ImageImage

Bucks sign Forbes!

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

higharc
Junior
Posts: 396
And1: 284
Joined: Mar 26, 2018
 

Re: Bucks sign Forbes! 

Post#161 » by higharc » Mon Nov 23, 2020 6:22 pm

I'm not saying it should be our default 2nd unit backcourt, but that we will see sporadic such lineups.

Granted, I should have written "definitely sometimes see it". :D
User avatar
buckboy
RealGM
Posts: 13,175
And1: 8,556
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: At the Gettin' Place
     

Re: Bucks sign Forbes! 

Post#162 » by buckboy » Mon Nov 23, 2020 6:24 pm

craig wrote:Thanks, Grey, helpful perspective. Very helpful.


I read this as "Thanks, Gery, helpful perspective." and thought that can't be right.
"This is my home, this is my city...I'm blessed to be a part of the Milwaukee Bucks for the next 5 years. Let's make these years count. The show goes on, let's get it."
User avatar
buckboy
RealGM
Posts: 13,175
And1: 8,556
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: At the Gettin' Place
     

Re: Bucks sign Forbes! 

Post#163 » by buckboy » Mon Nov 23, 2020 6:29 pm

JayMKE wrote:is it Brin or Brian?

Brin
"This is my home, this is my city...I'm blessed to be a part of the Milwaukee Bucks for the next 5 years. Let's make these years count. The show goes on, let's get it."
User avatar
tedbrogen
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,261
And1: 3,779
Joined: Jun 20, 2008

Re: Bucks sign Forbes! 

Post#164 » by tedbrogen » Mon Nov 23, 2020 6:44 pm

higharc wrote:Augustine and Forbes will definitely play together in 2nd units. And we will be fine because 2nd units just need to keep the point difference while the starters rest.

But the big thing is that we can always plug him in the game when we need a bucket to unlock us from an offensive slump. Same as we did with Corver, but better (not because he is a career better shooter but because Bucks Kyle was so old).


Agreed on the second point. Korver definitely was no longer elite coming off screens. He was just not quick enough to get around the screen and get fully set up to consistently be a threat. He was still elite when left wide open but that's all he was for the Bucks, a guy that could bury wide open threes. Give those screen plays to Forbes and the team has a way to really stress the defense. The Heat just made the finals by running a couple great shooters around screens forcing defenses to over-react to protect against that which lead to tons of easy looks for everyone else.
User avatar
tedbrogen
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,261
And1: 3,779
Joined: Jun 20, 2008

Re: Bucks sign Forbes! 

Post#165 » by tedbrogen » Mon Nov 23, 2020 6:48 pm

Ron Swanson wrote:Think we'd all love a lineup of 5 guys who can defend, pass, and shoot above 36% on 3's. Absent that luxury, Forbes is a guy you can mix and match when you go small. Putting him in Holiday/DDV/Middleton/Giannis lineups loses you next to nothing defensively. This is also why I'm not a fan of overpaying one-dimensional 3PT flame-thrower types when you can dig up guys like Forbes on the minimum. Let other teams break the bank for Joe Harris and Davis Bertans when I can get the 80% version of them for free just because he's 6 inches shorter.


Another factor in this is if you break the bank for Harris or Bertans, it's a lot harder to bench them if they are getting destroyed on defense. Teams are still going to attack those types of players. If Forbes is getting beat so bad it is compromising the entire defense, it's easy to pull him for someone else. That becomes a lot more difficult when it's a highly paid guy. We saw that with Bledsoe.
coolhandluke121
RealGM
Posts: 14,298
And1: 7,447
Joined: Sep 23, 2007

Re: Bucks sign Forbes! 

Post#166 » by coolhandluke121 » Mon Nov 23, 2020 7:18 pm

After watching his highlights, I see a slightly shorter Gary Neal. He plays and even shoots at the exact same speed and has the same body. That's not a bad thing at all for what they paid.
Wut we've got here is... faaailure... to communakate.
User avatar
drone3
Head Coach
Posts: 6,420
And1: 3,056
Joined: Sep 10, 2015

Re: Bucks sign Forbes! 

Post#167 » by drone3 » Tue Nov 24, 2020 6:02 am

Bryn looking a little like Curry in this one, check DTB's vivid description.

