soxperry wrote:machu46 wrote:soxperry wrote:
There is absolutely no way we are trading the 1st in that scenario. Just not happening
I certainly hope not, but I don't think it's impossible that we would. Washington has essentially zero incentive to make the trade unless we include the pick. With Kuzma's contract declining in the future on top of simply not being that expensive to begin with, they don't really have any reason to trade him unless they get an asset that can be useful down the line. Now the puck would almost certainly be protected to some degree, and again, I'm hoping this is not the direction we go in, but if we do trade Middleton for him, I wouldn't be surprised if the first round pick is involved.
The pick cant be protected, really, because we cannot create trade language that offers a pick in a year further than 31. So the most we can do is protect it for 1-whatever and then it becomes our 31 2nd if it doesn't convey. Not very enticing to anyone. We could trade it for multiple firsts and then give them one, maybe, but that still feels gross.
Anyway, i do get your point, but what is the Bucks incentive to swap Khris for Kuzma? To get below the 2nd apron? Then why not just send Pat and a first to whoever and keep Khris?
I think the only reason this is perplexing is because we are giving credence to what is likely a bull rumor.
I think there's a decent chance nothing ultimately comes of this, but I'm taking it a little more seriously than I usually would because I seem to remember us showing interest in Kuzma last year too.
Again, I can't say I endorse this move personally. But if I try to come up with reasons for why we might be interested, I would say the following:
1. The luxury tax reasons. Given our status as a repeater tax team, Middleton's contract costs the owners a ton of money and beyond that, getting under the second apron opens up a lot of avenues for us that aren't currently available.
2. The player reasons. Kuzma theoretically makes sense as a player type that we'd be interested in, granted it requires a lot of hand-waving away his recent play. We've been desperate for bigger wings that can theoretically defend guys like Tatum in the playoffs. Kuzma is certainly not a stopper but he does have the frame for it and he's not as bad a defender as his reputation on this board is. Middleton has a similar frame but obviously has lost a ton of his athleticism at this point and will likely only decline further moving forwards. Kuzma's rebounding has declined a ton the last couple years with Washington, but historically, he's shown much more ability to help in that area than Middleton and rebounding has been another issue for us. Offensively, he's been an absolute disaster this season and isn't really anything special in general, but if you can convince yourself he'll take smarter shots/have better shots available to him as a Buck, he theoretically has a pretty well-rounded skillset. He's always been a good finisher at the rim and has generally been an okay-ish 3 point shooter when given clean looks. And unlike most of our guys that specialize in catch-and-shoot jumpers and nothing else, he is capable of being the primary shot creator if he's in a lineup with bench guys. Again, this part requires quite a leap of faith because he's been objectively horrific this season and you'd be asking him to change the way he plays in a lot of ways to fit into a team concept more than he has in Washington.
In a more ideal scenario, if we could include Pat in this sort of trade and essentially get off the Middleton and Pat contracts all with one first, that would make it more palatable to me but no idea if that's really possible or realistic.