastructure of the Bucks. When they bought the team, all they had was a bad stadium. Now, they a have G-league team, a brand new practice facility and in a year a brand new state of the art stadium with a beer garden/entertainment block.

:lift:
User avatar
ackypoo
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,543
And1: 3,358
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
 

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#130 » by ackypoo » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:38 pm

4xBuck wrote:
JayMKE wrote:I think they are billionaire Wall Street hedge fund managers who will make a lot of money when they finally cash in on this investment. People on this board are so bipolar and quick to change their tunes when the games start, a few impressive summer league performances from our young guys and one trade/FA signing people will get back on board. Our team is really young and it seems like people raise their expectations really fast, as far as player development goes we are way ahead of schedule.


Yep...

As owners, they've done a great job building the infrastructure of the Bucks. When they bought the team, all they had was a bad stadium. Now, they a have G-league team, a brand new practice facility and in a year a brand new state of the art stadium with a beer garden/entertainment block.

:lift:

and none of that **** truly matters to us.

i signed up to watch basketball, not state of the art beer gardens.

and in 4 years when they dont turn it around because they continue to mismanage the basketball side, and giannis leaves, so will i.
Max Green
RealGM
Posts: 16,324
And1: 4,715
Joined: Jul 04, 2007
Location: Heelville
 

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#131 » by Max Green » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:40 pm

Matches Malone wrote:
skones wrote:I guess I was under the impression that Lasry was the one with governor power. It seemed like he was spearheading a lot of what was going on.


That's what I thought too. Everyone kept saying this is all Lasry's doing and Edens was the smart one that will get us back on the right path when he takes his turn. Guess Edens sucks? ...


It shows a lot of people didn't know what they were talking about. Stun.
Vice President of Parker-Nation.
#Jabariunleashed
#OwnTheFuture
:wizard: Maxtradamus
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 34,492
And1: 11,519
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: Bucks ownership: Lowe/Windhorst ESPN piece pg 5 

Post#132 » by Turk Nowitzki » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:43 pm

Zeezprah wrote:I actually feel ok about Horst, we just need a new HC who doesn't meddle

Unfortunately, I feel like Horst barely matters. I can't imagine his opinion overriding LED's or Kidd's on anything important.
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,525
And1: 9,849
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#133 » by M-C-G » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:43 pm

imithanos wrote:Maybe Lasry let Edens pick another GM but Zanik, cause Edens didn't have Kidd fired on February and in a way he owned him.
:reporter:

PS: Preparing myself for GOT.



I think that is one part and I think the other part was an agreement, maybe PP suggested, Alex Lasry moves into Horst old role and gets "groomed" as a future assistant GM. While that would not be good for the team, that seems like a logical negotiation that could have occurred.
lvckv
Starter
Posts: 2,396
And1: 2,031
Joined: Jan 24, 2017
Location: Europe
     

Re: Bucks ownership: Lowe/Windhorst ESPN piece pg 5 

Post#134 » by lvckv » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:44 pm

The best thing about this team was already here before they took over. I have a feeling we're looking at Kevin Garnett on the Timberwolves mk2 rather than possible Championship contention with our future top 3/5 player.

New arena, rebranding yadda yadda. Making $$ but it's not helping the on-court product. Instead we've got a bottom 5 coach, we overpay mediocre role players, we fight for the 6-8 seed instead of fighting for a higher draft pick to get another star, etc etc..
User avatar
JimmyTheKid
General Manager
Posts: 9,045
And1: 5,436
Joined: Feb 10, 2009

Re: Bucks ownership: Lowe/Windhorst ESPN piece pg 5 

Post#135 » by JimmyTheKid » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:44 pm

DingleJerry wrote:They've done well with all the marketing and re-branding.

But basketball has been a mess. Long story short, without Giannis this team/organization would still be a laughing stock of the league. They fell ass backwards into a superstar, that's all they have going for them.

Reminds me of that Hoosiers line: My nerves are shot. But with Jimmy, all the pistons are firing.

