Ron Swanson wrote:ShootingtheJ wrote:Ron Swanson wrote:
What theoretical trade are we talking about? The one where we pin all our hopes on Tari Eason turning into Paul George? I like both him and Cam Johnson a lot, but those dudes are 100% supplemental offensive players. You're quite clearly just replacing Dame with Schroder as the only other shot-creator/play-maker outside of Giannis and the 30-50 games that Khris inevitably suits up for. Pretty sure the offense would be an abject disaster.
Abject disaster? Come back to Earth. Our offense wasn't a disaster with Jrue and Grayson. We won a Ship with Jrue and PJ as the starting back court. Giannis has gotten his teammates great shots in every playoff series he played in. Imagine Giannis, instead of passing to slow release 6'4" dudes, if he instead was passing to career 6'8" 43% playoff 3 point shooter Cam Johnson.
The postseason offense absolutely was a disaster with that backcourt for the majority of the last two Bud years lol. The regular season offense was able to outperform their talent level in those years because Bud was a scheme wizard, and Khris was a consistently reliable 20/6/5 sidekick giving you 60-70 games. Those things are long gone, so I'm not really convinced that you're understanding how steep a drop off it is exchanging Dame for Schroder and a couple catch and shoot guys who can't create for themselves (99% of Eason's and 97% of Cam's career 3PT makes are assisted...).
Are you saying the offense wasn't good enough with Giannis out? Well yeah, of course. We've also seen the team isn't good enough in the playoffs with Dame and no Giannis, the team was awful with Dame on the floor.
The only way you're winning in the playoffs without Giannis (or Khris) is by playing defense, and that's not an option with Dame.















