skones wrote:MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:skones wrote:
First things first, you HAVE to carry 14 players on a roster. Georgios made 14. You cannot leave that roster spot open. He was the cheapest possible player to fill that 14th spot based on salary scale. Yes, UDFA are more expensive. So I believe that covers your first two paragraphs.
That would make sense.....if Georgios was on our roster. He isn't. They paid $800k to have him come here for 2 months. THEN they signed a FA. If they were being cheap they would've 1. Drafted someone better and 2. Kept them the whole year. If it was about money, he would still be here, right? (ETA: and then they also would not have traded for Allen)
IDK why they drafted him but purposely drafting someone who as you said was on no ones radar, pay 1/3 million to get him out of a contract and then cut him only to sign a FA to fill the 14th spot does not make any sense to me? Is it fishy and stupid? Probably. But I don't get how the Georgios experience saved us money?
No. It STILL makes sense. You have to carry 14 players on a roster. You don't think their hand was forced by injury and Covid to look for solutions? Read the tea leaves. Even IF the plan was to eventually move on from Georgios from the start, they are STILL being cheap because pro-ration is a thing. They didn't "pay 800k" to have him come here for two months. His salary was 440k for the year AND he was only partially guaranteed.
If you pay 25% of the cheapest possible deal and then pay 75% of a league minimum, that is cheaper than paying 100% of a league minimum. This is basic math here man.
Math doesnt explain why they drafted Georgios. They could've drafted someone else.
Ok so basic math is an UDFA is $1m. Georgios would have been $440k. Add in they paid $300k to the club, the net is ~$200k. Or the difference between Wes signing at the beginning of the season versus now is what... 25% of $2.5. So $600k (less the cost of Georgios buyout so net $300k). IDK They are cheap but dont think this is it? They brought in Teague for $.5m last year.
ETA:
NONE of this changes the fact that the Bucks legitimately tried to get away with having the smallest salary slot possible on their roster for the 21-22 campaign. Again, that's not speculation. It happened no matter how much you try to skirt around that fact. Let me be plain, again, for the third time. ONE IS NOT PURE SPECULATION, THE OTHER IS. THAT IS THE POINT.
So you know for a fact the only reason they drafted Georgios is because it was as cheap as possible? Its definitely possible but I think there were other reasons he was drafted.
Actual question while looking at the roster: It looks like Kornet and Galloway both cost $100k. Were we required to bring them both in? Is there any cap/tax relief on these signings?