2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- DanoMac
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,044
- And1: 4,142
- Joined: Feb 20, 2005
-
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- Nowak008
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,588
- And1: 4,303
- Joined: Jul 07, 2006
- Location: Book Publisher
- Contact:
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
Looks like Angie also agrees with me DSJ >>> Fultz. Angie also drafted Smart...and some of my friends call me Danny....
Am I Danny Angie?
Am I Danny Angie?


John Hammond apologists:
emunney wrote:Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters
THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- Sky Bucks
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,667
- And1: 1,362
- Joined: Jan 05, 2014
- Location: New Bizzle
-
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
The French Frank would be so awesome to have on our team. If he gets passed the Mavs, Horst better be getting on that phone.
#Make'em Believe On Wisconsin
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 62,922
- And1: 41,311
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
Have It All wrote:emunney wrote:M-C-G wrote:
I am admittedly not knowledgeable on Fultz, but if he is this good, why would the Celtics pass on him? And if he was that good, no matter how bad his team mates where, 9 wins? Strength of schedule was 66th in the nation, so there were winnable games. Just something about those two factors that gives me pause, maybe completely unwarranted, but maybe there is some Bo Callahan there.
Think of it this way: they missed the tournament last year and then lost 2 first round picks and a 20 point scorer. Do you know what Anthony Davis' high school record was? Do you care?
They also returned four, four-star recruits.
9-22 is really, really bad. They won two games in the Pac-12, a conference that was pretty abysmal.
I'm not saying it defines Fultz, but it certainly raises some questions as to how much of an impact he can make on his teammates.
Bit of an aside, but where are you getting that the PAC 12 was "pretty abysmal"?
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- Nowak008
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,588
- And1: 4,303
- Joined: Jul 07, 2006
- Location: Book Publisher
- Contact:
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
Did Little Cleo release his draft rankings yet? Or did I miss it?

John Hammond apologists:
emunney wrote:Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters
THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- SirChurros
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,576
- And1: 4,256
- Joined: Apr 02, 2015
-
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
emunney wrote:Have It All wrote:emunney wrote:
Think of it this way: they missed the tournament last year and then lost 2 first round picks and a 20 point scorer. Do you know what Anthony Davis' high school record was? Do you care?
They also returned four, four-star recruits.
9-22 is really, really bad. They won two games in the Pac-12, a conference that was pretty abysmal.
I'm not saying it defines Fultz, but it certainly raises some questions as to how much of an impact he can make on his teammates.
Bit of an aside, but where are you getting that the PAC 12 was "pretty abysmal"?
Worst rated conference of any of the "big" conferences, per KenPom. I'd say that qualifies.
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 62,922
- And1: 41,311
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
Have It All wrote:emunney wrote:Have It All wrote:
They also returned four, four-star recruits.
9-22 is really, really bad. They won two games in the Pac-12, a conference that was pretty abysmal.
I'm not saying it defines Fultz, but it certainly raises some questions as to how much of an impact he can make on his teammates.
Bit of an aside, but where are you getting that the PAC 12 was "pretty abysmal"?
Worst rated conference of any of the "big" conferences, per KenPom. I'd say that qualifies.
I guess you would, since it suits your argument. I don't think there's a big difference between any of the power conferences and the interactions between them are a sliver of an already small population. KenPom is a very admirable attempt to sort chaos.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- VooDoo7
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,953
- And1: 22,257
- Joined: Jan 14, 2012
- Location: WI
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
Nowak008 wrote:Did Little Cleo release his draft rankings yet? Or did I miss it?
Not yet. We're all waiting on pins and needles.
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 62,922
- And1: 41,311
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
VooDoo7 wrote:Nowak008 wrote:Did Little Cleo release his draft rankings yet? Or did I miss it?
Not yet. We're all waiting on pins and needles.
Tier 12
Pinson Needles
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- SirChurros
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,576
- And1: 4,256
- Joined: Apr 02, 2015
-
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
emunney wrote:Have It All wrote:emunney wrote:
Bit of an aside, but where are you getting that the PAC 12 was "pretty abysmal"?
Worst rated conference of any of the "big" conferences, per KenPom. I'd say that qualifies.
I guess you would, since it suits your argument. I don't think there's a big difference between any of the power conferences and the interactions between them are a sliver of an already small population. KenPom is a very admirable attempt to sort chaos.
I mean, just by watching the Pac 12 too, you would have seen that it was not a good conference out of UCLA and Arizona.
Any time your team can win two conference games, that's pretty pathetic.
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- AntetokounmBros
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,253
- And1: 1,269
- Joined: May 26, 2014
-
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
I haven't spent as much time looking at the draft as I usually do, but the top 10 looks really solid. Normally there are a couple guys I just don't like, but I could see them all panning out. I'd say I'm the lowest on Tatum given his #3 projection.
