Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
crkone wrote:gbmb34 wrote:I'm a believer in Ripple, but have seen a few guides about how to buy it but nothing definitive. Does anyone have any suggestions to minimize fees while also being relatively safe?
Coinbase-deposit USD->GDAX-buy ETH->binance-ETH to XRP->Transfer to wallet of your choice
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
crkone wrote:gbmb34 wrote:I'm a believer in Ripple, but have seen a few guides about how to buy it but nothing definitive. Does anyone have any suggestions to minimize fees while also being relatively safe?
Coinbase-deposit USD->GDAX-buy ETH->binance-ETH to XRP->Transfer to wallet of your choice
MickeyDavis wrote:crkone wrote:gbmb34 wrote:I'm a believer in Ripple, but have seen a few guides about how to buy it but nothing definitive. Does anyone have any suggestions to minimize fees while also being relatively safe?
Coinbase-deposit USD->GDAX-buy ETH->binance-ETH to XRP->Transfer to wallet of your choice
That's what I did but bought BTC instead of ETH. I still need a wallet to transfer from Binance but I'm going to wait until I'm done buying. A main reason for using GDAX is no fee to transfer to Binance (or whatever exchange you use)
KnicksGod wrote:Middleton probably the most underrated player in NBA History
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
MickeyDavis wrote:January 21 is the date I'm hearing for XRP to be added to Coinbase. Who the hell knows if it's accurate.
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
MickeyDavis wrote:January 21 is the date I'm hearing for XRP to be added to Coinbase. Who the hell knows if it's accurate.
M-C-G wrote:MickeyDavis wrote:January 21 is the date I'm hearing for XRP to be added to Coinbase. Who the hell knows if it's accurate.
Anybody with Coinbase that has BMO have a way of loading funds other than CC? For whatever reason, it doesn't seem to recognize BMO and if you try to wire xfer, I don't see the routing/account info to wire into.
KnicksGod wrote:Middleton probably the most underrated player in NBA History
In a seismic shift, Attorney General Jeff Sessions will announce Thursday that he is rescinding a trio of memos from the Obama administration that adopted a policy of non-interference with marijuana-friendly state laws, according to a source with knowledge of the decision.
While many states have decriminalized or legalized marijuana use, the drug is still illegal under federal law, creating a conflict between federal and state law.
The main Justice Department memo addressing the issue, known as the "Cole memo" for then-Deputy Attorney General Jim Cole in 2013, set forth new priorities for federal prosecutors operating in states where the drug had been legalized for medical or other adult use. It represented a major shift from strict enforcement to a more hands-off approach, so long as they didn't threaten other federal priorities, such as preventing the distribution of the drug to minors and cartels.
The memo will be rescinded but it's not immediately clear whether Sessions will issue new guidance in its place or simply revert back to older policies that left states with legal uncertainty about enforcement of federal law.
The decision had been closely watched since Sessions was sworn in. He told reporters in November he was examining a "rational" policy.
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
crkone wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2018/01/04/politics/jeff-sessions-cole-memo/index.html
Sessions to rescind Obama-era rules on non-interference with states where pot is legalIn a seismic shift, Attorney General Jeff Sessions will announce Thursday that he is rescinding a trio of memos from the Obama administration that adopted a policy of non-interference with marijuana-friendly state laws, according to a source with knowledge of the decision.
While many states have decriminalized or legalized marijuana use, the drug is still illegal under federal law, creating a conflict between federal and state law.
The main Justice Department memo addressing the issue, known as the "Cole memo" for then-Deputy Attorney General Jim Cole in 2013, set forth new priorities for federal prosecutors operating in states where the drug had been legalized for medical or other adult use. It represented a major shift from strict enforcement to a more hands-off approach, so long as they didn't threaten other federal priorities, such as preventing the distribution of the drug to minors and cartels.
The memo will be rescinded but it's not immediately clear whether Sessions will issue new guidance in its place or simply revert back to older policies that left states with legal uncertainty about enforcement of federal law.
The decision had been closely watched since Sessions was sworn in. He told reporters in November he was examining a "rational" policy.
