Dick Tate wrote:The will he want out/will he be traded angle is actually a great strategy for the off season. Giannis plays it well.
It only works if we’re parting with the 2031 or 2032. I don’t want to do that.
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
Dick Tate wrote:The will he want out/will he be traded angle is actually a great strategy for the off season. Giannis plays it well.
paulpressey25 wrote:Dick Tate wrote:The will he want out/will he be traded angle is actually a great strategy for the off season. Giannis plays it well.
It only works if we’re parting with the 2031 or 2032. I don’t want to do that.
aboveAverage wrote:humanrefutation wrote:Assuming Giannis cannot extend until 2026, I'm not sure we can risk waiting. He is under contract for two more years, and October 2026 puts him in the final year of his deal. You don't want to go into next summer with him on a one year deal, especially after a lost season. Our potential return will be significantly less.
The Bucks don't look set up for success next year. With Doc still in tow, there is no new, fresh, brilliant head coach coming in who can turn our fortunes around. We don't have many exciting tradeable assets. We have our 2031 and 2032 picks, but the potential return for either pick is questionable, and I'm terrified at the thought of moving them with Giannis potentially wanting out.
We can keep Giannis and hope for the best. He's shown himself to be loyal to this franchise and city. And hell, maybe next offseason we make enough radical changes to the roster that Giannis decides to extend. But it's a major risk.
I’d take the risk. If we have to trade Giannis later on and get less value, so be it. I’m riding out the Giannis prime years as long as possible and try to improve the team enough around the edges. I still think it’s our best move.
Maybe we get lucky with other teams having injuries in the playoffs or them having to ship out good players because of the second apron. Maybe Horst hits on a few underrated pickups. Maybe some internal player improvement works out better than expected. If we hire a good coach next season, our chances of contention get even better. Point being, with a generational superstar, it doesn’t take much to get back to title contention.
paulpressey25 wrote:Dick Tate wrote:The will he want out/will he be traded angle is actually a great strategy for the off season. Giannis plays it well.
It only works if we’re parting with the 2031 or 2032. I don’t want to do that.
Ron Swanson wrote:jschligs wrote:When is Giannis eligible to sign an extension? I obviously don't expect him to rush it, and I bet he'll wait until the cards fall into place this season to decide his future.
October 1st, 2026 according to Spotrac. Which is why all the "they need to get out in front of this" media talk is hilarious. You have two full off-seasons to re-tool and convince Giannis to re-sign unless he forces your hand.
Yes.emunney wrote:paulpressey25 wrote:Dick Tate wrote:The will he want out/will he be traded angle is actually a great strategy for the off season. Giannis plays it well.
It only works if we’re parting with the 2031 or 2032. I don’t want to do that.
Would you do it for Markkanen?
emunney wrote:paulpressey25 wrote:Dick Tate wrote:The will he want out/will he be traded angle is actually a great strategy for the off season. Giannis plays it well.
It only works if we’re parting with the 2031 or 2032. I don’t want to do that.
Would you do it for Markkanen?
emunney wrote:Ron Swanson wrote:jschligs wrote:When is Giannis eligible to sign an extension? I obviously don't expect him to rush it, and I bet he'll wait until the cards fall into place this season to decide his future.
October 1st, 2026 according to Spotrac. Which is why all the "they need to get out in front of this" media talk is hilarious. You have two full off-seasons to re-tool and convince Giannis to re-sign unless he forces your hand.
I'm pretty sure it's 2 years after he signed his last extension, which would make it 10/23/25.
VooDoo7 wrote:These national media big mouths crack me up. Windy saying Golden State may even be willing to add Podz in a package for Giannis. Ya think?? Wow, lucky us! Holy **** I'm not sure some of these idiots truly know how good Giannis is. It's like they pay NO attention to the Milwaukee Bucks. It's like I'm in the twilight zone or something.
BTW, far as I know Giannis hasn't said ANYTHING to the team about possibly wanting to leave.
DavidDunn21 wrote:So please allow me to continue to be the scapegoat for our very rational fears, but just remember that I understand and forgive all of you.
mke_design wrote:VooDoo7 wrote:These national media big mouths crack me up. Windy saying Golden State may even be willing to add Podz in a package for Giannis. Ya think?? Wow, lucky us! Holy **** I'm not sure some of these idiots truly know how good Giannis is. It's like they pay NO attention to the Milwaukee Bucks. It's like I'm in the twilight zone or something.
BTW, far as I know Giannis hasn't said ANYTHING to the team about possibly wanting to leave.
This seems obvious but everyone taking the bait might be more obvious
VooDoo7 wrote:These national media big mouths crack me up. Windy saying Golden State may even be willing to add Podz in a package for Giannis. Ya think?? Wow, lucky us! Holy **** I'm not sure some of these idiots truly know how good Giannis is. It's like they pay NO attention to the Milwaukee Bucks. It's like I'm in the twilight zone or something.
BTW, far as I know Giannis hasn't said ANYTHING to the team about possibly wanting to leave.
