crkone wrote:Let Livingston cook in Bobby's place.
I agree with this.
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
crkone wrote:Let Livingston cook in Bobby's place.
fansinceforever wrote:crkone wrote:Let Livingston cook in Bobby's place.
I agree with this.
-Jragon- wrote:fansinceforever wrote:crkone wrote:Let Livingston cook in Bobby's place.
I agree with this.
When did Liv get better than Smith
Yeah I was mainly thinking defensively as he's theoretically more switchable than Smith and rebounds well for his size.fansinceforever wrote:-Jragon- wrote:fansinceforever wrote:
I agree with this.
When did Liv get better than Smith
I think Livingston can theoretically hold his position and provide a little bit more resistance defensively.
But sure, try both. Just get Bobby out of here and get anything of value in.
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
ShootingtheJ wrote:-Jragon- wrote:soxperry wrote:
I think the problem is that Giannis is at his best when he can just focus on Giannis and vice versa for Dame. They are both used to shouldering a humongous load.
True, you can still satisfy it though. When one hits a couple shots, keep going back to him for a stretch of possessions to get that "on fire" feeling
Problem is, this only addresses the offense. Championship teams also play defense, which is impossible with Dame.
Move Dame to Miami, where he can hide in a lazy zone, and get buckets without Championship expectations.
trwi7 wrote:**** me deep, Giannis. ****. Me. Deep.
Bernman wrote:The teams that Brook projects to be playable against in the playoffs are disproportionately in the west - minny (gobert), Sacto (sabonis), nuggets (jokic), suns (nurkic), thunder (hartenstein). It's most of them.
The east in the opposite. It's predominantly shooters &/or athletes. That's a problem. Why Brook may have more value to another team. A similar equation is true for Bobby, cuz of his lack of footspeed & our perimeter d. But we need to get a big or 2 back.
trwi7 wrote:**** me deep, Giannis. ****. Me. Deep.
GoldenAntlers wrote:A lot of the Bobby rebounds are when the other teams' whole squad is running back on defense after a missed shot and our guards let him grab it.msiris wrote:Bobby was out and someone else cleaned the glass. Rebounding stats ae a little overrated. Defense is more valuable.
trwi7 wrote:**** me deep, Giannis. ****. Me. Deep.
jschligs wrote:Am I the only one who doesn't know who the **** SupremeHustle is?
-Jragon- wrote:Correct me if there is a stat to refute this, but the thing I see with Brook is that 90% of the time he's helping you somehow still. Size, screens, boxouts, tapouts, blocks, shot challenges, big man dunk denials.....
When Bobby or KM are off on their shot you get nothing
soxperry wrote:-Jragon- wrote:Correct me if there is a stat to refute this, but the thing I see with Brook is that 90% of the time he's helping you somehow still. Size, screens, boxouts, tapouts, blocks, shot challenges, big man dunk denials.....
When Bobby or KM are off on their shot you get nothing
Khris provides playmaking even when his shot isnt falling. He's excellent at setting guys like Giannis and Brook up for extremely high percentage looks. He just kind of coordinates the offense. Defensively, Khris at least knows where to be and has some tact. Bobby is lost frequently and has zero defensive tact.
These two things are not remotely the same.
When you play good D it leads to rebounds. D leads to rebounding Rebounding is not hard. Prince did it last night. Got to want to do it. That's why rebounding will not suffer if Bobby is traded. The D won't suffer as well. Scoring might suffer but he wants an extention and my personal opinion its time to move on for the right package.BigO wrote:GoldenAntlers wrote:Or "rebounds are overrated, because defense is more important"? Any coach will tell you that defensive rebounding is part of playing defense, so separating the two is absurd.msiris wrote:Bobby was out and someone else cleaned the glass. Rebounding stats ae a little overrated. Defense is more valuable.
SupremeHustle wrote:We can fight for 4th seed, but we desperately need a point guard (to play WITH Dame), and we need Khris back if we want to do anything in the postseason.
I was an early believer in Rollins. I think he will be a real NBA player, hopefully for the Bucks. But I wouldn't mind bringing in a more experienced PG who Dame can share the court with. Fultz, Flynn, maybe Dennis Smith. Maybe my guy Kira Lewis. Dame is more of a two than a one these days. Maybe he's always been a Steve Francis-type. I dunno.
And we still need a young, energy big. Bro doesn't even need to be a real offensive threat. Just hustle, block some shots, run the court like Dan Gadzuric in a contract year, catch a lob or two. There's gotta be one out there somewhere. Is Olivier Sarr any good? Moses Brown? HELP!
-Jragon- wrote:soxperry wrote:-Jragon- wrote:Correct me if there is a stat to refute this, but the thing I see with Brook is that 90% of the time he's helping you somehow still. Size, screens, boxouts, tapouts, blocks, shot challenges, big man dunk denials.....
When Bobby or KM are off on their shot you get nothing
Khris provides playmaking even when his shot isnt falling. He's excellent at setting guys like Giannis and Brook up for extremely high percentage looks. He just kind of coordinates the offense. Defensively, Khris at least knows where to be and has some tact. Bobby is lost frequently and has zero defensive tact.
These two things are not remotely the same.
For Khris, for every decent pass he has (I never saw a great one; he's not J Kidd), doesn't his forced dribbles and sloppy pass turnovers even that out? Everytime he's playmaking that means Giannis and Dame aren't? Didn't it look like GTJ showed that flash last night that he can do it even more efficiently and smoother? KM is a 1 trick pony in my view
trwi7 wrote:**** me deep, Giannis. ****. Me. Deep.
No denying that but he never sees the floor and he is extremely injury prone. Has not been worth his last contract.-Jragon- wrote:KM's 1 trick is pretty impressive though... how many guys can get above .600 TS% while shooting mostly long 2's and not getting to the line very much? Before the 3 pointer was this popular it probably was more common.
SupremeHustle wrote:We can fight for 4th seed, but we desperately need a point guard (to play WITH Dame), and we need Khris back if we want to do anything in the postseason.
I was an early believer in Rollins. I think he will be a real NBA player, hopefully for the Bucks. But I wouldn't mind bringing in a more experienced PG who Dame can share the court with. Fultz, Flynn, maybe Dennis Smith. Maybe my guy Kira Lewis. Dame is more of a two than a one these days. Maybe he's always been a Steve Francis-type. I dunno.
And we still need a young, energy big. Bro doesn't even need to be a real offensive threat. Just hustle, block some shots, run the court like Dan Gadzuric in a contract year, catch a lob or two. There's gotta be one out there somewhere. Is Olivier Sarr any good? Moses Brown? HELP!
-Jragon- wrote:soxperry wrote:-Jragon- wrote:Correct me if there is a stat to refute this, but the thing I see with Brook is that 90% of the time he's helping you somehow still. Size, screens, boxouts, tapouts, blocks, shot challenges, big man dunk denials.....
When Bobby or KM are off on their shot you get nothing
Khris provides playmaking even when his shot isnt falling. He's excellent at setting guys like Giannis and Brook up for extremely high percentage looks. He just kind of coordinates the offense. Defensively, Khris at least knows where to be and has some tact. Bobby is lost frequently and has zero defensive tact.
These two things are not remotely the same.
For Khris, for every decent pass he has (I never saw a great one; he's not J Kidd), doesn't his forced dribbles and sloppy pass turnovers even that out? Everytime he's playmaking that means Giannis and Dame aren't? Didn't it look like GTJ showed that flash last night that he can do it even more efficiently and smoother? KM is a 1 trick pony in my view