Sell! Sell! Sell!
crkone wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2018/01/04/politics/jeff-sessions-cole-memo/index.html
Sessions to rescind Obama-era rules on non-interference with states where pot is legalIn a seismic shift, Attorney General Jeff Sessions will announce Thursday that he is rescinding a trio of memos from the Obama administration that adopted a policy of non-interference with marijuana-friendly state laws, according to a source with knowledge of the decision.
While many states have decriminalized or legalized marijuana use, the drug is still illegal under federal law, creating a conflict between federal and state law.
The main Justice Department memo addressing the issue, known as the "Cole memo" for then-Deputy Attorney General Jim Cole in 2013, set forth new priorities for federal prosecutors operating in states where the drug had been legalized for medical or other adult use. It represented a major shift from strict enforcement to a more hands-off approach, so long as they didn't threaten other federal priorities, such as preventing the distribution of the drug to minors and cartels.
The memo will be rescinded but it's not immediately clear whether Sessions will issue new guidance in its place or simply revert back to older policies that left states with legal uncertainty about enforcement of federal law.
The decision had been closely watched since Sessions was sworn in. He told reporters in November he was examining a "rational" policy.
Sell! Sell! Sell!
Iheartfootball wrote:crkone wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2018/01/04/politics/jeff-sessions-cole-memo/index.html
Sessions to rescind Obama-era rules on non-interference with states where pot is legalIn a seismic shift, Attorney General Jeff Sessions will announce Thursday that he is rescinding a trio of memos from the Obama administration that adopted a policy of non-interference with marijuana-friendly state laws, according to a source with knowledge of the decision.
While many states have decriminalized or legalized marijuana use, the drug is still illegal under federal law, creating a conflict between federal and state law.
The main Justice Department memo addressing the issue, known as the "Cole memo" for then-Deputy Attorney General Jim Cole in 2013, set forth new priorities for federal prosecutors operating in states where the drug had been legalized for medical or other adult use. It represented a major shift from strict enforcement to a more hands-off approach, so long as they didn't threaten other federal priorities, such as preventing the distribution of the drug to minors and cartels.
The memo will be rescinded but it's not immediately clear whether Sessions will issue new guidance in its place or simply revert back to older policies that left states with legal uncertainty about enforcement of federal law.
The decision had been closely watched since Sessions was sworn in. He told reporters in November he was examining a "rational" policy.
Sell! Sell! Sell!
*cough* *cough* this is just to deflect attention from Russia...
But seriously, the states are and have been deciding this. Prohibition on marijuana is in its twilight. The ship has sailed. If anything it might allow those of us who didn't buy early, to get in cheaper if these investments take a hit?
M-C-G wrote:Iheartfootball wrote:crkone wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2018/01/04/politics/jeff-sessions-cole-memo/index.html
Sessions to rescind Obama-era rules on non-interference with states where pot is legal
Sell! Sell! Sell!
*cough* *cough* this is just to deflect attention from Russia...
But seriously, the states are and have been deciding this. Prohibition on marijuana is in its twilight. The ship has sailed. If anything it might allow those of us who didn't buy early, to get in cheaper if these investments take a hit?
Are there some front runners in the US recreational market?
Iheartfootball wrote:M-C-G wrote:Iheartfootball wrote:
*cough* *cough* this is just to deflect attention from Russia...
But seriously, the states are and have been deciding this. Prohibition on marijuana is in its twilight. The ship has sailed. If anything it might allow those of us who didn't buy early, to get in cheaper if these investments take a hit?
Are there some front runners in the US recreational market?
You mean by state, collective, company? California is going to be the biggest producer (if it isn't already). As far as the companies/collectives that are responsible for that I have no idea. Haven't done any research so I'm not qualified. I'm not sure if that was the question you were asking though...
M-C-G wrote:Iheartfootball wrote:M-C-G wrote:
Are there some front runners in the US recreational market?
You mean by state, collective, company? California is going to be the biggest producer (if it isn't already). As far as the companies/collectives that are responsible for that I have no idea. Haven't done any research so I'm not qualified. I'm not sure if that was the question you were asking though...
Yeah, I was more asking, are there a couple of "key players" that would be positioned to be the big players in the market nationwide once the law allows.