skones wrote:And when "playoff mode" was activated, they went 9-16 and 8-13 with Lebron in the lineup. The Lakers were 2 games over .500 when Lebron returned at 27-25. The Clippers who finished in the 8th seed were 28-24. The Lakers were WELL within the playoff picture.
There's this narrative that Lebron's injury completely derailed that Lakers campaign and it's untrue. It was Lebron's pouting, trying to get his entire team traded in a very public way, and the impact that had on his overall ability to lead that team that was a far larger issue.
Isn't it rather curious that the downfall of the 2019 Lakers coincided exactly when LeBron got injured? Are you suggesting that LeBron was a great leader up until the moment he got injured?
When LeBron returned, the Lakers had fallen to 2 games behind the 8 seed. LeBron rushed back too soon and played injured the rest of the season. He missed 10 more games after his return. There were reports at the time suggesting he was playing at less than 100% such
as this.
The Lakers are privately a little concerned about LeBron, Is he fully healed from the groin strain that cost him a career-worst 18 games? Is he going to pick up his intensity and propel this team back into the playoffs, as he did last year in Cleveland? James, 34, is actually averaging a triple double for the Lakers since his return from injury (23.2 points, 10.8 rebounds, 11.0 assists), but he’s just not moving at the same speed nor is he engaging at the point of attack. That fourth-quarter moment in a loss to the Hawks on Wednesday in which Trae Young switched onto LeBron, and instead of taking the much smaller Young off the dribble LeBron casually threw the ball to Brandon Ingram in the corner? There are several examples like this.