#12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,779
- And1: 6,991
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
Amnestying Gooden and re-signing Ilyasova makes way too much sense for it to happen. Ross at 14, Crowder at 42.
Jennings/Udrih
Ellis/Ross
Harris/Dunleavy/Crowder
Ilyasova/Moute
Dalembert/Sanders/Udoh
That frontcourt is disgusting defensively. Backcourt is athletic. Lots of good shooters off the bench. I'd watch that team.
Jennings/Udrih
Ellis/Ross
Harris/Dunleavy/Crowder
Ilyasova/Moute
Dalembert/Sanders/Udoh
That frontcourt is disgusting defensively. Backcourt is athletic. Lots of good shooters off the bench. I'd watch that team.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- jr lucosa
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 12,048
- And1: 1,151
- Joined: Jul 11, 2008
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
xTitan wrote:europa wrote:If Ross is there I think he'll be the guy. Otherwise my money's on Jones.
I fear you are correct
Who would you like over Ross at 14 xT?
Edit: Just seen your Edit.

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- JoeHova
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,382
- And1: 61
- Joined: Feb 26, 2004
- Location: "There is hope, but not for us." -F.K.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
LUKE23 wrote: I would have rather not included Leuer too, but the reality is that there are three young PF/C already on the roster better than him, and that could be five if we re-sign Ilyasova or draft another.
When did the Bucks acquire these other guys? The only big on the roster better than Leuer was Ersan. Leuer may not be a prototypical starter but he's a valuable piece to have, unlike most of the other players on the roster. Oh well, it's not like Hammond being an idiot is a surprise at this point, it's just kind of a shame to see him undoing one of his few good moves after only a year.
"Look, if he sees me on his lawn waving a gun around, he's gonna pretend not to be home."
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- humanrefutation
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 33,051
- And1: 16,718
- Joined: Jun 05, 2006
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
LUKE23 wrote:Amnestying Gooden and re-signing Ilyasova makes way too much sense for it to happen. Ross at 14, Crowder at 42.
Jennings/Udrih
Ellis/Ross
Harris/Dunleavy/Crowder
Ilyasova/Moute
Dalembert/Sanders/Udoh
That frontcourt is disgusting defensively. Backcourt is athletic. Lots of good shooters off the bench. I'd watch that team.
Not a fan of Crowder, but I agree, this team would be fun to watch.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,829
- And1: 1,571
- Joined: Aug 06, 2005
- Location: Underground King
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
I like it for both teams. Good to have another WI boy in Leuer down here and I think Dalembert will fit into the Bucks big rotation nicely. Hopefully it squashes the desire to draft a center and we're still looking at a shooting guard.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,135
- And1: 2,283
- Joined: Mar 03, 2006
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
jr lucosa wrote:xTitan wrote:europa wrote:If Ross is there I think he'll be the guy. Otherwise my money's on Jones.
I fear you are correct
Who would you like over Ross at 14 xT?
I amended that, would love to get Ross but don't believe he is there. I don't like Terrence Jones, just a guy IMO....I hate trading down in the NBA and it might not be a big deal this year unless of course you wanted Ross or Lamb, who ever would have slipped to you at 12 and they go with the 13th pick. The klay Thompson thing still really pisses me off.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,977
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
Oh and the big news is, this KILLS any chance of D-12 going to HOU. The numbers simply don't work.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- RiotPunch
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,787
- And1: 18,146
- Joined: Jul 05, 2009
- Location: LA
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
Dally (25) / Sanders (18) / Udoh (5)
Or something like that, would be a center rotation I could definitely live with. Now, to focus on that PF rotation... I hope to God Gooden is somehow out of the equation, but I doubt it. I'd love an Ersan/Moute/Udoh platoon there. If the interest in T. Jones is legit, I bet we're looking at Gooden / Moute / Udoh / T.Jones, keeping the PF surplus going strong.
Or something like that, would be a center rotation I could definitely live with. Now, to focus on that PF rotation... I hope to God Gooden is somehow out of the equation, but I doubt it. I'd love an Ersan/Moute/Udoh platoon there. If the interest in T. Jones is legit, I bet we're looking at Gooden / Moute / Udoh / T.Jones, keeping the PF surplus going strong.
#FreeChuckDiesel
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,779
- And1: 6,991
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
JoeHova wrote:
When did the Bucks acquire these other guys? The only big on the roster better than Leuer was Ersan. Leuer may not be a prototypical starter but he's a valuable piece to have, unlike most of the other players on the roster. Oh well, it's not like Hammond being an idiot is a surprise at this point, it's just kind of a shame to see him undoing one of his few good moves after only a year.
You like Leuer as a prospect OVERALL more than Sanders, Udoh, or Moute? I disagree and disagree strongly.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,135
- And1: 2,283
- Joined: Mar 03, 2006
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
JoeHova wrote:LUKE23 wrote: I would have rather not included Leuer too, but the reality is that there are three young PF/C already on the roster better than him, and that could be five if we re-sign Ilyasova or draft another.
When did the Bucks acquire these other guys? The only big on the roster better than Leuer was Ersan. Leuer may not be a prototypical starter but he's a valuable piece to have, unlike most of the other players on the roster. Oh well, it's not like Hammond being an idiot is a surprise at this point, it's just kind of a shame to see him undoing one of his few good moves after only a year.
You just pi$$ed off the Larry Sanders fan club
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- RiotPunch
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,787
- And1: 18,146
- Joined: Jul 05, 2009
- Location: LA
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
LUKE23 wrote:Amnestying Gooden and re-signing Ilyasova makes way too much sense for it to happen. Ross at 14, Crowder at 42.