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 62,922
- And1: 41,311
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
Have It All wrote:emunney wrote:Have It All wrote:
Worst rated conference of any of the "big" conferences, per KenPom. I'd say that qualifies.
I guess you would, since it suits your argument. I don't think there's a big difference between any of the power conferences and the interactions between them are a sliver of an already small population. KenPom is a very admirable attempt to sort chaos.
I mean, just by watching the Pac 12 too, you would have seen that it was not a good conference out of UCLA and Arizona.
Any time your team can win two conference games, that's pretty pathetic.
He has Washington as an above average team. How does this affect your KenPom emotion?
UCLA and U of A were bad now? K, good luck with that. How was Oregon? Also bad?
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- SupremeHustle
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,424
- And1: 30,982
- Joined: Feb 11, 2005
- Location: Cloud 9
-
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
According to the mock draft I'm watching on NBA TV, every player drafted is a stud and will be awesome so we're good.
(They picked Giles for us)
(They picked Giles for us)
jschligs wrote:Am I the only one who doesn't know who the **** SupremeHustle is?
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
-
- Junior
- Posts: 298
- And1: 37
- Joined: Jun 14, 2010
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
The only thing I would want more than getting Bam and Oliver in this draft is Ntilinka slipping to us or moving up to get DSJ or Monk. Like I said before, I have never been so excited about picking this late in the draftfore. I still think that some of the players in our range would could go in the top 5 in most drafts based on potential. I would be ok with Giles, Allen, Anigbogu, or even Leaf. I do not want Raab or Mitchell. Would someone please sell me on Mitchell. I see an excellent defender but not much else. I can see the Steve Francis comparisons with DSJ but that is definitely one chance I'm willing to take. Some of you guys totally sold me on him. I now think he will be one of the top three players in this draft.
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 62,922
- And1: 41,311
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
To my eyes, Giles was the worst player in Duke's rotation in every game I saw. I just don't see how you pick him.
DSJ is one of the more conflicting prospects in a while. Clearly a big talent but I saw him obviously stop trying in significant games.
DSJ is one of the more conflicting prospects in a while. Clearly a big talent but I saw him obviously stop trying in significant games.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- Pachinko_
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,693
- And1: 23,985
- Joined: Jun 13, 2016
-
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
There's something about Fultz that gives me pause and I can't exactly put my finger on it. That workout for the Sixers was pretty poor but that's not it. Just not convinced he will be the best player on this draft... I'd definitely pick Lonzo over him, and maybe even DSJ. Same for Fox, I'm not that high on him either.
All great prospects though. I'm just splitting hairs right now.
All great prospects though. I'm just splitting hairs right now.
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,160
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jul 24, 2004
- Location: New Berlin, WI (Milwaukee)
- Contact:
-
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
I would like us to trade up for Ntilikina. If not, I'm partial to Bam at 17.
But I expect us to take Giles (because Schwartz)
But I expect us to take Giles (because Schwartz)
97-98
Nick Van Exel (LAL) on defending the Stockton-Malone pick-and-roll: "Yeah,
I got a way to defend it. Bring a bat to the game and kill one of them."
Nick Van Exel (LAL) on defending the Stockton-Malone pick-and-roll: "Yeah,
I got a way to defend it. Bring a bat to the game and kill one of them."
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- Baddy Chuck
- RealGM
- Posts: 51,277
- And1: 25,430
- Joined: Apr 18, 2006
-
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
I'm really just not seeing how you fall in love with Bam.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,160
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jul 24, 2004
- Location: New Berlin, WI (Milwaukee)
- Contact:
-
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
Baddy Chuck wrote:I'm really just not seeing how you fall in love with Bam.
I'm not. Just partial to him. Full disclosure, I must defer to others evaluations of this draft's prospects. I just haven't spent enough time watching any of these guys or reading up on them.
The most time I've spent has been on Ntilikina, because he intrigued me. I usually spend 10-14 days prior to the draft cramming for the draft, but this year that span was occupied too much with our debacle of a GM search process
97-98
Nick Van Exel (LAL) on defending the Stockton-Malone pick-and-roll: "Yeah,
I got a way to defend it. Bring a bat to the game and kill one of them."
Nick Van Exel (LAL) on defending the Stockton-Malone pick-and-roll: "Yeah,
I got a way to defend it. Bring a bat to the game and kill one of them."
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
- Garbs_7
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,579
- And1: 1,635
- Joined: Jan 03, 2005
- Location: Perth, Australia
-
Re: 2017 NBA DRAFT Part 3
Ntilikina currently mocked to go 15, man if he goes one or two picks before us i'll be so sad...