ImageImage

Bucks talking Asik

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
BigDoggyStyle
Senior
Posts: 726
And1: 49
Joined: Jul 13, 2012

Re: Bucks talking Asik 

Post#321 » by BigDoggyStyle » Fri Dec 13, 2013 5:43 am

BuckPack wrote:Nahh


This made my night. :D
User avatar
SkilesTheLimit
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,780
And1: 1,795
Joined: Oct 23, 2010
Location: Pop Up Zone
     

Re: Bucks talking Asik 

Post#322 » by SkilesTheLimit » Fri Dec 13, 2013 5:43 am

Baddy Chuck wrote:
Wooderson wrote:I took on board to mean that he organized some sort of stealth tank by putting on a theater of moves in the offseason that could pass as win-now for Kohl.

I highly doubt that is the case. Hammond is Kohl's employee, he's going to do whatever Kohl wants. Hammond is trying to win now with what Kohl has given him, and doing an atrocious job at it. He may want to tank and Kohl may have told him no, but once that may have happened he made an honest attempt to make this team good. And he sucks at it.


The best example I can think of in defense of your argument is the late acquisition of Caron Butler. They weren't intending to light $8 million on fire to try and tank with an aging vet. They saw him as a key "win now" contributor. In their minds, they were getting Caron Butler from '07-08: a man that never aged or regressed in talent. Recall Larry Drew's comment about him not being the 3rd or 4th option on our team...

You just have to hope that looking at their 5-17 record, they have reassessed their plan and have gotten Kohl to buy in to the tank for the rest of this season.
We're going to turn this team around 360 degrees.
- Jason Kidd
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,382
And1: 29,124
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: Bucks talking Asik 

Post#323 » by paulpressey25 » Fri Dec 13, 2013 5:43 am

ReasonablySober wrote:
Sanders, Henson, Giannis and Harris? Even LRMAM? Getting good players where the Bucks did in the draft isn't insignificant.


viewtopic.php?f=21&t=1290212#p37820701

We should move this discussion to the Why isn't Hammond Fired thread.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 106,239
And1: 40,790
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Bucks talking Asik 

Post#324 » by ReasonablySober » Fri Dec 13, 2013 5:45 am

Signature moves?

Getting one of the five best defenders at 15, then signing him to a below market deal? Those aren't signature moves? What does that even mean, then?

Hammond has been a pretty **** great drafter, and for a team like the Bucks that's maybe the most important quality a GM can have.
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,420
And1: 4,401
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: Bucks talking Asik 

Post#325 » by Kerb Hohl » Fri Dec 13, 2013 5:46 am

I'll echo PP's thoughts. RS isn't far off in saying those were good picks but he pooped away his top 10 picks and I don't think any of those guys are moving the needle incredibly far save for maybe Giannis.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,382
And1: 29,124
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: Bucks talking Asik 

Post#326 » by paulpressey25 » Fri Dec 13, 2013 5:47 am

Again, let's move this discussion to the Why isn't Hammond Fired


And if people want to talk Ersan and Sanders trade thoughts, head here.

thread.viewtopic.php?f=21&t=1289697&start=165

We'll close this one down now since Batman has spoken.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25

Return to Milwaukee Bucks