ImageImage

CBS: Deal on the table: LRMAM, 1st for Redick.

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
BobbyLight
RealGM
Posts: 10,027
And1: 1,546
Joined: Jul 29, 2004
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Contact:
 

Re: CBS: Deal on the table: LRMAM, 1st for Redick. 

Post#261 » by BobbyLight » Tue Feb 19, 2013 9:54 pm

H2tObes wrote:I think Hammond is an idiot as much as anyone, but if we can get Redick for Udoh/1st, you won't see me complaining. Even if he doesn't resign chances are we only lose scrub/scrub for it. If this trade goes down and there turns out to be a player better then Redick in our range, I'll eat crow.


That's why I would rather not do this. To at least have the chance to get a piece that is interesting is better than JJ Redick, to me.
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,372
And1: 25,571
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: CBS: Deal on the table: LRMAM, 1st for Redick. 

Post#262 » by Baddy Chuck » Tue Feb 19, 2013 9:56 pm

crkone wrote:What if there was a good chance it would lead to the Bucks tanking next year as they couldn't resign Redick or Smith?

I think this is ridiculous. If we taste moderate success throughout the rest of this season I'd say the odds are extremely slim that we rebuild. I always see it as a reason to do a deal, "well maybe those guys walk and we rebuild", we'll just throw the house at Paul Millsap and Kevin Martin instead. You aren't going to see a deal by Hammond and co. and think you are tricking them into rebuilding.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
bucksbrewers3
Starter
Posts: 2,159
And1: 292
Joined: Jul 25, 2011

Re: CBS: Deal on the table: LRMAM, 1st for Redick. 

Post#263 » by bucksbrewers3 » Tue Feb 19, 2013 9:58 pm

Mihai wrote:Bucks logic. Trade best defensive player and draft pick for a....6th man

Now i read that Orlando came with the idea. Hope Hambone said a big NO


Hate to break it to ya, but Mbah a moute isn't that good of a defender. Besides let's just say he's as good as you think he is, what difference does it make when the guy he's covering still out scores him by a wide margin? His offensive game is so pathetic it over weighs his defense
sneakerdust
Banned User
Posts: 856
And1: 101
Joined: Oct 04, 2012
Location: www.indeed.com
Contact:
 

Re: CBS: Deal on the table: LRMAM, 1st for Redick. 

Post#264 » by sneakerdust » Tue Feb 19, 2013 9:59 pm

bucksbrewers3 wrote:
Mihai wrote:Bucks logic. Trade best defensive player and draft pick for a....6th man

Now i read that Orlando came with the idea. Hope Hambone said a big NO


Hate to break it to ya, but Mbah a moute isn't that good of a defender. Besides let's just say he's as good as you think he is, what difference does it make when the guy he's covering still out scores him by a wide margin? His offensive game is so pathetic it over weighs his defense


Everyone has one.
User avatar
DanoMac
RealGM
Posts: 10,070
And1: 4,197
Joined: Feb 20, 2005
     

Re: CBS: Deal on the table: LRMAM, 1st for Redick. 

Post#265 » by DanoMac » Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:00 pm

arkknight1988 wrote:
superelkman wrote:
arkknight1988 wrote:Redick was a lottery pick and is living up to his potential. He gives you 15ppg and 5 assists. I don't care if you want him or not but ur disrespecting the hard work he has put in over the years to get where he is at


Didn't know JJ Redicks mom had an account on this forum.

Nope but I bet she's sexy AF


I love milfs that talk in 3rd person
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,372
And1: 25,571
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: CBS: Deal on the table: LRMAM, 1st for Redick. 

Post#266 » by Baddy Chuck » Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:01 pm

bucksbrewers3 wrote:Hate to break it to ya, but Mbah a moute isn't that good of a defender. Besides let's just say he's as good as you think he is, what difference does it make when the guy he's covering still out scores him by a wide margin? His offensive game is so pathetic it over weighs his defense

That is only illuminated because we have 3-4 other offensive liabilities on the court at any time. But yes, Luc really is expendable, and if Redick had 2-3 years left on his deal I wouldn't even mind giving up a first, but with unrestricted free agency looming, there is no reason to give up a first.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
User avatar
DanoMac
RealGM
Posts: 10,070
And1: 4,197
Joined: Feb 20, 2005
     

Re: CBS: Deal on the table: LRMAM, 1st for Redick. 

