#12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- Turk Nowitzki
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,497
- And1: 11,521
- Joined: Feb 26, 2010
- Location: on the Hellmouth
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
I feel like Houston is going to go after Gasol with all these picks.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,778
- And1: 6,985
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
JoeHova wrote:Huh? Houston is moving up. And I didn;t say anything about Dalembert's salary from Milwaukee's perspective. I just read a few articles that said Houston was eager to dump Dalembert's salary. That doesn't mean picking it up is necessarily a bad move, it just means that the Bucks were stupid to include Leuer.
You know what I meant. I would have rather not included Leuer too, but the reality is that there are three young PF/C already on the roster better than him, and that could be five if we re-sign Ilyasova or draft another. It's not like he was ever going to start here.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- europa
- RealGM
- Posts: 44,919
- And1: 471
- Joined: Jun 25, 2005
- Location: Right Behind You
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
LUKE23 wrote:I'm wondering if we demanded 14 to stay in front of Philly for T. Jones. He's my guess at our pick right now. Either him or Ross.
If Ross is there I think he'll be the guy. Otherwise my money's on Jones.
Nothing will not break me.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 37,108
- And1: 17,267
- Joined: Jul 20, 2004
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
For the life of me, I cannot understand why anyone on this board wanted to go into the season with Sanders and Udoh at center.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- jr lucosa
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 12,048
- And1: 1,151
- Joined: Jul 11, 2008
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
RiotPunch wrote:xTitan wrote:this further entrenches the Bucks into mo man's land....

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 16,041
- And1: 189
- Joined: Jun 28, 2008
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
europa wrote:Bucksfans1and2 wrote:Really not a fan of this move. I'd rather just play Larry at Center.
That likely wasn't going to be an option (although the Bucks do seem intent on Sanders working more at C next season in a backup role). Looking at the likely scenarios this to me is far preferable than making a horrible pick for a C at 12 or going with Gooden in the starting lineup at C again.
I'm happy that we're grading our professional basketball team on a curve of incompetence.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- raferfenix
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,196
- And1: 4,514
- Joined: Apr 05, 2003
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
I wish we had any evidence whatsoever that the Bucks want to decrease Gooden's minutes.
Everything we have heard though has indicated that we see him as our 'most consistent front court player' as I think Europa once referred to him (please clarify if I got that wrong).
Skiles likes Gooden and Hammond doesn't want to admit his deal was an albatross. That is a poor combination.
Everything we have heard though has indicated that we see him as our 'most consistent front court player' as I think Europa once referred to him (please clarify if I got that wrong).
Skiles likes Gooden and Hammond doesn't want to admit his deal was an albatross. That is a poor combination.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- crkone
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,173
- And1: 9,769
- Joined: Aug 16, 2006
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
I rarely remember Skiles or Hammond talking bad about Gooden, if at all. I would think they still view him as an integral part of this team. Remember the excuse of him being injured as why we were losing?
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,135
- And1: 2,283
- Joined: Mar 03, 2006
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
Turk Nowitzki wrote:I feel like Houston is going to go after Gasol with all these picks.
I heard if that can't get Howard Josh Smith is on their radar.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- europa
- RealGM
- Posts: 44,919
- And1: 471
- Joined: Jun 25, 2005
- Location: Right Behind You
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
skones wrote:For the life of me, I cannot understand why anyone on this board wanted to go into the season with Sanders and Udoh at center.
For me, it boiled down to alternatives. I did not want to see Gooden starting and I loathed the idea of using the 12th pick on Leonard or Zeller. I was fine going with Sanders/Udoh for a season and then looking to address the position more significantly next year which now can be done since Dalembert is an expiring.
Nothing will not break me.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 42,327
- And1: 2,551
- Joined: Dec 05, 2005
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
raferfenix wrote:I wish we had any evidence whatsoever that the Bucks want to decrease Gooden's minutes.
Yeah. What this means to me is Gooden is starting at PF this year.
But I can hope that he is amnestied/traded/benched until the season starts... can't I?