User avatar
Pachinko_
RealGM
Posts: 20,693
And1: 23,985
Joined: Jun 13, 2016
 

Re: Bucks sign Forbes! 

Post#168 » by Pachinko_ » Tue Nov 24, 2020 10:07 am

I can see how he can annoy you as an opponent
ShootingtheJ
RealGM
Posts: 11,691
And1: 7,329
Joined: Jun 20, 2010

Re: Bucks sign Forbes! 

Post#169 » by ShootingtheJ » Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:16 pm

Brewhoopfan wrote:Forbes is a rich man's Matt Thomas. I'm looking forward to seeing him come off the bench and fire away.


I'd rather have Matt Thomas.

Merrill will eventually displace Forbes.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,739
And1: 29,961
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: Bucks sign Forbes! 

Post#170 » by paulpressey25 » Tue Nov 24, 2020 2:34 pm

tedbrogen wrote:Agreed on the second point. Korver definitely was no longer elite coming off screens. He was just not quick enough to get around the screen and get fully set up to consistently be a threat.


Agree 100% with this on Korver. Also agree with your second post on pricetag. I have no idea what the Wizards were thinking in paying Bertans all that money. Compare what we paid Lopez, who can actually defend and provide interior scoring. It was 2016 all over again, with 7th to 10th men getting paid big.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
User avatar
buckboy
RealGM
Posts: 13,175
And1: 8,556
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: At the Gettin' Place
     

Re: Bucks sign Forbes! 

Post#171 » by buckboy » Tue Nov 24, 2020 2:53 pm

coolhandluke121 wrote:After watching his highlights, I see a slightly shorter Gary Neal. He plays and even shoots at the exact same speed and has the same body. That's not a bad thing at all for what they paid.


Better shooter on way higher 3 point volume. Which is the most important thing for this team.

I like this signing a lot. Especially at the minuscule price.
"This is my home, this is my city...I'm blessed to be a part of the Milwaukee Bucks for the next 5 years. Let's make these years count. The show goes on, let's get it."
coolhandluke121
RealGM
Posts: 14,298
And1: 7,447
Joined: Sep 23, 2007

Re: Bucks sign Forbes! 

Post#172 » by coolhandluke121 » Tue Nov 24, 2020 4:38 pm

buckboy wrote:
coolhandluke121 wrote:After watching his highlights, I see a slightly shorter Gary Neal. He plays and even shoots at the exact same speed and has the same body. That's not a bad thing at all for what they paid.


Better shooter on way higher 3 point volume. Which is the most important thing for this team.

I like this signing a lot. Especially at the minuscule price.


Define "way higher"? In the same mpg, he has 4.1 attempts per game and Neal had 3.4, mostly before the 3-pointer completely exploded. 38.2% vs. 40% isn't that big of a difference. That difference is probably well within each player's standard deviation from year to year.

Most importantly, they probably both stink at just about everything else. Wes was a far superior player. I'm glad they signed Forbes as a specialist, but like Augustin he probably causes just as many problems as he solves, if not more. Big downgrade from Hill and Wes, unfortunately.
Wut we've got here is... faaailure... to communakate.
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 25,953
And1: 29,897
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Bucks sign Forbes! 

Post#173 » by Ron Swanson » Tue Nov 24, 2020 5:14 pm

He's a better pure shooter than Wes and I'm not sure it's even debatable. Obviously nowhere near the defender, but Wes shooting off the bounce is largely a disaster that you want to avoid. Forbes can pull-up and come off screens to get clean, efficient looks. He's more than just a catch and shoot guy.
agiaco
Analyst
Posts: 3,726
And1: 1,161
Joined: Jun 26, 2009

Re: Bucks sign Forbes! 

Post#174 » by agiaco » Tue Nov 24, 2020 11:31 pm

Ron Swanson wrote:He's a better pure shooter than Wes and I'm not sure it's even debatable. Obviously nowhere near the defender, but Wes shooting off the bounce is largely a disaster that you want to avoid. Forbes can pull-up and come off screens to get clean, efficient looks. He's more than just a catch and shoot guy.


Wes was overrated for the role he had with the Bucks. Think Forbes will be a nice addition.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Bucks sign Forbes! 

Post#175 » by Ruzious » Tue Nov 24, 2020 11:49 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:
tedbrogen wrote:Agreed on the second point. Korver definitely was no longer elite coming off screens. He was just not quick enough to get around the screen and get fully set up to consistently be a threat.