Post#267 » by DanoMac » Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:01 pm

bucksbrewers3 wrote:
Mihai wrote:Bucks logic. Trade best defensive player and draft pick for a....6th man

Now i read that Orlando came with the idea. Hope Hambone said a big NO


Hate to break it to ya, but Mbah a moute isn't that good of a defender.


Stopped reading after that. C'mon dude. I've read a lot of **** lately that people seem to just throw around, but this takes the cake.
H2tObes
RealGM
Posts: 19,562
And1: 10,022
Joined: Oct 18, 2012

Re: CBS: Deal on the table: LRMAM, 1st for Redick. 

Post#268 » by H2tObes » Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:02 pm

BobbyLight wrote:
H2tObes wrote:I think Hammond is an idiot as much as anyone, but if we can get Redick for Udoh/1st, you won't see me complaining. Even if he doesn't resign chances are we only lose scrub/scrub for it. If this trade goes down and there turns out to be a player better then Redick in our range, I'll eat crow.


That's why I would rather not do this. To at least have the chance to get a piece that is interesting is better than JJ Redick, to me.

Yeah I get what youre saying.
H2tObes
RealGM
Posts: 19,562
And1: 10,022
Joined: Oct 18, 2012

Re: CBS: Deal on the table: LRMAM, 1st for Redick. 

Post#269 » by H2tObes » Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:02 pm

DanoMac wrote:
bucksbrewers3 wrote:
Mihai wrote:Bucks logic. Trade best defensive player and draft pick for a....6th man

Now i read that Orlando came with the idea. Hope Hambone said a big NO


Hate to break it to ya, but Mbah a moute isn't that good of a defender.


Stopped reading after that. C'mon dude. I've read a lot of **** lately that people seem to just throw around, but this takes the cake.

Probably only guy in the league who can somewhat contain Lebron on a consistent basis, isn't that good of a defender :lol:
User avatar
Wooderson
RealGM
Posts: 13,265
And1: 5,983
Joined: Mar 03, 2008

Re: CBS: Deal on the table: LRMAM, 1st for Redick. 

Post#270 » by Wooderson » Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:04 pm

jeremyd236 wrote:
BobbyLight wrote:I'd rather have a shot at hitting on a mid-1st draft pick than JJ Redick and it's not even close.


I'd rather have the pick, only because Redick is an unrestricted free agent. But what the hell do you consider "hitting" on a mid-1st round pick? Kevin Durant? Lebron James?

Redick is the type of player you hope a 15-20 pick will be. 15/5 on good efficiency. I don't even like Redick, but I don't understand statements like this.


The last few drafts have been loaded with talent in that range. The first round of the draft is loaded with talent and great players constantly fall to that range. Hammond's best attribute has actually been finding talent in the middle of the draft. Considering he's terrible at pretty much everything else, I'd much rather keep the pick.


2008:
17: Roy Hibbert
21: Ryan Anderson
(Ibaka/Nic Batum in the early 20's)

2009:
17- Jrue Holiday
18- Ty Lawson
19- Jeff Teague

2010:
15- Larry Sanders
18- Eric Beldsoe
19- Avery Bradley

2011:
15: Kawhi Leonard
16: Vučević
17: Shumpert
19: Tobes
22: Faried
User avatar
yuedar
Rookie
Posts: 1,067
And1: 59
Joined: Jul 20, 2004
   

Re: CBS: Deal on the table: LRMAM, 1st for Redick. 

Post#271 » by yuedar » Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:05 pm

I am still trying to understand why are the bucks trying to make win now moves when they have an interim head coach. I don't know of any team in the history of the league doing that...
User avatar
Run-MKE 311
Senior
Posts: 553
And1: 9
Joined: Oct 22, 2012
Location: Left coast and the midwest

Re: CBS: Deal on the table: LRMAM, 1st for Redick. 

Post#272 » by Run-MKE 311 » Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:06 pm

I hope this is a joke, a very bad one at that. What the hell has Redick done to deserve a 1st round pick?!?!
Ball so hard.
User avatar
ampd
RealGM
Posts: 21,724
And1: 5,117
Joined: Dec 06, 2010

Re: CBS: Deal on the table: LRMAM, 1st for Redick. 