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- SheedsWeed
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,931
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 30, 2004
- Location: to all the killas and the hundred dolla billas
- Contact:
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
Bucksfans1and2 wrote:Really not a fan of this move. I'd rather just play Larry at Center.
Sanders still can really. Daly played an average of 22 mpg last year, so they could still share the minutes. Plus, I don't think we will see Gooden playing C anymore seeing how as how terrible that worked out.
Our frontcourt is stacked now though. Udoh, Daly, Sanders, Moute, Gooden, Ersan (?).
Looks like Ersan might be lost, but maybe we can trade Luc for a late first?
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- buckaroo
- Senior
- Posts: 573
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 22, 2007
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
europa wrote:LUKE23 wrote:I'm wondering if we demanded 14 to stay in front of Philly for T. Jones. He's my guess at our pick right now. Either him or Ross.
If Ross is there I think he'll be the guy. Otherwise my money's on Jones.
John Canzano: The more I talk with NBA people about Terrance Ross, (G, Washington) the more I wonder about Portland nabbing him at No. 11
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- europa
- RealGM
- Posts: 44,919
- And1: 471
- Joined: Jun 25, 2005
- Location: Right Behind You
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
Bucksfans1and2 wrote:europa wrote:Bucksfans1and2 wrote:Really not a fan of this move. I'd rather just play Larry at Center.
That likely wasn't going to be an option (although the Bucks do seem intent on Sanders working more at C next season in a backup role). Looking at the likely scenarios this to me is far preferable than making a horrible pick for a C at 12 or going with Gooden in the starting lineup at C again.
I'm happy that we're grading our professional basketball team on a curve of incompetence.
Be Milwaukee.

Seriously, though, this is a good deal as we sit here today. We need to see what happens at 14 but other than losing Leuer I can't think of a single negative thing about this move.
Nothing will not break me.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- Turk Nowitzki
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,497
- And1: 11,521
- Joined: Feb 26, 2010
- Location: on the Hellmouth
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
I love how everything devolves into pure hatred for Gooden. For the love of god, get him off this team.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,135
- And1: 2,283
- Joined: Mar 03, 2006
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
europa wrote:LUKE23 wrote:I'm wondering if we demanded 14 to stay in front of Philly for T. Jones. He's my guess at our pick right now. Either him or Ross.
If Ross is there I think he'll be the guy. Otherwise my money's on Jones.
I fear you are correct...about Jones, I would love to get Ross at this point.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- JimmyTheKid
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,048
- And1: 5,441
- Joined: Feb 10, 2009
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
skones wrote:For the life of me, I cannot understand why anyone on this board wanted to go into the season with Sanders and Udoh at center.
Better than Gooden/anybody else on the roster
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- blkout
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 31,689
- And1: 1,914
- Joined: Dec 12, 2005
- Location: Melbourne
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
The team will be significantly better defensively without Gooden's useless ass not clogging up the lane. Hopefully he can't get minutes at PF if Ersan is re-signed.

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,977
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
So wait we trade for a guy in dally, while at the same time hopping that Sanders/Udoh turn out to be him(reducing their respective playing time)
Also for all those against drafting lenard or zeller, wouldn't you be more concerned about a GM who passes up two guys at the top of his board because we have a guy who's going to be gone next off season?
All in all this is pretty bad, would much rather let Sanders/Udoh play and not risk our guy getting snatched up at 12 or 13.
Also for all those against drafting lenard or zeller, wouldn't you be more concerned about a GM who passes up two guys at the top of his board because we have a guy who's going to be gone next off season?
All in all this is pretty bad, would much rather let Sanders/Udoh play and not risk our guy getting snatched up at 12 or 13.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- raferfenix
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,196
- And1: 4,514
- Joined: Apr 05, 2003
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
xTitan wrote:Turk Nowitzki wrote:I feel like Houston is going to go after Gasol with all these picks.
I heard if that can't get Howard Josh Smith is on their radar.
The Rockets had briefly acquired Gasol before David Stern got involved in the Chris Paul sweepstakes.
Lakers seem more intent than ever on trading him. Rockets might be buyers, and could have the Lakers and Hawks give competing offers, if not try to pick up both of them.