Bernman wrote:We have low standards in Milwaukee. Like DB stated early on in this thread, Mayo has been a net negative so far in his career. He's only had one Roland Rating that eclipsed 0 thus far in his career, and it was just barely, at +0.5, a few years ago. And we're happy we only gave him 8 million per year? I guess it's an OK deal for the Bucks, when precedents are contracts like 5/32 for Drew freaking Gooden.
A lot of people here were scared about overpaying Smith, but he only got 6 million per year, and he's a much better player than Mayo. Smith's Roland Ratings during Mayo's career: +3.7, +0.5, +1.8, +3.5, and +6.5. I'd have been thrilled with giving him 8-9 million per year in comparison. That should have landed him in Milwaukee.
I think this is another mistake by the Bucks, it's just not a Bucks' bad mistake, so I guess we're supposed be relieved about that. It's sickening being a fan of this franchise. <Cue Jim Paschke clone appearing to tell me how much of a baby I am to expect to win more than 43% of the time and have occasional hope to contend>
Yea, a day later and I'm still really confused at the number of people fine with this deal. Mayo sucks, but since we didn't give him a cap killing five year deal we should celebrate?
There are some things to like about Mayo. He can shoot and he can get his own shot and produce. But he does so many bad things on the court that it easily out-weighs the negatives thus far.
I guess if you want to hang your hat on the fact that he's only now entering his prime and maybe he refines his game now that he's got his first big contract and he's playing with a new coach...I don't know. Willing to wait and see. But it's tough to find the positives in paying a bad player $8 million a season.