Jennings/Udrih
Ellis/Ross
Harris/Dunleavy/Crowder
Ilyasova/Moute
Dalembert/Sanders/Udoh
That frontcourt is disgusting defensively. Backcourt is athletic. Lots of good shooters off the bench. I'd watch that team.
Not to mention Ersan/Dally on the boards would be near the best in the league.
#FreeChuckDiesel
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 16,041
- And1: 189
- Joined: Jun 28, 2008
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
europa wrote:Bucksfans1and2 wrote:europa wrote:
That likely wasn't going to be an option (although the Bucks do seem intent on Sanders working more at C next season in a backup role). Looking at the likely scenarios this to me is far preferable than making a horrible pick for a C at 12 or going with Gooden in the starting lineup at C again.
I'm happy that we're grading our professional basketball team on a curve of incompetence.
Be Milwaukee.
Seriously, though, this is a good deal as we sit here today. We need to see what happens at 14 but other than losing Leuer I can't think of a single negative thing about this move.
1. We're not giving minutes to our young promising player and instead giving it to a 31 year old during a season when we're not going to break 50 wins.
2.We're now set up in a situation where we probably allow our best player to walk for nothing.
3. We're winning 40 games next year.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,779
- And1: 6,991
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
I have to seriously question anyone who says Leuer is a better prospect than Sanders.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,135
- And1: 2,283
- Joined: Mar 03, 2006
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
I think some on this board like Larry Sanders much more than the coaching staff does.....Udoh will get much more run next year then sanders will.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 16,041
- And1: 189
- Joined: Jun 28, 2008
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
JoeHova wrote:LUKE23 wrote: I would have rather not included Leuer too, but the reality is that there are three young PF/C already on the roster better than him, and that could be five if we re-sign Ilyasova or draft another.
When did the Bucks acquire these other guys? The only big on the roster better than Leuer was Ersan. Leuer may not be a prototypical starter but he's a valuable piece to have, unlike most of the other players on the roster. Oh well, it's not like Hammond being an idiot is a surprise at this point, it's just kind of a shame to see him undoing one of his few good moves after only a year.
Sanders and Udoh are both way better than Leuer.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,007
- And1: 2,260
- Joined: Jul 25, 2005
- Location: Central Wisconsin
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
RiotPunch wrote:[![]()
Alright. Adjusted stats are real numbers, though. It shows you what he is on pace for production-wise if he were on the floor that long. You're right, he won't give you 35 mins a night, he has never done that in his career, but he can certainly give you 25-30 mins a night. That still leaves you with nearly a double-double average with 2+ blocks per game.
Still though, that stats line is ridiculously good for a center playing only 22 minutes, so I'm not sure what your argument is?
My point being I think his conditioning is the problem. The last few years he has only averaged 23 minutes a game. I just dont see him getting more minutes or even being a starter. Another thing is that his biggest drawback is that he has a very low basketball IQ. People bitch about Drew. Wait till you see this guy. People think this guy will make a big difference and I think that will not be the case.
Ride the tank
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- Frank Nova
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,372
- And1: 3,554
- Joined: Jul 04, 2008
- Location: Shootin’ dice with Larry Bird in Barcelona
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
VERY Solid move. Dalembert gives us a true anchor type center to protect the rim and teach sanders how to play center. Plus this all but guarantees we draft a wing now whoever it may be. Certainly better than Zeller, Leonard or trading up for Henson. This is a huge sigh of relief IMO. Bucks must be confident Lamb, Ross, Pj3 or Terrence Jones will still be available at 14. This is an absolute awesome deal for us. Daly can still play at a high level and is a top 12 center overall in the league IMO. Probably top 10 if u just factor in defensive wise.
I'm so excited right now. Dalembert and Ross/Lamb/Pj3/T.Jones >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Zeller/Leonard, Brockman and Leuer. Hell I could use 100 greater than symbols for that.
31 obviously isn't an ideal age for any player but he's still borderline elite on the defensive end and someone that works hard on offense and doesn't need touches to be effective.
Solid A grade move IMO
I'm so excited right now. Dalembert and Ross/Lamb/Pj3/T.Jones >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Zeller/Leonard, Brockman and Leuer. Hell I could use 100 greater than symbols for that.
31 obviously isn't an ideal age for any player but he's still borderline elite on the defensive end and someone that works hard on offense and doesn't need touches to be effective.
Solid A grade move IMO
RIP Kobe Forever. GOAT 8-24. Long Live Giannis
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- Bfinkish
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,815
- And1: 126
- Joined: Jul 02, 2010
- Location: Small-Marketville
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
pe_it72 wrote:I now want to draft Perry Jones.
If not that then trade 14 for 20 and 21
Draft Sullinger and quincy Miller
+1
God is good.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- europa
- RealGM
- Posts: 44,919
- And1: 471
- Joined: Jun 25, 2005
- Location: Right Behind You
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
Bucksfans1and2 wrote:
1. We're not giving minutes to our young promising player and instead giving it to a 31 year old during a season when we're not going to break 50 wins.
2.We're now set up in a situation where we probably allow our best player to walk for nothing.
3. We're winning 40 games next year.
Maybe but you have to realize going young and completely rebuilding is simply not going to happen as long as Kohl and Skiles are around. So what some of us want here isn't realistic. We have to project based on what is the likely intended goal. Given all that, I can't think of a single negative thing about this trade other than losing Leuer, who I do like a lot and believe can be a valuable role player in this league.
Nothing will not break me.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- RiotPunch
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,787
- And1: 18,146
- Joined: Jul 05, 2009
- Location: LA
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
xTitan wrote:I think some on this board like Larry Sanders much more than the coaching staff does.....Udoh will get much more run next year then sanders will.
I'd be okay with that too. Sanders and Udoh are pretty interchangeable in my mind.
#FreeChuckDiesel
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis