ImageImage

#12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis

User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,779
And1: 6,991
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#241 » by LUKE23 » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:24 pm

Amnestying Gooden and re-signing Ilyasova makes way too much sense for it to happen. Ross at 14, Crowder at 42.

Jennings/Udrih
Ellis/Ross
Harris/Dunleavy/Crowder
Ilyasova/Moute
Dalembert/Sanders/Udoh

That frontcourt is disgusting defensively. Backcourt is athletic. Lots of good shooters off the bench. I'd watch that team.
User avatar
jr lucosa
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,048
And1: 1,151
Joined: Jul 11, 2008
       

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#242 » by jr lucosa » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:25 pm

xTitan wrote:
europa wrote:If Ross is there I think he'll be the guy. Otherwise my money's on Jones.


I fear you are correct


Who would you like over Ross at 14 xT?

Edit: Just seen your Edit. :D
User avatar
JoeHova
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,382
And1: 61
Joined: Feb 26, 2004
Location: "There is hope, but not for us." -F.K.

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#243 » by JoeHova » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:27 pm

LUKE23 wrote: I would have rather not included Leuer too, but the reality is that there are three young PF/C already on the roster better than him, and that could be five if we re-sign Ilyasova or draft another.


When did the Bucks acquire these other guys? The only big on the roster better than Leuer was Ersan. Leuer may not be a prototypical starter but he's a valuable piece to have, unlike most of the other players on the roster. Oh well, it's not like Hammond being an idiot is a surprise at this point, it's just kind of a shame to see him undoing one of his few good moves after only a year.
"Look, if he sees me on his lawn waving a gun around, he's gonna pretend not to be home."
User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 33,051
And1: 16,718
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#244 » by humanrefutation » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:27 pm

LUKE23 wrote:Amnestying Gooden and re-signing Ilyasova makes way too much sense for it to happen. Ross at 14, Crowder at 42.

Jennings/Udrih
Ellis/Ross
Harris/Dunleavy/Crowder
Ilyasova/Moute
Dalembert/Sanders/Udoh

That frontcourt is disgusting defensively. Backcourt is athletic. Lots of good shooters off the bench. I'd watch that team.


Not a fan of Crowder, but I agree, this team would be fun to watch.
Nebula1
RealGM
Posts: 27,829
And1: 1,571
Joined: Aug 06, 2005
Location: Underground King
 

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#245 » by Nebula1 » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:27 pm

I like it for both teams. Good to have another WI boy in Leuer down here and I think Dalembert will fit into the Bucks big rotation nicely. Hopefully it squashes the desire to draft a center and we're still looking at a shooting guard.
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#246 » by xTitan » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:28 pm

jr lucosa wrote:
xTitan wrote:
europa wrote:If Ross is there I think he'll be the guy. Otherwise my money's on Jones.


I fear you are correct


Who would you like over Ross at 14 xT?


I amended that, would love to get Ross but don't believe he is there. I don't like Terrence Jones, just a guy IMO....I hate trading down in the NBA and it might not be a big deal this year unless of course you wanted Ross or Lamb, who ever would have slipped to you at 12 and they go with the 13th pick. The klay Thompson thing still really pisses me off.
WiscoKing13
RealGM
Posts: 11,977
And1: 1,441
Joined: Jan 03, 2009
     

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#247 » by WiscoKing13 » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:28 pm

Oh and the big news is, this KILLS any chance of D-12 going to HOU. The numbers simply don't work.
DanoMac wrote:
bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.


I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
User avatar
RiotPunch
RealGM
Posts: 27,787
And1: 18,146
Joined: Jul 05, 2009
Location: LA
     

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#248 » by RiotPunch » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:28 pm

Dally (25) / Sanders (18) / Udoh (5)

Or something like that, would be a center rotation I could definitely live with. Now, to focus on that PF rotation... I hope to God Gooden is somehow out of the equation, but I doubt it. I'd love an Ersan/Moute/Udoh platoon there. If the interest in T. Jones is legit, I bet we're looking at Gooden / Moute / Udoh / T.Jones, keeping the PF surplus going strong.
#FreeChuckDiesel
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,779
And1: 6,991
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#249 » by LUKE23 » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:28 pm

JoeHova wrote:
When did the Bucks acquire these other guys? The only big on the roster better than Leuer was Ersan. Leuer may not be a prototypical starter but he's a valuable piece to have, unlike most of the other players on the roster. Oh well, it's not like Hammond being an idiot is a surprise at this point, it's just kind of a shame to see him undoing one of his few good moves after only a year.


You like Leuer as a prospect OVERALL more than Sanders, Udoh, or Moute? I disagree and disagree strongly.
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#250 » by xTitan » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:29 pm

JoeHova wrote:
LUKE23 wrote: I would have rather not included Leuer too, but the reality is that there are three young PF/C already on the roster better than him, and that could be five if we re-sign Ilyasova or draft another.


When did the Bucks acquire these other guys? The only big on the roster better than Leuer was Ersan. Leuer may not be a prototypical starter but he's a valuable piece to have, unlike most of the other players on the roster. Oh well, it's not like Hammond being an idiot is a surprise at this point, it's just kind of a shame to see him undoing one of his few good moves after only a year.


You just pi$$ed off the Larry Sanders fan club
User avatar
RiotPunch
RealGM
Posts: 27,787
And1: 18,146
Joined: Jul 05, 2009
Location: LA
     

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#251 » by RiotPunch » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:29 pm

LUKE23 wrote:Amnestying Gooden and re-signing Ilyasova makes way too much sense for it to happen. Ross at 14, Crowder at 42.

Jennings/Udrih
Ellis/Ross
Harris/Dunleavy/Crowder
Ilyasova/Moute
Dalembert/Sanders/Udoh

That frontcourt is disgusting defensively. Backcourt is athletic. Lots of good shooters off the bench. I'd watch that team.


