mediocrityrules wrote:Midds didn't look like he wanted to be out there tonight.
It was silly to play him in a back too back. This ain't the playoffs, and the playoffs don't have back to backs.
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
mediocrityrules wrote:Midds didn't look like he wanted to be out there tonight.
bucksfansince88 wrote:Need a dude like Avdija
Dick Tate wrote:B2B board overreaction meltdown in progress.![]()
The starters played heavy minutes last night. Who could see THIS coming?!
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
Plossum wrote:The bucks are 0-5 on the year against the Nets and Blazers who have a combined 32-62 record.
CharityStripe34 wrote:Avdija and Kamara would look amazing in Bucks jerseys.
paulpressey25 wrote:The loss isn’t on Khris, as this was a team L
But it highlights the massive decline this team has experienced due to Middleton’s injuries and drop-off. 2021-2022 regular season Khris would have played 34 minutes and put up a 26/6/6 line and the Bucks win.
You just can’t lose that type of talent and not replace it.
ShootingtheJ wrote:This team needs more Middleton's, not less.
ShootingtheJ wrote:This team needs more Middleton's, not less.
-Jragon- wrote:We have another fundamental flaw and I'm not completely sure how to exactly fix it - but I'll offer something. When Brook sets a screen, he's not rolling or cutting, he just stops there; not even a "pop" where he takes a few steps away from Dame. I think I get why.. by keeping Brook at the top, it helps him get back on D and also theoretically should take a big out of the paint for penetrators. So why isn't it working? Teams don't mind Brook shooting that 3 with a small guy in front of him, so the big still can stay in the paint.
The other problem is that there is so much upside for us if Dame takes those shots instead since he can get scorching hot at a much higher level than Brook and is 20x more dangerous when he penetrates, compared to Brook thereby teams are choosing - especially at the end of quarters - to sell out on Dame and either let Brook shoot his bricks or foul Giannis and let him brick free throws.
The fix would be that you start the quarters with Giannis and Brook drawing fouls in the paint and once teams are over the limit, then Dame will have much less contact and can get into destroy mode... with Dame in destroy mode and them over the limit, he's constantly getting 2, 3 or even 4 points per play... Giannis, at the end of quarters getting fouled more is getting 0, 1 or 2 points. Good for his little MVP pageant but bad for us trying to get a lead on a B2B on the road. Brook thinking that he has the green light everytime he's open is why i'm not against trading him anymore. We honestly need guys that are willing to pass up their own shots knowing that the greater good at the end of quarters is to let Dame close. That's the recipe.. even Giannis needs to get more on board and pass to Dame out of those long 2s at the end of quarters/halves. Dame ending quarters and halves watching Brook brick 3s and Giannis brick longs 2s/fts has to stop or we'll exit the playoffs in the 2nd round. Dame is learning when to defer to Giannis but Giannis (and Brook) doesn't know when to defer to Dame. It's like he doesn't know he's terrible at FTs. Brook's 3 pnt % isn't terrible but minute to minute, game to game there isn't much upside to him taking 10 - 15 shots. Dame can get on streaks of like 5/6 threes during a game and put us up 15+... Brook can't. Our guys just don't accept who they really are and our coaching is better this year but they don't seem to be able to get through to them. Honestly, we have some guys like Brook that should focus on everything except shooting (maybe 5 shots/game) and let Dame get 25 - 30 .. .especially when he's hot. Too easy for a fast defense to force the ball out of Dame's hands and they know he'll not get it back.
ShootingtheJ wrote:mediocrityrules wrote:Midds didn't look like he wanted to be out there tonight.
It was silly to play him in a back too back. This ain't the playoffs, and the playoffs don't have back to backs.