buckboy wrote:pifhluk23 wrote:All the posters who said Middleton, Parker and a 1st was too much are salty as f.
It was too much. Ainge being dumb isn't relevant to that.
Ah yeah, way too much. Salty? No, I am just happy we ended up not part of that deal.
I wouldn't have given the supposed offer of Mids/Brogdon/1st. Nope.
Boston needed a star in the worst way. They got one...though be it a little farther down the star list. But much more so than IT is.
Kind of weird for me to think about this trade as I don't think as highly about IT or Kyrie as perhaps other do. Don't like either to be honest. Not as a top dog that is for sure for sure. If either of these guys are your best player, you may not be all that good.
Boston is in a weird place where they were able to win quite a bit more than I would have thought using depth and chemistry. Now they forgo those things and go for star power in Kyrie and GH. Will be interesting to see how that works out.
Boston won the trade. Yes, they gave up a big time first rounder, but they don't "need" it. They have more coming, granted not perhaps as good. For me, I will always do a many for one trade. In Basketball talent wins. Take 2 6's and turn them into 1 8,9 or 10 level player? Done deal.
Cleveland with a pint size aging PG who is about to get paid isn't all that attractive to me. They saved their asses with this trade when Lebron leaves and IT is either way overpaid or let go, they will need that top pick. They look to be a worse team to me. Kyrie is better than IT and talent wins in the NBA. JC wont make up that difference I fear. You need a core of superstar talent to get to the finals. I don't see LJ, IT and Love getting that done. Even as great as Lebron is.
Boston will have a better team than Cleveland I am guessing for years to come.
Now...how in the hell do we catch Boston and GS? Next offseason will make or break us on that front.