Not to mention Ersan/Dally on the boards would be near the best in the league.
#FreeChuckDiesel
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
Bucksfans1and2
Banned User
Posts: 16,041
And1: 189
Joined: Jun 28, 2008

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#252 » by Bucksfans1and2 » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:30 pm

europa wrote:
Bucksfans1and2 wrote:
europa wrote:
That likely wasn't going to be an option (although the Bucks do seem intent on Sanders working more at C next season in a backup role). Looking at the likely scenarios this to me is far preferable than making a horrible pick for a C at 12 or going with Gooden in the starting lineup at C again.


I'm happy that we're grading our professional basketball team on a curve of incompetence.


Be Milwaukee. :D

Seriously, though, this is a good deal as we sit here today. We need to see what happens at 14 but other than losing Leuer I can't think of a single negative thing about this move.


1. We're not giving minutes to our young promising player and instead giving it to a 31 year old during a season when we're not going to break 50 wins.

2.We're now set up in a situation where we probably allow our best player to walk for nothing.

3. We're winning 40 games next year.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,779
And1: 6,991
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#253 » by LUKE23 » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:30 pm

I have to seriously question anyone who says Leuer is a better prospect than Sanders.
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#254 » by xTitan » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:30 pm

I think some on this board like Larry Sanders much more than the coaching staff does.....Udoh will get much more run next year then sanders will.
Bucksfans1and2
Banned User
Posts: 16,041
And1: 189
Joined: Jun 28, 2008

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#255 » by Bucksfans1and2 » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:31 pm

JoeHova wrote:
LUKE23 wrote: I would have rather not included Leuer too, but the reality is that there are three young PF/C already on the roster better than him, and that could be five if we re-sign Ilyasova or draft another.


When did the Bucks acquire these other guys? The only big on the roster better than Leuer was Ersan. Leuer may not be a prototypical starter but he's a valuable piece to have, unlike most of the other players on the roster. Oh well, it's not like Hammond being an idiot is a surprise at this point, it's just kind of a shame to see him undoing one of his few good moves after only a year.


Sanders and Udoh are both way better than Leuer.
msiris
RealGM
Posts: 11,007
And1: 2,260
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
Location: Central Wisconsin

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#256 » by msiris » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:31 pm

RiotPunch wrote:[ :lol:

Alright. Adjusted stats are real numbers, though. It shows you what he is on pace for production-wise if he were on the floor that long. You're right, he won't give you 35 mins a night, he has never done that in his career, but he can certainly give you 25-30 mins a night. That still leaves you with nearly a double-double average with 2+ blocks per game.

Still though, that stats line is ridiculously good for a center playing only 22 minutes, so I'm not sure what your argument is?

My point being I think his conditioning is the problem. The last few years he has only averaged 23 minutes a game. I just dont see him getting more minutes or even being a starter. Another thing is that his biggest drawback is that he has a very low basketball IQ. People bitch about Drew. Wait till you see this guy. People think this guy will make a big difference and I think that will not be the case.
Ride the tank
User avatar
Frank Nova
Head Coach
Posts: 7,372
And1: 3,554
Joined: Jul 04, 2008
Location: Shootin’ dice with Larry Bird in Barcelona
       

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#257 » by Frank Nova » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:31 pm

VERY Solid move. Dalembert gives us a true anchor type center to protect the rim and teach sanders how to play center. Plus this all but guarantees we draft a wing now whoever it may be. Certainly better than Zeller, Leonard or trading up for Henson. This is a huge sigh of relief IMO. Bucks must be confident Lamb, Ross, Pj3 or Terrence Jones will still be available at 14. This is an absolute awesome deal for us. Daly can still play at a high level and is a top 12 center overall in the league IMO. Probably top 10 if u just factor in defensive wise.

I'm so excited right now. Dalembert and Ross/Lamb/Pj3/T.Jones >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Zeller/Leonard, Brockman and Leuer. Hell I could use 100 greater than symbols for that.

31 obviously isn't an ideal age for any player but he's still borderline elite on the defensive end and someone that works hard on offense and doesn't need touches to be effective.

Solid A grade move IMO
RIP Kobe Forever. GOAT 8-24. Long Live Giannis
User avatar
Bfinkish
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,815
And1: 126
Joined: Jul 02, 2010
Location: Small-Marketville

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#258 » by Bfinkish » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:32 pm

pe_it72 wrote:I now want to draft Perry Jones.

If not that then trade 14 for 20 and 21

Draft Sullinger and quincy Miller




+1
God is good.
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#259 » by europa » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:32 pm

Bucksfans1and2 wrote:
1. We're not giving minutes to our young promising player and instead giving it to a 31 year old during a season when we're not going to break 50 wins.

2.We're now set up in a situation where we probably allow our best player to walk for nothing.

3. We're winning 40 games next year.


Maybe but you have to realize going young and completely rebuilding is simply not going to happen as long as Kohl and Skiles are around. So what some of us want here isn't realistic. We have to project based on what is the likely intended goal. Given all that, I can't think of a single negative thing about this trade other than losing Leuer, who I do like a lot and believe can be a valuable role player in this league.
Nothing will not break me.
User avatar
RiotPunch
RealGM
Posts: 27,787
And1: 18,146
Joined: Jul 05, 2009
Location: LA
     

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#260 » by RiotPunch » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:32 pm

xTitan wrote:I think some on this board like Larry Sanders much more than the coaching staff does.....Udoh will get much more run next year then sanders will.


I'd be okay with that too. Sanders and Udoh are pretty interchangeable in my mind.
#FreeChuckDiesel
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis

Return to Milwaukee Bucks