Ford: Jennings #2 most likely to be moved

kid idioteque · Post #301 » by **kid idioteque** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 10:48 pm

LUKE23 wrote:
kid idioteque wrote:Chris Broussard is reporting that he talked to Jennings and Jennings is denying everything.

Stun.

whatthe_buck!? · Post #302 » by **whatthe_buck!?** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 10:49 pm

kid idioteque wrote:Chris Broussard is reporting that he talked to Jennings and Jennings is denying everything.

Is Broussard an absolutely terrible reporter who never uncovers or reports anything at all incisive or is it just me? This is clearly not true, why would be want to be a mouthpiece for a player who is obviously lying to him?

OrlChamps2030 · Post #303 » by **OrlChamps2030** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 10:49 pm

Magic fan here. If they aren't willing to part with Redick for Jennings I doubt they are willing to park with either rookie or Vuc.

I'm a bit surprised (if those reports were true) that the Magic wouldn't take a swap of Jennings for Redick straight up. Even if Jennings doesn't fit into the Magic's rebuild plans he still holds value in a 3-team deal.

sneakerdust · Post #304 » by **sneakerdust** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 10:51 pm

kid idioteque wrote:Just speculation here, but one possibility that would make a lot of sense would be an Ilyasova-for-DeMar DeRozan swap. That'd give Milwaukee the talented young swingman and allow them to move forward with a young frontcourt of DeRozan, Henson and Larry Sanders. Meanwhile, Toronto would have a player similar on the offensive end to Andrea Bargnani but also someone younger, less expensive and more committed to rebounding.

[/quote]

Are they moving the 3pt line into 15ft next year? Maybe they could rename the Moderne Compton Swag?

kid idioteque · Post #305 » by **kid idioteque** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 10:51 pm

whatthe_buck!? wrote:
kid idioteque wrote:Chris Broussard is reporting that he talked to Jennings and Jennings is denying everything.

Is Broussard an absolutely terrible reporter who never uncovers or reports anything at all incisive or is it just me? This is clearly not true, why would be want to be a mouthpiece for a player who is obviously lying to him?

No. He's pretty terrible.

http://deadspin.com/5923395/congratulat ... rds-source

whatthe_buck!? · Post #306 » by **whatthe_buck!?** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 10:52 pm

Zmill wrote:Magic fan here. If they aren't willing to part with Redick for Jennings I doubt they are willing to park with either rookie or Vuc.

I'm a bit surprised (if those reports were true) that the Magic wouldn't take a swap of Jennings for Redick straight up. Even if Jennings doesn't fit into the Magic's rebuild plans he still holds value in a 3-team deal.

Yup. This is why I have to believe the offer was BJ/filler for JJ/2013 1st. And quite honestly, if that was the offer, u guys were right to turn that down...

LUKE23 · Post #307 » by **LUKE23** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 10:52 pm

DeRozan: High volume, low efficiency, can't shoot the 3, doesn't really help a ton in other areas, overpaid. A perfect Hammond pick up.

RiotPunch · Post #308 » by **RiotPunch** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 10:56 pm

Broussard is a brainless chode.

BUCKnation · Post #309 » by **BUCKnation** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 10:56 pm

LUKE23 wrote:
Just speculation here, but one possibility that would make a lot of sense would be an Ilyasova-for-DeMar DeRozan swap. That'd give Milwaukee the talented young swingman and allow them to move forward with a young frontcourt of DeRozan, Henson and Larry Sanders. Meanwhile, Toronto would have a player similar on the offensive end to Andrea Bargnani but also someone younger, less expensive and more committed to rebounding.

Good **** Lord no.

One certain poster just splooshed.

whatthe_buck!? · Post #310 » by **whatthe_buck!?** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 10:57 pm

kid idioteque wrote:
whatthe_buck!? wrote:
kid idioteque wrote:Chris Broussard is reporting that he talked to Jennings and Jennings is denying everything.

Is Broussard an absolutely terrible reporter who never uncovers or reports anything at all incisive or is it just me? This is clearly not true, why would be want to be a mouthpiece for a player who is obviously lying to him?

No. He's pretty terrible.

http://deadspin.com/5923395/congratulat ... rds-source

Aside from misspelling Memphis (smh), that part about tweeting what Gordon "told him" which was verbatim what he stated at the end of his press release is absolutely hilarious.

bucksbrewers3 · Post #311 » by **bucksbrewers3** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 10:58 pm

DeRozen is better than anything on the bucks right now. Not saying much there though

ComeBackRay34 · Post #312 » by **ComeBackRay34** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 10:59 pm

kid idioteque wrote:From ESPN Insider:

Milwaukee's 25-year-old stretch forward Ersan Ilyasova is a name that continues to come up in trade rumors, for several reasons. On one hand, he is young, talented and shows flashes of brilliance. The problem is he's continually plagued by inconsistency and is due to earn $7.9 million in each of the next three seasons after this one.