Agree 100% with this on Korver. Also agree with your second post on pricetag. I have no idea what the Wizards were thinking in paying Bertans all that money. Compare what we paid Lopez, who can actually defend and provide interior scoring. It was 2016 all over again, with 7th to 10th men getting paid big.

It's hard to compare Lopez to Bertans, because they're completely different players. And remember Lopez used to be considered a terrible defender before he came to Milwaukee. Bertans' value is that he's a 6'10 player that you have to guard all the way out to 30 feet on each possession. He's one of the top shooters in the world. And if you believe Washington's GM, he's a very good transition defender.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
drone3
Head Coach
Posts: 6,420
And1: 3,056
Joined: Sep 10, 2015

Re: Bucks sign Forbes! 

Post#176 » by drone3 » Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:04 am

agiaco wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote:He's a better pure shooter than Wes and I'm not sure it's even debatable. Obviously nowhere near the defender, but Wes shooting off the bounce is largely a disaster that you want to avoid. Forbes can pull-up and come off screens to get clean, efficient looks. He's more than just a catch and shoot guy.


Wes was overrated for the role he had with the Bucks. Think Forbes will be a nice addition.
Excited to have Forbes, one of the best shooters in the league, he is also quick and can get to the rim with the right match up.

Wes was overrated on offense but he could guard 2s or 3s, versatile defender. I'm not sure if Forbes can guard anything.
User avatar
buckboy
RealGM
Posts: 13,175
And1: 8,556
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: At the Gettin' Place
     

Re: Bucks sign Forbes! 

Post#177 » by buckboy » Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:09 am

coolhandluke121 wrote:
buckboy wrote:
coolhandluke121 wrote:After watching his highlights, I see a slightly shorter Gary Neal. He plays and even shoots at the exact same speed and has the same body. That's not a bad thing at all for what they paid.


Better shooter on way higher 3 point volume. Which is the most important thing for this team.

I like this signing a lot. Especially at the minuscule price.


Define "way higher"? In the same mpg, he has 4.1 attempts per game and Neal had 3.4, mostly before the 3-pointer completely exploded. 38.2% vs. 40% isn't that big of a difference. That difference is probably well within each player's standard deviation from year to year.

Most importantly, they probably both stink at just about everything else. Wes was a far superior player. I'm glad they signed Forbes as a specialist, but like Augustin he probably causes just as many problems as he solves, if not more. Big downgrade from Hill and Wes, unfortunately.


5 and 6 3PA last 2 seasons. Significantly higher than Neal's career high.

I realize the game has changed and Neal's may well have come close had he come around 10 years later though.

I would expect Forbes to Jack up at least 10/36 minutes with Giannis Gravity. And hit at least 40% of them. That makes him valuable if he can do it.

I would expect Augustin and Forbes to be better than Hill and Matthews on offense and far worse on defense.

However, I think the defense will be as good or better with Holiday, more minutes for DDV and Craig.
"This is my home, this is my city...I'm blessed to be a part of the Milwaukee Bucks for the next 5 years. Let's make these years count. The show goes on, let's get it."
MVP2110
General Manager
Posts: 8,730
And1: 4,580
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Bucks sign Forbes! 

Post#178 » by MVP2110 » Wed Nov 25, 2020 10:55 pm

Read on Twitter
?s=19
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
User avatar
drone3
Head Coach
Posts: 6,420
And1: 3,056
Joined: Sep 10, 2015

Re: Bucks sign Forbes! 

Post#179 » by drone3 » Thu Nov 26, 2020 1:08 am

Bryn Forbes ranked 616th in Defensive Points Saved and 612th in Player Impact Plus-Minus.

624 players suited up in the NBA this season and he was third in minutes for San Antonio.
GHOSTofSIKMA
RealGM
Posts: 22,754
And1: 8,933
Joined: Jan 21, 2007
Location: NC
     

Re: Bucks sign Forbes! 

Post#180 » by GHOSTofSIKMA » Thu Nov 26, 2020 1:32 am

drone3 wrote:Bryn Forbes ranked 616th in Defensive Points Saved and 612th in Player Impact Plus-Minus.

624 players suited up in the NBA this season and he was third in minutes for San Antonio.

where did he stack up the two previous seasons?

Return to Milwaukee Bucks