Post#273 » by ampd » Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:07 pm

crkone wrote:What if there was a good chance it would lead to the Bucks tanking next year as they couldn't resign Redick or Smith?


Overpaying for Redick in the hopes that it cripples your franchise and forces you to tank is pretty pointless. You can always make tank trades. As sad as this sounds, I don't think that deal makes us any more likely to tank next season anyway. We'd just overpay some middling guys in FA (think Nick Young, Mayo, Milsap, whoever), trade back in the draft for another Jax, and go for the 8th seed again.
User avatar
DanoMac
RealGM
Posts: 10,070
And1: 4,197
Joined: Feb 20, 2005
     

Re: CBS: Deal on the table: LRMAM, 1st for Redick. 

Post#274 » by DanoMac » Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:07 pm

yuedar wrote:I am still trying to understand why are the bucks trying to make win now moves when they have an interim head coach. I don't know of any team in the history of the league doing that...


This needs to be emphasized more than anything. We have an interim **** coach. Great point.
User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 33,171
And1: 16,848
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: CBS: Deal on the table: LRMAM, 1st for Redick. 

Post#275 » by humanrefutation » Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:09 pm

That would be a pretty terrible trade, even if Redick re-signs.
User avatar
ampd
RealGM
Posts: 21,724
And1: 5,117
Joined: Dec 06, 2010

Re: CBS: Deal on the table: LRMAM, 1st for Redick. 

Post#276 » by ampd » Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:10 pm

humanrefutation wrote:That would be a pretty terrible trade, even if Redick re-signs.


It would be a terrible trade regardless of whether he re signs, since we can offer him the same contract even if we don't trade for him.
sneakerdust
Banned User
Posts: 856
And1: 101
Joined: Oct 04, 2012
Location: www.indeed.com
Contact:
 

Re: CBS: Deal on the table: LRMAM, 1st for Redick. 

Post#277 » by sneakerdust » Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:10 pm

H2tObes wrote:
DanoMac wrote:
bucksbrewers3 wrote:
Hate to break it to ya, but Mbah a moute isn't that good of a defender.


Stopped reading after that. C'mon dude. I've read a lot of **** lately that people seem to just throw around, but this takes the cake.

Probably only guy in the league who can somewhat contain Lebron on a consistent basis, isn't that good of a defender :lol:

http://www.brewhoop.com/2012/9/26/34110 ... ah-a-moute

Couldn't find the analysis where JJ redick out guns Lebron but I probably didnt look hard enough.
bucksbrewers3
Starter
Posts: 2,159
And1: 292
Joined: Jul 25, 2011

Re: CBS: Deal on the table: LRMAM, 1st for Redick. 

Post#278 » by bucksbrewers3 » Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:10 pm

DanoMac wrote:
bucksbrewers3 wrote:
Mihai wrote:Bucks logic. Trade best defensive player and draft pick for a....6th man

Now i read that Orlando came with the idea. Hope Hambone said a big NO


Hate to break it to ya, but Mbah a moute isn't that good of a defender.


Stopped reading after that. C'mon dude. I've read a lot of **** lately that people seem to just throw around, but this takes the cake.


Never said he was bad but you guys seem to think he's an all NBA defensive player. He's not. He's a good defender with zero offense. So like I said if he's still giving up way more points than he's scoring why is he so valuable to you?
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,545
And1: 1,328
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

Re: CBS: Deal on the table: LRMAM, 1st for Redick. 

Post#279 » by El Duderino » Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:10 pm

Baddy Chuck wrote:
El Duderino wrote:You're assuming a team out there would be willing to trade a decent young player or a 1st for Monta Ellis and his atrocious shooting, along with with below average defense at SG. I by no means would assume that.

I'd take a second or Marshon Brooks over 30 games of Smith and the looming fear that we give him the money he wants.


That's separate from thinking Ellis can likely be traded for a young asset or say a 1st round pick. I have real doubts about that given his ugly ugly shooting.

What i don't get is why Atlanta would want to trade Smith for Ellis? If i' running the Hawks, i'd much rather just play out the season and then let Smith walk than trade him for Monta.
bucksbrewers3
Starter
Posts: 2,159
And1: 292
Joined: Jul 25, 2011

Re: CBS: Deal on the table: LRMAM, 1st for Redick. 

Post#280 » by bucksbrewers3 » Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:12 pm

At least bowen could hit a corner three

Return to Milwaukee Bucks