The Bucks have some leverage here since 2012 first-rounder John Henson looks like a keeper, and may be willing to move Ilyasova for the right package. And according to Steve Kyler of HoopsWorld.com, several teams have already shown interest.

"... Ilyasova has market value; both the Raptors and the Nets have made overtures for him," Kyler writes. "However, it does not look like either is eager to pay a premium to the Bucks for their troubles. If there is a dark horse play at the deadline it might be Ilyasova, especially if Toronto and Brooklyn swing and miss on other options."

Just speculation here, but one possibility that would make a lot of sense would be an Ilyasova-for-DeMar DeRozan swap. That'd give Milwaukee the talented young swingman and allow them to move forward with a young frontcourt of DeRozan, Henson and Larry Sanders. Meanwhile, Toronto would have a player similar on the offensive end to Andrea Bargnani but also someone younger, less expensive and more committed to rebounding.

Oh dear lord. I am someone who would be just fine with trading Ersan, as I don't have the love for him that some do. But good grief, trading him for DD would be an epic fail and it scares me that the Bucks would consider it. If you trade Ersan, its either so Henson can take-over the starting spot and you move forward in a rebuild or in a package for a top tier player. Please don't touch anyone like DD. We are already trying to get rid of BJ, we don't need his sg/sf clone.

sneakerdust · Post #313 » by **sneakerdust** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 11:00 pm

LUKE23 wrote:DeRozan: High volume, low efficiency, can't shoot the 3, doesn't really help a ton in other areas, overpaid. A perfect Hammond pick up.

We definitely dont need to mess with our frontline. And you know what I actually like watching Ersan play whether hes 25/26 or 30/31 or whatever. You've got to give the fans something and I like watching him work and develop.

And to be honest one of the reasons I like Mayo is from what i can tell he's actually a relatively smart guy with a maturing demeanor. I dont get that from derozan or some others. Sick of watching that crap.

Not to mention although I like Henson's future Okafor of all people embarassed him in the post. He needs a couple off season flexibility/strength camps.

LUKE23 · Post #314 » by **LUKE23** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 11:01 pm

bucksbrewers3 wrote:DeRozen is better than anything on the bucks right now. Not saying much there though

If the only requisite is points per game and literally nothing else, then he has a case. He sucks though.

JBucks · Post #315 » by **JBucks** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 11:01 pm

DeRozan = the shooting guard version of Jennings. Watch Hammond trade Ilyasova for him as a sop to Jennings.

Baddy Chuck · Post #316 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 11:01 pm

bucksbrewers3 wrote:DeRozen is better than anything on the bucks right now. Not saying much there though

Ersan and Larry are better and by far have more impact on games. DeRozan is a less efficient Richard Jefferson in his stint here. Empty points.

RiotPunch · Post #317 » by **RiotPunch** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 11:02 pm

bucksbrewers3 wrote:DeRozen is better than anything on the bucks right now. Not saying much there though

Not saying we have nice assets, but we do have better than DeRozan on this roster right now.

bucksbrewers3 · Post #318 » by **bucksbrewers3** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 11:02 pm

LUKE23 wrote:
bucksbrewers3 wrote:DeRozen is better than anything on the bucks right now. Not saying much there though

If the only requisite is points per game and literally nothing else, then he has a case. He sucks though.

he can jump high.......... :dontknow:

whatthe_buck!? · Post #319 » by **whatthe_buck!?** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 11:03 pm

LUKE23 wrote:
Just speculation here, but one possibility that would make a lot of sense would be an Ilyasova-for-DeMar DeRozan swap. That'd give Milwaukee the talented young swingman and allow them to move forward with a young frontcourt of DeRozan, Henson and Larry Sanders. Meanwhile, Toronto would have a player similar on the offensive end to Andrea Bargnani but also someone younger, less expensive and more committed to rebounding.

Good **** Lord no.

This HAS to be total BS. Even our FO couldn't be that dumb. The only way we would do that would be if we wanted to try to give BJ a reason to stay put and be happy about staying but I think at this point the fact that bridges have been burned and that the cord has to be cut is apparent even to Hamboner.

ajb905 · Post #320 » by **ajb905** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 11:13 pm

LUKE23 wrote:
bucksbrewers3 wrote:DeRozen is better than anything on the bucks right now. Not saying much there though

If the only requisite is points per game and literally nothing else, then he has a case. He sucks though.

Yep he is all kinds of terrible. Ross has been bad as well so I dont see him as a good target. With how Tor operates maybe lowry could be available? BJ and dalembert for lowry and gray