PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
-
12 Point Buck
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,299
- And1: 194
- Joined: Jun 30, 2005
- Location: MKE
-
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
Good Night.
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
-
skones
- RealGM
- Posts: 37,108
- And1: 17,267
- Joined: Jul 20, 2004
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
MickeyDavis wrote:Unfortunately can't pay Bev much and another contender will be able to pay him more. No one will be dumb enough to give him the stupid Tucker contract but he deserves more than we can pay.
He signed with Philly for the minimum....
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
- raferfenix
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,263
- And1: 4,582
- Joined: Apr 05, 2003
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
dbrodz7 wrote:I just received devastating news, game 7 is during my wife’s birthday party.
Sorry about your divorce.
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
-
12 Point Buck
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,299
- And1: 194
- Joined: Jun 30, 2005
- Location: MKE
-
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
ShootingtheJ wrote:buckboy wrote:-Jragon- wrote:
While on topic... would you pay 2 yrs - 12 mil? Player option? Lol go Bucks. He's proven he can start, he can finish, he can do the Jrue D role
Doesn't matter, they can't pay him that much.
Nor do they need to. He's a minimum salary guy now. He's burned too many bridges to have any kind of market. Not completely his fault, he's had some bad teammates who don't care about winning.
Most importantly, in the the playoffs, he's every bit as good as Jrue now. That's fun.
sweet dreams to that
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
-
-Jragon-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,617
- And1: 2,332
- Joined: Nov 07, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
buckboy wrote:-Jragon- wrote:tydett wrote:
It is insane how much he fits this team and our needs. He's what fans think Bobby is (who was also really good tonight).
While on topic... would you pay 2 yrs - 12 mil? Player option? Lol go Bucks. He's proven he can start, he can finish, he can do the Jrue D role
Doesn't matter, they can't pay him that much.
There's usually space... we signed Beas AND Payne last yr
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
-
BigO
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,337
- And1: 4,880
- Joined: Jul 07, 2014
- Location: Old Folks Home
-
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
If this is the first time in NBA history that a team won a game without their two leading scorers, it's hard to think they could do that two games in a row.
Need Giannis back or it's Pacers in 6. With both back, a championship is possible.
Need Giannis back or it's Pacers in 6. With both back, a championship is possible.
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
-
-Jragon-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,617
- And1: 2,332
- Joined: Nov 07, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
12 Point Buck wrote:ShootingtheJ wrote:buckboy wrote:
Doesn't matter, they can't pay him that much.
Nor do they need to. He's a minimum salary guy now. He's burned too many bridges to have any kind of market. Not completely his fault, he's had some bad teammates who don't care about winning.
Most importantly, in the the playoffs, he's every bit as good as Jrue now. That's fun.
sweet dreams to that
Great if we get him for less... feels like he'd want more though somehow
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
- raferfenix
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,263
- And1: 4,582
- Joined: Apr 05, 2003
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
-
-Jragon-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,617
- And1: 2,332
- Joined: Nov 07, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
BigO wrote:If this is the first time in NBA history that a team won a game without their two leading scorers, it's hard to think they could do that two games in a row.
Need Giannis back or it's Pacers in 6. With both back, a championship is possible.
Indy will be jacked for a game 6 elimination at home hhh
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
-
12 Point Buck
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,299
- And1: 194
- Joined: Jun 30, 2005
- Location: MKE
-
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
-Jragon- wrote:BigO wrote:If this is the first time in NBA history that a team won a game without their two leading scorers, it's hard to think they could do that two games in a row.
Need Giannis back or it's Pacers in 6. With both back, a championship is possible.
Indy will be jacked for a game 6 elimination at home hhh
go to bed
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
- blazza18
- RealGM
- Posts: 56,873
- And1: 29,666
- Joined: Dec 02, 2010
- Location: Upside Down
-
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
ShootingtheJ wrote:Bobby seriously outplayed Siakam. If Siakam is worth 3 1st round picks, how many more is Bobby worth?
oh, brother
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
- drew881
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,835
- And1: 5,628
- Joined: Aug 14, 2007
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
Obviously want Giannis and Dame coming back but big worries about them coming back in an elimination game on the road and seeing us be out if sorts. Don’t have any room for error here.
