Bernman wrote:On_Wisconsin wrote:That's not my ideal starting 5 either but only an idea.
I'd look to deal Henson while he still has value as well. I'd do everything I can to flip Henson for Nurkic. While I think looking at both Asik and Dieng are good ideas in theory, I would only move Ersan for Dieng. I don't think Payne can play too much 5, but if he can I'd love to be wrong. And I think Smart can play PG too
Smart/Wolters
Middleton/Bogdanovic or Adams
Giannis/Defino
Parker/Ersan(?)
Nurkic/Zaza/Miroslav
*Assuming a Sanders/Knight trade for 7 and we take Parker and Smart and Henson is dealt for Nurkic
You don't like Asik, or maybe his situation being a vet and on a 1-year deal. I get that.
But I don't like Nurkic either. I think it would be a good strategy to try and flip Henson for him otherwise because he is a true center and is considered value around that spot. However, I just see a lot of Gadzuric and Biyombo there. He gets baited hard on an opponent's first move, offensively and defensively, and thus is heavily prone to fouls and fools. To wit I think his production overseas is probably fool's gold. He can't, legally, play much more than he does in a game. And the block plus steal rate he has when he is actually on the court, you have to balance with his ridiculously high foul and turnover rate, and the fact that so often he's probably not there to challenge an opposing player at the rim because he's gambling whereas a disciplined defender like Bogut was for example would just stay there and get the non-statistical but more effective alter. I also see some Araujo with Nurkic in that, to an extent, he has to be highly aggressive because he's not very long for a center. Otherwise it's a product of coming to the game late, and outside of anomalies like I think Embiid is, most guys with that background don't figure it out.
I'd much prefer Payne because he does have the instincts for the most part of a player who has been around the game for a while, as well as an extra-ordinary skill-set for a long-armed guy. Most guys who have around a 7'4" wingspan, are 6'10"+, and 240, can't shoot, handle, and have the first step to blow by people off the dribble. But Payne does. His game reminds me of older KG with the Celts, or Cliff Robinson's. That 7'4" wingspan gives him a lot of center potential on the defensive end at least. He's got the same wingspan basically as Vonleh, with 1 more inch of height and standing reach, and many are saying Vonleh is a pf/c. So it should be easily a viable plan for Payne.
Going back to Asik as a more true center option, and someone who'd project to help out more in the interim, I like him enough for 2 reasons: 1. he's the type of defensive and rebounding center the Bucks could need with Parker at pf, and 2. we need to pay some players to make the minimum and he's someone the Bucks could extend for a few years and then have come off cap before we need to address the projected young core's monetary desires. I am inclined to think he would take an extension/re-sign because of what he experienced in Houston being blocked and he wouldn't have that problem here for a while most likely. I would prefer Dieng too because we wouldn't have to worry about extending him and he has some upside still, but maybe that's why the T-Wolves wouldn't deal him that easily by the same token. It helps to have multiple options, and to keep them open.
All that said, looking at your revised lineup projection, we aren't far off anyway. Just a lone, glaring mistake from my POV, but seldom do you get everything you want.