Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)

ShootingtheJ · Post #161 » by **ShootingtheJ** » Sun Jun 30, 2019 10:58 pm

Another possible trade target with the TPE is Robert Covington. T-wolves trying to create room.

James1980 · Post #162 » by **James1980** » Sun Jun 30, 2019 10:58 pm

Let him sign a deal with another team and match or don't match.

rrayy wrote:
James1980 wrote:Bucks don't know how restricted free agency works

Sent from my SM-G965U using RealGM mobile app
Brogdon likely doesn't want to be in Milwaukee. If he won't sign with Milwaukee, would you rather him walk for nothing?

Sent from my SM-G965U using RealGM mobile app

Je K · Post #163 » by **Je K** » Sun Jun 30, 2019 10:58 pm

SupremeHustle wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:
LuessiT wrote:
Am I the only one who thinks this one was really good?

No, I think it was really good.

I'm right there with you guys. The Bucks are in a position to facilitate. Teams will need us.

I'm with you guys. Very interested to see what this TPE is used for.

If we weren't willing to pay Brogdon that much, then get a return for him (and send him to a non-contender)

Post #164 » by **MickeyDavis** » Sun Jun 30, 2019 10:58 pm

If this means another productive move then that's fine. If not...

Post #165 » by **humanrefutation** » Sun Jun 30, 2019 10:58 pm

M-C-G wrote:
LuessiT wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:
No, I think it was really good.

Guess we're pretty alone on that island but I feel very confident with that take. We got a big return for a guy who wanted out and we weren't going to bring back.

I love Brogdon and would have prioritized him ahead of Middleton. But I like the return and don’t think someone should fully judge this move until after we see if we can acquire something with the TPE

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The return is fine for a guy you don't plan to bring back. The question is why we didn't bring him back if we were actually all-in on running it back.

LuessiT · Post #166 » by **LuessiT** » Sun Jun 30, 2019 10:59 pm

skones wrote:
SupremeHustle wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:
No, I think it was really good.

I'm right there with you guys. The Bucks are in a position to facilitate. Teams will need us.

Like, say, Houston shedding salary for Jimmy Butler? Where we replace Brogdon with Eric Gordon?

If we don't give up a pick there, that would be nice.

James1980 · Post #167 » by **James1980** » Sun Jun 30, 2019 10:59 pm

Billonaire Owners don't want to pay tax

Ruben Quevedo wrote:
skones wrote:
Ruben Quevedo wrote:Can we trade for Beal with those assets?

Not large enough.

What about jrue holiday?

Sent from my SM-G965U using RealGM mobile app

theFireBlanket · Post #168 » by **theFireBlanket** » Sun Jun 30, 2019 10:59 pm

raferfenix wrote:So that Bledsoe extension looking more and more suspect in the context of making this kind of call with Brogdon.

Plenty of time for the front office to prove this is the right call. But if it's due to LED not wanting to pay luxury tax...

Bledsoe wanted to be here. Malcolm is the guy rumored to openly want out all season.

raferfenix · Post #169 » by **raferfenix** » Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:00 pm

A 3-point bomber like Eric Gordon sure would take the sting out of losing Brogdon.

Not sure I'd want to trade our new-found first round pick for a guy with only a year left on his contract. But he'd be a hell of a fit.

Iheartfootball · Post #170 » by **Iheartfootball** » Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:00 pm

I don’t know how this will work out in the end. But it’s more exciting then bringing everyone back. I’d rather have Brogdon at that amount than Kris at his max contract though. But again, who knows what those assets turn into?

Grade: incomplete

Licensed to Il · Post #171 » by **Licensed to Il** » Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:00 pm

Some of you sure enjoy prancing around with bees in your bonnets.

brewbucks · Post #172 » by **brewbucks** » Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:00 pm

Some bull

TroyD92 · Post #173 » by **TroyD92** » Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:00 pm

I doubt there's much protection on that pick right? maybe top five or so?

LuessiT · Post #174 » by **LuessiT** » Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:00 pm

James1980 wrote:Let him sign a deal with another team and match or don't match.

That would have been terrible though. Means you don't get a TPE so you have no avenue of replacing him.

crkone · Post #175 » by **crkone** » Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:00 pm

humanrefutation wrote:
M-C-G wrote:
LuessiT wrote:
Guess we're pretty alone on that island but I feel very confident with that take. We got a big return for a guy who wanted out and we weren't going to bring back.

I love Brogdon and would have prioritized him ahead of Middleton. But I like the return and don’t think someone should fully judge this move until after we see if we can acquire something with the TPE

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The return is fine for a guy you don't plan to bring back. The question is why we didn't bring him back if we were actually all-in on running it back.

We can all wonder why but Brogdon never once commented on wanting to be in Milwaukee, unlike Brook, Hill, Lopez, Giannis, Bledsoe, etc all before they signed new contracts.

JEIS · Post #176 » by **JEIS** » Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:00 pm

Maybe we get a better player than Brogdon?

M-C-G · Post #177 » by **M-C-G** » Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:00 pm

humanrefutation wrote:
M-C-G wrote:
LuessiT wrote:
Guess we're pretty alone on that island but I feel very confident with that take. We got a big return for a guy who wanted out and we weren't going to bring back.

I love Brogdon and would have prioritized him ahead of Middleton. But I like the return and don’t think someone should fully judge this move until after we see if we can acquire something with the TPE

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The return is fine for a guy you don't plan to bring back. The question is why we didn't bring him back if we were actually all-in on running it back.

Four year fully guaranteed deal who was a bit of a product of the scheme and injury prone.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Matches Malone · Post #178 » by **Matches Malone** » Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:01 pm

Would be interested to know if the training staff had any input in this decision and think his foot is a major red flag.

Perishable517 · Post #179 » by **Perishable517** » Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:01 pm

Bucksfan28 wrote:Wanted to bring everyone back but I'm happy with the return.

Yah, this doesn't bother me all that much. That is big money for a player who hasn't been able to finish out a season healthy.

Sent from my HTC U11 using RealGM mobile app

TroyD92 · Post #180 » by **TroyD92** » Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:01 pm

theFireBlanket wrote:
raferfenix wrote:So that Bledsoe extension looking more and more suspect in the context of making this kind of call with Brogdon.

Plenty of time for the front office to prove this is the right call. But if it's due to LED not wanting to pay luxury tax...

Bledsoe wanted to be here. Malcolm is the guy rumored to openly want out all season.

Now he gets to go to Indiana which is one of the worst states in the country.