soxperry wrote:German Athens wrote:Even if we had the worst record in the league in consecutive years, which I don’t think is the likeliest outcome, the odds of ever giving up a #1 is 26%.
Those aren’t good odds.
Its not only about number 1. Its about having multiple cracks at top level picks.
Yeah, and I understand that’s how a number of current contenders got there.
But if we were to step back for a second, the expected value of each pick isn’t actually all that good, either. If we know something about an upcoming draft, that’s informative, but beyond 2026, I’m not sure we can say that.
Time runs together for me, but I made a post recently looking into the expected value (median) over the last 15 drafts. For #1, it was KAT a perennial all-star, but not a guy who’s a perennial all-nba player. For #2, it was D’Lo, a single all star. For #3, I think it was RJ Barrett.
More generously how I’ve always mapped it in my head is that a #1 is someone like KAT, a #2 is a 3-time all-star like Khris or Beal, and a #3 is a really good starter or a guy who sneaks on one all-star team like Conley or Derrick White.
By pick 4, you aren’t even expecting an all-star worthy player.
In our situation, if we come to NOP or POR asking for our picks back, it’ll either be because we want to Tank or don’t believe in our ability to do anything else. Both those situations give the other teams a ton of leverage, and we’d probably have to give 2 prized 1sts for a single 1st back, or a good 1st for a swap which is disgusting to me. I just don’t like that asset play when you consider the lottery odds, how neither of those teams are likely playoff squads anytime soon, and even the expected value of a better pick.