tedbrogen wrote:Plossum wrote:tedbrogen wrote:
Except the NBA CBA specifically allows for circumstantial evidence to be enough to prove salary cap circumvent. Smoking gun isn’t necessary.
Not sure why everyone thinks they need Joe Smith level signed agreement to see this was salary cap circumvention.
I know but it’s not as simple as Silver making a determination on the evidence put before him. There’s a lot of potential arbitration they would need to go through before it even gets to Silver making a determination (Lowe’s podcast has some useful tidbits on the process).
I get the feeling this will be drawn out and messy, whichever way it goes.
You’re missing the point. The point wasn’t Silver should make a ruling about this today. The point is that anyone saying “I need to see a smoking gun” is dumb.
You’re being way too naive. If we’re talking about potentially making someone like Ballmer sell his franchise or some other massive fine, you can bet your backside they’re gonna want some pretty strong evidence to do so. Silver can’t go hard based on the evidence currently in the public sphere. No matter how fishy it seems.
















