randy84 wrote:MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:randy84 wrote:
But what did he do with this Bucks team?
Ok so he had an above average 17 game stretch. He also looked bad defensively. I'm ok trusting the bucks on what they saw in the locker room and on film + his last two years in the league over some games in December and January. I'm not losing sleep on losing Cousins and if he is the reason we lose a series in May we have bigger issues.
My biggest problem was not having another body and now we have that.
I agree. The big issue is having a big body. They could have just kept Boogie and the problem was solved. If you want "roster flexibility" get rid of Semi.
The mental gymnastics that the Boogie detractors go through to justify his release is what is getting annoying. I could care less about a watch, why he wasn't offered a invite, how long it took someone to sign him, how Luke Kornet is a much better player, or any other absurd reasons that he was let go. The Bucks obviously didn't have a problem with his attitude until it was time to guarantee his contract. Some times the simple answer is the right one.
Semi IS the roster flexibility. The Bucks need outgoing salaries (even minimum ones) in a trade, Cousins wouldn’t have been able to be traded based on his signing date.
Yes, the Bucks should’ve probably brought in more big men on 10 days after releasing Boogie, but this was also an opportunity to see how viable the Bobby-Giannis pairing was in extended minutes going forward. The Bucks learned last year that you need to experiment in the regular season, winning 60 games doing the same **** every night is great until you get to the playoffs.
I’m not worried about anything the Bucks can control, I’m more worried about what is out of there control (Brook’s health, a big Philly trade, the Nets all getting healthy and cleared to play)
I don’t think our title chances have anything to do with Boogie Cousins.