Does vs. Bobcats - The Battle For #7 - 1/6/08

europa · Post #261 » by **europa** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:45 am

This is a game where Bogut should get 20 shots given how he's dominating the Bobcats inside. He has 11 through three quarters and my guess is he won't get more than 15 barring foul trouble.

This really is a stupid team.

emunney · Post #262 » by **emunney** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:45 am

Crazy play by Bell bailing out an out-of-control Mo.

trwi7 · Post #263 » by **trwi7** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:46 am

paul wrote:Damn bogut that was a sweet move in the post.

Just got into the game thread, Twirl did u have to cut down my buck getting eaten by a bobcat earlier? Was just tryin to have a little fun ha ha, i knew it was a lion.

Simmons and Bell both playing reasonably well. Huh?

Bogut playing very well.

Yes I did paul.

icat2000 · Post #264 » by **icat2000** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:46 am

Down by 4. Bucks might be in with a chance.

paul · Post #265 » by **paul** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:46 am

europa wrote:This is a game where Bogut should get 20 shots given how he's dominating the Bobcats inside. He has 11 through three quarters and my guess is he won't get more than 15 barring foul trouble.

This really is a stupid team.

Agreed he should get that many shots this game. Agreed he won't.

jimmy_n13 · Post #266 » by **jimmy_n13** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:47 am

LUKE23 wrote:That babie's eyes were like 17 inches apart.

sam cassell's kid?

good to see bogut having his once in a blue moon game.

paul · Post #267 » by **paul** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:47 am

trwi7 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Yes I did paul.

Well aren't u just a big wet blanket

LUKE23 · Post #268 » by **LUKE23** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:48 am

That is not a charge. Open your goddam eyes.

trwi7 · Post #269 » by **trwi7** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:49 am

paul wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Well aren't u just a big wet blanket

How did you know about my problem? I'll outgrow it in time.

LUKE23 · Post #270 » by **LUKE23** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:49 am

Refs fleecing us.

LUKE23 · Post #271 » by **LUKE23** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:50 am

Man, three bad calls in a row.

Simulack · Post #272 » by **Simulack** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:50 am

Possibly 3 bad calls in a row. :banghead:

paul · Post #273 » by **paul** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:50 am

We're getting screwed by the refs.

I know we aren't a better team without Redd, he's our best player. But is our offensive movement better without him?

ClassicJack · Post #274 » by **ClassicJack** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:51 am

Get BIG YI!!

trwi7 · Post #275 » by **trwi7** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:51 am

LUKE23 wrote:Refs fleecing us.

In other news the sky is blue and water is wet.

icat2000 · Post #276 » by **icat2000** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:51 am

Mo shut up. Can't afford you to get tossed.

KingCammo · Post #277 » by **KingCammo** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:52 am

Our permiter defence sure isn't better without Redd, but it's not worse either.

darbstar · Post #278 » by **darbstar** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:52 am

3 bad calls in a row

Was one of those bad calls putting bogut on the bench?

Simulack · Post #279 » by **Simulack** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:52 am

Eh nevermind, Ruffin was clearly moving too.

LUKE23 · Post #280 » by **LUKE23** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:52 am

CV was hammered as he was going out of bounds. Wow.