Nets grant Bucks permission to talk with Jason Kidd

jokeboy86 · Post #21 » by **jokeboy86** » Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:34 am

This looks like the new owners trying to bring more buzz and attention to the franchise because I dont like Hammond or Drew but Jason Kidd is definitely not the answer. And Kidd continues to try and throw his weight around with the Nets organization. That could get ugly. This also makes me wonder again if Embiid had been healthy and the Cavs take him would the new owners have pushed for Wiggins more than Parker.

MrPerfect1 · Post #22 » by **MrPerfect1** » Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:35 am

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

mchase27 · Post #23 » by **mchase27** » Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:37 am

You guys making it seem like the Nets front office has done a good job.

hege53190 · Post #24 » by **hege53190** » Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:37 am

New owner same terrible ideas.

Jason Kidd was one of my favorite players but he is not someone I want in charge of Milwaukee Basketball.

Big Dog Yank · Post #25 » by **Big Dog Yank** » Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:38 am

As Head Coach? Sure, why not?!

Anything more? No thanks

mchase27 · Post #26 » by **mchase27** » Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:39 am

Kidd as coach and George Karl as president of basketball operations.

Turd Ferguson · Post #27 » by **Turd Ferguson** » Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:40 am

Taking the view of the optimist and only gleaning hope from the fact that this means Drew/Hammond are likely on their way out.

emunney · Post #28 » by **emunney** » Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:41 am

WHAT ARE THEY TALKING ABOUT.

randy84 · Post #29 » by **randy84** » Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:41 am

The new owners need to stick to the blueprint of the Spurs and Thunder. Hire someone from those organizations. Keep It Simple Stupid.

Godgers · Post #30 » by **Godgers** » Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:42 am

Jason Kidd as coach puke.

Miasma · Post #31 » by **Miasma** » Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:42 am

Well we can all forget about being able to see the court if his son attends games

sorry

bizarro · Post #32 » by **bizarro** » Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:42 am

Turd Ferguson wrote:Taking the view of the optimist and only gleaning hope from the fact that this means Drew/Hammond are likely on their way out.

Interestingly, for some reason I felt perfectly fine freaking out about Johnny O'Bryant but I'm rather subdued about potentially hiring Jason Kidd.

mchase27 · Post #33 » by **mchase27** » Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:43 am

randy84 wrote:The new owners need to stick to the blueprint of the Spurs and Thunder. Hire someone from those organizations. Keep It Simple Stupid.

You just can't grab coaches from winning organizations and expect that success to follow.

MrPerfect1 · Post #34 » by **MrPerfect1** » Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:45 am

mchase27 wrote:
randy84 wrote:The new owners need to stick to the blueprint of the Spurs and Thunder. Hire someone from those organizations. Keep It Simple Stupid.

You just can't grab coaches from winning organizations and expect that success to follow.

No, but taking coaches from teams with innovative systems > coaches from teams with systems stuck in the past

emunney · Post #35 » by **emunney** » Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:45 am

I'll roll with the devil I know in Hammond and wait for a proven exec with a strong analytical lean. I hate the idea of Kidd coming in and running the show just because Lasry's friends with him. That's different from no-basketball-background guys like Ron Walter having input, but it's not different enough for me.

Buckrageous · Post #36 » by **Buckrageous** » Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:46 am

Big Dog Yank wrote:As Head Coach? Sure, why not?!

Anything more? No thanks

I dont know what the are interviewing him for but they should be hiring a head of basketball operations before they hire a coach. Doing it the other way around rarely works out.

randy84 · Post #37 » by **randy84** » Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:46 am

mchase27 wrote:
randy84 wrote:The new owners need to stick to the blueprint of the Spurs and Thunder. Hire someone from those organizations. Keep It Simple Stupid.

You just can't grab coaches from winning organizations and expect that success to follow.

You're right. Coaches from losing organizations are much better.

Aaron It Out · Post #38 » by **Aaron It Out** » Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:46 am

He turned it around big time after a god awful start. They beat a pretty good Toronto team in the playoffs. It's not like he exactly had a great team to work with. We just remember the dumb stuff we saw on ESPN. I'd be curious to see what he can do with a young up and coming team rather than a team full of corpses.

I'll see myself out now. I'll let you guys get back to your constant whining.

mchase27 · Post #39 » by **mchase27** » Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:46 am

MrPerfect1 wrote:
mchase27 wrote:
randy84 wrote:The new owners need to stick to the blueprint of the Spurs and Thunder. Hire someone from those organizations. Keep It Simple Stupid.

You just can't grab coaches from winning organizations and expect that success to follow.

No, but taking coaches from teams with innovative systems > coaches from teams with systems stuck in the past

What? Spurs system is nothing innovative. Thunder just play hero ball.

Post #40 » by **paulpressey25** » Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:47 am

This feels like a Lasry moment with Kidd, whereby Edens will take the car keys back from him shortly and talk some sense into him.