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
- Bernman
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,901
- And1: 8,404
- Joined: Aug 05, 2004
-
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
Some players really nutted up tonight. Going to need another one from Bobby to atone for game 4 & the rest of the series. Midds is extracting everything he has from those creaky legs. God bless him.
The Bucks pressed up on their shooters more, as the game went on. Early it was more of the same. Don't unnecessarily double. If you get beat, you get beat. Don't give up easy switches for mismatches. Don't know how Bease kept getting matched up down low. It was improved, but can be better, and might need to with their crowd behind them.
The offense was good, once we could get in the halfcourt. Bev getting penetration, Bobby & Khris working mismatches, and guys hitting outside shots off that. There should be a policy only Bev, Pat, Bease, & AJJ bring the ball up.
I may whip out Giannis for game 6, if he's functional. Otherwise don't risk it. Definitely don't test Dame's achilles. His injury would be even more devastating. If the Bucks can somehow make it out this series, I think they win the title. It'd give perspective.
The Bucks pressed up on their shooters more, as the game went on. Early it was more of the same. Don't unnecessarily double. If you get beat, you get beat. Don't give up easy switches for mismatches. Don't know how Bease kept getting matched up down low. It was improved, but can be better, and might need to with their crowd behind them.
The offense was good, once we could get in the halfcourt. Bev getting penetration, Bobby & Khris working mismatches, and guys hitting outside shots off that. There should be a policy only Bev, Pat, Bease, & AJJ bring the ball up.
I may whip out Giannis for game 6, if he's functional. Otherwise don't risk it. Definitely don't test Dame's achilles. His injury would be even more devastating. If the Bucks can somehow make it out this series, I think they win the title. It'd give perspective.
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
- MickeyDavis
- Global Mod

- Posts: 105,136
- And1: 57,191
- Joined: May 02, 2002
- Location: The Craps Table
-
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
skones wrote:MickeyDavis wrote:Unfortunately can't pay Bev much and another contender will be able to pay him more. No one will be dumb enough to give him the stupid Tucker contract but he deserves more than we can pay.
He signed with Philly for the minimum....
That's right, I thought it was more.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
- Baddy Chuck
- RealGM
- Posts: 51,406
- And1: 25,599
- Joined: Apr 18, 2006
-
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
skones wrote:MickeyDavis wrote:Unfortunately can't pay Bev much and another contender will be able to pay him more. No one will be dumb enough to give him the stupid Tucker contract but he deserves more than we can pay.
He signed with Philly for the minimum....
On his podcast he said he gave LAC the chance to sign him for the minimum too and they didn't. Money might be running dry but **** it give him a parade, give him some podcast sponsors, whatever it takes.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
- RiotPunch
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,933
- And1: 18,285
- Joined: Jul 05, 2009
- Location: LA
-
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
Props to Bobby for owning up and showing some humility. It wasn't always pretty but we needed him tonight and he showed out.
#FreeChuckDiesel
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
- RiotPunch
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,933
- And1: 18,285
- Joined: Jul 05, 2009
- Location: LA
-
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
MiltownMadness wrote:humanrefutation wrote:
Nah this dude is obnoxious...really ruined the game for lots of people. Literally just screaming facebook responses into the mic the whole game
Is that you dbrodz? Lol.
#FreeChuckDiesel
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
- MickeyDavis
- Global Mod

- Posts: 105,136
- And1: 57,191
- Joined: May 02, 2002
- Location: The Craps Table
-
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
-
dbrodz7
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,862
- And1: 1,495
- Joined: Apr 15, 2008
-
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
RiotPunch wrote:MiltownMadness wrote:humanrefutation wrote:
Nah this dude is obnoxious...really ruined the game for lots of people. Literally just screaming facebook responses into the mic the whole game
Is that you dbrodz? Lol.
No, that’s not me. I’m not convinced people could hear me on tv based on the one video I was sent. I was about one section over from the main center court tv camera, I’m really loud and don’t take many possessions off so I thought it was possible.
Misery loves company
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
-
dbrodz7
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,862
- And1: 1,495
- Joined: Apr 15, 2008
-
Re: PG Pacers Game 5 - Big Win
That Doc interview tonight was a great listen. I’m not sure if he got weird about the Giannis and Dame injuries because they’re close or he’s not sure how much gamesmanship he needs to do in the media because they’re not close. I tend to think it’s the latter but am delusionally optimistic for the former.
Misery loves company