Ron Swanson wrote:That Spurs package is probably still the best if Giannis asks out (#2, #14, Castle, Atlanta picks) but I'm kinda out on Devin Vassell as any sort of potential building block type player. He low-key kinda sucks. Keldon Johnson/Barnes as salary filler with a few more additional firsts/swaps is much more preferable IMO.
humanrefutation wrote:aboveAverage wrote:humanrefutation wrote:Assuming Giannis cannot extend until 2026, I'm not sure we can risk waiting. He is under contract for two more years, and October 2026 puts him in the final year of his deal. You don't want to go into next summer with him on a one year deal, especially after a lost season. Our potential return will be significantly less.
The Bucks don't look set up for success next year. With Doc still in tow, there is no new, fresh, brilliant head coach coming in who can turn our fortunes around. We don't have many exciting tradeable assets. We have our 2031 and 2032 picks, but the potential return for either pick is questionable, and I'm terrified at the thought of moving them with Giannis potentially wanting out.
We can keep Giannis and hope for the best. He's shown himself to be loyal to this franchise and city. And hell, maybe next offseason we make enough radical changes to the roster that Giannis decides to extend. But it's a major risk.
I’d take the risk. If we have to trade Giannis later on and get less value, so be it. I’m riding out the Giannis prime years as long as possible and try to improve the team enough around the edges. I still think it’s our best move.
Maybe we get lucky with other teams having injuries in the playoffs or them having to ship out good players because of the second apron. Maybe Horst hits on a few underrated pickups. Maybe some internal player improvement works out better than expected. If we hire a good coach next season, our chances of contention get even better. Point being, with a generational superstar, it doesn’t take much to get back to title contention.
True, but we had that generational superstar on the roster this year. He was healthy for the playoffs. And we got sent home in a first round exit.
To be clear, I'm not blaming Giannis for that. But apparently, we're planning to roll on with Horst and Doc, the same dudes who led us to the point we currently are in, but now with Dame injured. If we had a new FO or HC coming through, I'd be more optimistic. But we don't. What makes you think that they'll turn it around? Horst will need nail this offseason and Doc will have to be, well, something he hasn't been (a good coach). Do you believe that can happen?
machu46 wrote:paulpressey25 wrote:machu46 wrote:
Mannix was basically saying that the report that Giannis is open to playing for other teams now was Giannis' nice way of saying he wants out, and if Milwaukee holds onto him for another year, he won't be as nice about it next offseason. And he said Giannis has made it clear to anyone that will listen that he doesn't want to be like Dirk, wasting his remaining years on a team with no chance to win. I stopped listening shortly thereafter lol.
Related to Mannix where he was right was talking about victory totals. Team won 48 games with Dame playing 58 games. Do the Bucks now work the heck out of Giannis to get to 41 wins? Doesn’t Giannis then want out next year with a 41 win team.
I’m not a big believer that Dame is/was the answer at PG. That said, his volume stats help you get regular season wins and give Giannis a night off.
I get that, but he was also saying the best player we can get this offseason is someone like Cam Payne. I have to imagine we can do much better than that with the NTMLE at our disposal. I mean, KPJ alone would be a much more preferable option than Payne IMO and I don't even really like KPJ lol.
I also thought his comment that OKC would probably be more willing to trade for Giannis if he was on a $20 million per year kind of contract was just ridiculous. I get that it becomes tougher to retain depth once you have Giannis and Shai both on max deals, but (1) it's still doable and (2) you'd also have two of the top 3 players in the NBA.
trwi7 wrote:**** me deep, Giannis. ****. Me. Deep.
tedbrogen wrote:Ron Swanson wrote:That Spurs package is probably still the best if Giannis asks out (#2, #14, Castle, Atlanta picks) but I'm kinda out on Devin Vassell as any sort of potential building block type player. He low-key kinda sucks. Keldon Johnson/Barnes as salary filler with a few more additional firsts/swaps is much more preferable IMO.
This and it’s better for both sides if Vassell stays with them and the Bucks get more picks.
VooDoo7 wrote:mke_design wrote:VooDoo7 wrote:These national media big mouths crack me up. Windy saying Golden State may even be willing to add Podz in a package for Giannis. Ya think?? Wow, lucky us! Holy **** I'm not sure some of these idiots truly know how good Giannis is. It's like they pay NO attention to the Milwaukee Bucks. It's like I'm in the twilight zone or something.
BTW, far as I know Giannis hasn't said ANYTHING to the team about possibly wanting to leave.
This seems obvious but everyone taking the bait might be more obvious
Just once I'd like to see Giannis come out and drop the mic by saying "I have never once even entertained the idea of playing anywhere else...these people have no clue what they're talking about". I'd love to see the reactions from all these morons.
trwi7 wrote:**** me deep, Giannis. ****. Me. Deep.
emunney wrote:paulpressey25 wrote:Dick Tate wrote:The will he want out/will he be traded angle is actually a great strategy for the off season. Giannis plays it well.
It only works if we’re parting with the 2031 or 2032. I don’t want to do that.
Would you do it for Markkanen?
trwi7 wrote:**** me deep, Giannis. ****. Me. Deep.
emunney wrote:paulpressey25 wrote:Dick Tate wrote:The will he want out/will he be traded angle is actually a great strategy for the off season. Giannis plays it well.
It only works if we’re parting with the 2031 or 2032. I don’t want to do that.
Would you do it for Markkanen?