Basically, everything is a mess. But with Giannis anything could happen in spite of it.


Not really though. We have a stable of young talent and no terrible contracts.
User avatar
JimmyTheKid
General Manager
Posts: 9,045
And1: 5,436
Joined: Feb 10, 2009

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#136 » by JimmyTheKid » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:47 pm

ackypoo wrote:
4xBuck wrote:
JayMKE wrote:I think they are billionaire Wall Street hedge fund managers who will make a lot of money when they finally cash in on this investment. People on this board are so bipolar and quick to change their tunes when the games start, a few impressive summer league performances from our young guys and one trade/FA signing people will get back on board. Our team is really young and it seems like people raise their expectations really fast, as far as player development goes we are way ahead of schedule.


Yep...

As owners, they've done a great job building the infrastructure of the Bucks. When they bought the team, all they had was a bad stadium. Now, they a have G-league team, a brand new practice facility and in a year a brand new state of the art stadium with a beer garden/entertainment block.

:lift:

and none of that **** truly matters to us.

i signed up to watch basketball, not state of the art beer gardens.

and in 4 years when they dont turn it around because they continue to mismanage the basketball side, and giannis leaves, so will i.


They bought the team coming off the worst record in franchise history, 15-67. We've had two playoff appearances and significant growth from our youngsters without mortgaging the future via trade or bad FA contract.
4xBuck
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,917
And1: 569
Joined: Sep 07, 2009

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#137 » by 4xBuck » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:48 pm

ackypoo wrote:and none of that **** truly matters to us


Yeah... That's very telling.

If you want a comp, just go north east a bit and look at what the Packers have done to their infrastructure. Or even south east and look what the Cubs are doing.

This is all part of the process. If you want to ignore this part of the process because it doesn't fir your agenda to complain about the owners, that's on you.
User avatar
SirChurros
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,576
And1: 4,256
Joined: Apr 02, 2015
   

Re: Bucks ownership: Lowe/Windhorst ESPN piece pg 5 

Post#138 » by SirChurros » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:52 pm

humanrefutation wrote:Did Zanik **** Mallory or something? Edens must have really hated that man to go through all of this crap - potentially fracturing his relationship with his partners - to ensure he didn't get the job.


Really don't think this:

Image

is **** this:

Image
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 25,726
And1: 29,558
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Bucks ownership: Lowe/Windhorst ESPN piece pg 5 

Post#139 » by Ron Swanson » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:57 pm

Amazing that with the best young superstar in the league, a brand new arena, and a young talented roster that's the envy of most teams in the conference, that we still have indecisive and inept ownership who can't get out of their own way. #Sad.
imithanos
Starter
Posts: 2,136
And1: 657
Joined: Nov 06, 2014
   

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#140 » by imithanos » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:57 pm

JimmyTheKid wrote:
ackypoo wrote:
4xBuck wrote:
Yep...

As owners, they've done a great job building the infrastructure of the Bucks. When they bought the team, all they had was a bad stadium. Now, they a have G-league team, a brand new practice facility and in a year a brand new state of the art stadium with a beer garden/entertainment block.

:lift:

and none of that **** truly matters to us.

i signed up to watch basketball, not state of the art beer gardens.

and in 4 years when they dont turn it around because they continue to mismanage the basketball side, and giannis leaves, so will i.


They bought the team coming off the worst record in franchise history, 15-67. We've had two playoff appearances and significant growth from our youngsters without mortgaging the future via trade or bad FA contract.


The biggest mistake this ownership has done thus far is not slowly rebuilding the team on their first year. With Jabari and Giannis, they should have taken it slowly. Not tanking, but not going for the PO with Zaza, Ersan and co that left the next summer. And I'm not talking about a top-5 pick in the next draft. Can you imagine if we had a D. Booker or M. Turner in our team instead of Vaughn? We should have followed the Nuggets way, if not the wolves or sixers. No old FA signings and a win now moves.
No hay banda.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks