midranger wrote:So, assuming your fund has been around 30ish years, you’re claiming that after fees your investors have seen around a 17% annual return every. Single. Year.
Yeah. I’m calling bull ****. But feel free to post the fund name. We can easily see if that’s accurate. If it is, I’ll even invest in it.
35 Years and it's about 14% compounded annually. As I stated before, it's been across multiple firms, and I'm not really interested in sharing personal information, nor do I care about proving myself to anyone on here. I just don't want people who are part of a community I'm in to not have full information about things that impact their livelihood.
To SidneyLanier, 100% stocks are moving together in a much stronger correlation. As midranger pointed out, this is hugely impacted by passive investing. I would just be worried about what happens when the cycle turns and people start withdrawing/selling. It amplifies the way up and the way down. All this Liquidity could evaporate.
3 things matter for SP500 and other indexes funds going forward.
1. Revenue growth - can it continue to infinity faster than GDP?
2. Margin expansion - Can we expect this to continue in perpetuity?
3. Multiple expansion/contraction - Look at Shiller cyclically adjusted PE in link below. Higher than any time except for the 2000 dot com bubble (PEts.com, Yahoo, etc) That should be alarming to everyone.
https://www.multpl.com/shiller-pe





























