glenn wrote:
Lesson learned. (I did get some better cards, but nothing approaching Giannis.)
I see 2K still has horrible player models.
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
glenn wrote:
Lesson learned. (I did get some better cards, but nothing approaching Giannis.)
KidA24 wrote:I have decided to replay BOTW, and holy heck the 2nd time is so much easier when you do the "These things make the game easier" things first.
Also, I have come to accept that I am old and will absolutely never be good at combat in this game, so my only solution is craptons of +hearts food, shock arrows and swearing.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
REDDzone wrote:KidA24 wrote:I have decided to replay BOTW, and holy heck the 2nd time is so much easier when you do the "These things make the game easier" things first.
Also, I have come to accept that I am old and will absolutely never be good at combat in this game, so my only solution is craptons of +hearts food, shock arrows and swearing.
Is there a specific list or video for the "these things make the game easier" that you are referring to above?
KidA24 wrote:REDDzone wrote:KidA24 wrote:I have decided to replay BOTW, and holy heck the 2nd time is so much easier when you do the "These things make the game easier" things first.
Also, I have come to accept that I am old and will absolutely never be good at combat in this game, so my only solution is craptons of +hearts food, shock arrows and swearing.
Is there a specific list or video for the "these things make the game easier" that you are referring to above?
The two big ones for me were 1) Getting Revali's gale right away and 2) Always having a ready supply of Hearty Durians to cook up and give me lots of bonus hearts.
Stephen Jackson wrote:"I got a video off the French Montana beat that I shot in the condo. The condo was laid, man. I had a gate with a key...Yeah, Milwaukee is a nice place but the team sucked."
MikeIsGood wrote:Possibly even moreso than MS, who seems to have done good job recently in this regard, Sony gives their owned studios basically full autonomy to continue to operate how they did before, and even (or finally?) let them move into PC releases, too. With how big of a install Bungie already has on Xbox, I'm going to be interested to see if "...wherever they choose to play" continues to include Xbox...or if that means "...wherever they choose to play, as long as it isn't Xbox."
But again, in the larger landscape, I don't like the console makers gobbling up all of the independent studios - especially the AAA ones.
Sauce Boss wrote:
I just find it humorous that they were part of MS, broke off for independence, now are owned by Sony.
Ryan5UW wrote:MikeIsGood wrote:Possibly even moreso than MS, who seems to have done good job recently in this regard, Sony gives their owned studios basically full autonomy to continue to operate how they did before, and even (or finally?) let them move into PC releases, too. With how big of a install Bungie already has on Xbox, I'm going to be interested to see if "...wherever they choose to play" continues to include Xbox...or if that means "...wherever they choose to play, as long as it isn't Xbox."
But again, in the larger landscape, I don't like the console makers gobbling up all of the independent studios - especially the AAA ones.
Maybe this will be Sony saying you can keep Halo on Xbox if you let us keep COD on PlayStation?
ETA: I definitely agree with you on the last part about console makers buying up studios.
MikeIsGood wrote:Speaking of Sony studios producing games for other systems, quite timely news - The Show is coming to Nintendo Switch this year, after making its Xbox debut last year. Now, I imagine MLB could have had something to say about this given the Switch install base, but still interesting.
It'll probably be terrible like all Switch sports titles are, but hey, it's something.Ryan5UW wrote:MikeIsGood wrote:Possibly even moreso than MS, who seems to have done good job recently in this regard, Sony gives their owned studios basically full autonomy to continue to operate how they did before, and even (or finally?) let them move into PC releases, too. With how big of a install Bungie already has on Xbox, I'm going to be interested to see if "...wherever they choose to play" continues to include Xbox...or if that means "...wherever they choose to play, as long as it isn't Xbox."
But again, in the larger landscape, I don't like the console makers gobbling up all of the independent studios - especially the AAA ones.
Maybe this will be Sony saying you can keep Halo on Xbox if you let us keep COD on PlayStation?
ETA: I definitely agree with you on the last part about console makers buying up studios.
There definitely may be something nefarious here, but probably not about Halo. When Bungie went independent, they gave up the rights to Halo. Microsoft owns it and formed a new MS-owned developer.
stellation wrote:Are there any home automation boffins here?
My father has a home cinema/music setup with a bunch of different components (projector/amp/imbedded speakers in the room with the projector as well as through the house/cable tv box/blu-ray/radio/turntable/cdplayer) with components that are, I'd guess, about 15 years old. He's an avid movie and music buff, it was his big pet project/early retirement splurge and his pride and joy. There's a handful of different components involved in just turning it on to watch something/listen to something, and they all have to be done in a certain order. They all had their own remotes (I assume RFID?), but at some point he ended up with a funky thing that looked like a palm pilot and controlled them all with had some very basic automation capability (e.g. watch dvd turned on a few components). That remote has given up the ghost now.
I've not touched any home automation stuff at all, but confident I can do it (just not sure where to start/if it's worth looking at). Does anyone know if you can setup some of the modern stuff to control older devices through older technology? I'm curious if I'd be able to setup something for him that then lets him control via Alexa/whatever that allows a command to correspond to somehow firing off a handful of RFID triggers to different things.
Nightfall wrote:stellation wrote:Are there any home automation boffins here?
My father has a home cinema/music setup with a bunch of different components (projector/amp/imbedded speakers in the room with the projector as well as through the house/cable tv box/blu-ray/radio/turntable/cdplayer) with components that are, I'd guess, about 15 years old. He's an avid movie and music buff, it was his big pet project/early retirement splurge and his pride and joy. There's a handful of different components involved in just turning it on to watch something/listen to something, and they all have to be done in a certain order. They all had their own remotes (I assume RFID?), but at some point he ended up with a funky thing that looked like a palm pilot and controlled them all with had some very basic automation capability (e.g. watch dvd turned on a few components). That remote has given up the ghost now.
I've not touched any home automation stuff at all, but confident I can do it (just not sure where to start/if it's worth looking at). Does anyone know if you can setup some of the modern stuff to control older devices through older technology? I'm curious if I'd be able to setup something for him that then lets him control via Alexa/whatever that allows a command to correspond to somehow firing off a handful of RFID triggers to different things.
Maybe something like this:
https://www.amazon.com/BroadLink-Universal-Control-Temperature-Humidity/dp/B08LKWZF8X
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |