ImageImage

Trade Targets (postcript on yesterday-other teams)

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,527
And1: 9,854
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3781 » by M-C-G » Mon Feb 9, 2015 9:46 pm

Giannis Parker wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:
Giannis Parker wrote:
Knight/Middleton/Parker/Giannis/??????

Knight does nothing to diminish those around him from being scorers. Look at the #'s since Middleton has been a starter, they do not lie.

lol. Parker/Giannis/Middleton are going to be a 70+ USG trio. We need a role playing distributor with them not a head down gunner. One ball.


Knight has not been this player you speak of for almost a month now, do you really ever watch the games man......your bias is strong!

We need a Center to become a legit threat for the next 5-6 seasons. For the first time ever we are set at 4 of 5 positions, and yet people like you cannot be happy, makes me sick man, makes me sick :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:


Actually, interesting point...Since Middleton entered the starting line up, what have we seen with people's +/- and shooting percentages with Knight in the line up?

I know Knight was knocked for making everyone worse, but now with Middleton's spacing has that tide turned a bit?
GHOSTofSIKMA
RealGM
Posts: 22,807
And1: 8,976
Joined: Jan 21, 2007
Location: NC
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3782 » by GHOSTofSIKMA » Mon Feb 9, 2015 9:48 pm

weve been playing really good basketball with a knight at pg, a 23 yo sg, a 20 yo sf, a 24 yo c, and a middling ant sized pf. the argument that we cant be successful with knight as a fulltime pg for some reason or another is lost on me.
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
Posts: 42,374
And1: 20,900
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: Bucks in 7?
 

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3783 » by AussieBuck » Mon Feb 9, 2015 9:51 pm

Giannis Parker wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:
Giannis Parker wrote:
Knight/Middleton/Parker/Giannis/??????

Knight does nothing to diminish those around him from being scorers. Look at the #'s since Middleton has been a starter, they do not lie.

lol. Parker/Giannis/Middleton are going to be a 70+ USG trio. We need a role playing distributor with them not a head down gunner. One ball.


Knight has not been this player you speak of for almost a month now, do you really ever watch the games man......your bias is strong!

We need a Center to become a legit threat for the next 5-6 seasons. For the first time ever we are set at 4 of 5 positions, and yet people like you cannot be happy, makes me sick man, makes me sick :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:

Knight still drives with his head down like he's Michael Redd, Still only one ball too. You're either playing Knight big money to score 14 points a game or have him taking touches away from better players.
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.


GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
User avatar
blazza18
RealGM
Posts: 56,919
And1: 29,700
Joined: Dec 02, 2010
Location: Upside Down
       

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3784 » by blazza18 » Mon Feb 9, 2015 9:53 pm

ampd wrote:Even Stephen curry had all sorts of problems at pg earlier in his career. It's a big part of why they were able to extend him at the contract they did rather than at the max.


His ankles were the big reason why he got an undervalued contract.
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,645
And1: 42,756
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3785 » by ReasonablySober » Mon Feb 9, 2015 9:53 pm

Giannis Parker wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:
Giannis Parker wrote:
Knight/Middleton/Parker/Giannis/??????

Knight does nothing to diminish those around him from being scorers. Look at the #'s since Middleton has been a starter, they do not lie.

lol. Parker/Giannis/Middleton are going to be a 70+ USG trio. We need a role playing distributor with them not a head down gunner. One ball.


Knight has not been this player you speak of for almost a month now, do you really ever watch the games man......your bias is strong!

We need a Center to become a legit threat for the next 5-6 seasons. For the first time ever we are set at 4 of 5 positions, and yet people like you cannot be happy, makes me sick man, makes me sick :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:


He's had a USG of 27% for the last month. That's actually higher than his number on the season is. Are you forgetting that next season the Bucks are going to be adding Jabari Parker to the mix?

Either you believe Parker and/or Giannis will continue to play 2nd and 3rd fiddle to Knight (and that's what I believe happens if Knight is brought back) or you think Knight accepts the role of Mario Chalmers (I don't).
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,645
And1: 42,756
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3786 » by ReasonablySober » Mon Feb 9, 2015 9:53 pm

Giannis Parker wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:
Giannis Parker wrote:
Knight/Middleton/Parker/Giannis/??????

Knight does nothing to diminish those around him from being scorers. Look at the #'s since Middleton has been a starter, they do not lie.

lol. Parker/Giannis/Middleton are going to be a 70+ USG trio. We need a role playing distributor with them not a head down gunner. One ball.


Knight has not been this player you speak of for almost a month now, do you really ever watch the games man......your bias is strong!

We need a Center to become a legit threat for the next 5-6 seasons. For the first time ever we are set at 4 of 5 positions, and yet people like you cannot be happy, makes me sick man, makes me sick :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:


He's had a USG of 27% for the last month. That's actually higher than his number on the season is. Are you forgetting that next season the Bucks are going to be adding Jabari Parker to the mix?

Either you believe Parker and/or Giannis will continue to play 2nd and 3rd fiddle to Knight (and that's what I believe happens if Knight is brought back) or you think Knight accepts the role of Mario Chalmers (I don't).
User avatar
blazza18
RealGM
Posts: 56,919
And1: 29,700
Joined: Dec 02, 2010
Location: Upside Down
       

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3787 » by blazza18 » Mon Feb 9, 2015 9:53 pm

ampd wrote:Even Stephen curry had all sorts of problems at pg earlier in his career. It's a big part of why they were able to extend him at the contract they did rather than at the max.


His ankles were the big reason why he got an undervalued contract.
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
Posts: 42,374
And1: 20,900
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: Bucks in 7?
 

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3788 » by AussieBuck » Mon Feb 9, 2015 10:10 pm

Knight is killing the internet, I'm done talking about Lou Williams 2.0 :)
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.


GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
User avatar
ampd
RealGM
Posts: 21,765
And1: 5,153
Joined: Dec 06, 2010

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3789 » by ampd » Mon Feb 9, 2015 10:16 pm

blazza18 wrote:
ampd wrote:Even Stephen curry had all sorts of problems at pg earlier in his career. It's a big part of why they were able to extend him at the contract they did rather than at the max.


His ankles were the big reason why he got an undervalued contract.


He is also a vastly better playmaker now than he was his first few years in the league.
User avatar
blazza18
RealGM
Posts: 56,919
And1: 29,700
Joined: Dec 02, 2010
Location: Upside Down
       

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3790 » by blazza18 » Mon Feb 9, 2015 10:28 pm

I think Curry's always been a vastly underrated playmaker because of his shooting. He's obviously gotten even better, but he was still pretty damn good. Much better than what Knight has ever been.
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 9,055
And1: 5,089
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3791 » by RRyder823 » Mon Feb 9, 2015 10:55 pm

ReasonablySober wrote:
Giannis Parker wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:lol. Parker/Giannis/Middleton are going to be a 70+ USG trio. We need a role playing distributor with them not a head down gunner. One ball.


Knight has not been this player you speak of for almost a month now, do you really ever watch the games man......your bias is strong!

We need a Center to become a legit threat for the next 5-6 seasons. For the first time ever we are set at 4 of 5 positions, and yet people like you cannot be happy, makes me sick man, makes me sick :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:


He's had a USG of 27% for the last month. That's actually higher than his number on the season is. Are you forgetting that next season the Bucks are going to be adding Jabari Parker to the mix?

Either you believe Parker and/or Giannis will continue to play 2nd and 3rd fiddle to Knight (and that's what I believe happens if Knight is brought back) or you think Knight accepts the role of Mario Chalmers (I don't).


Well said on the main divide on this issue. I think he would accept the Chalmers role so I have no problem bringing him back. We simply disagree on this point. That said im more then open to trading him for the right price. But i'll say the same regarding anyone not named Jabari or Giannis
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,841
And1: 30,106
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3792 » by paulpressey25 » Mon Feb 9, 2015 11:03 pm

I just looked at our schedule.

http://espn.go.com/nba/team/schedule/_/ ... ukee-bucks

We play tonight and the Kings on Wednesday. Then we are off for 9 straight days. Our next game isn't until after the Feb 19th trade deadline. So all the evals of guys for trade purposes will be done by Wednesday night.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
User avatar
GOBsaysCOMEON
Junior
Posts: 285
And1: 157
Joined: Jul 13, 2009
       

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3793 » by GOBsaysCOMEON » Mon Feb 9, 2015 11:24 pm

As the deadline approaches, I hope the Bucks try to take advantage of a stupid team like Sacramento.
Once, when asked if he was concerned about his former coach Nate McMillan commenting that he has a selfish attitude, Jerome James replied, "I don't even know what he's talking about, I just worry about Jerome."
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
Posts: 42,374
And1: 20,900
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: Bucks in 7?
 

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3794 » by AussieBuck » Mon Feb 9, 2015 11:26 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:I just looked at our schedule.

http://espn.go.com/nba/team/schedule/_/ ... ukee-bucks

We play tonight and the Kings on Wednesday. Then we are off for 9 straight days. Our next game isn't until after the Feb 19th trade deadline. So all the evals of guys for trade purposes will be done by Wednesday night.

Anyone ever been traded between the All Star game and the deadline? :D
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.


GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
dc634
Senior
Posts: 678
And1: 150
Joined: Feb 21, 2014
   

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3795 » by dc634 » Mon Feb 9, 2015 11:40 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:I just looked at our schedule.

http://espn.go.com/nba/team/schedule/_/ ... ukee-bucks

We play tonight and the Kings on Wednesday. Then we are off for 9 straight days. Our next game isn't until after the Feb 19th trade deadline. So all the evals of guys for trade purposes will be done by Wednesday night.



Well that is a long ass time.
mattg
General Manager
Posts: 8,022
And1: 3,508
Joined: Feb 12, 2007

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3796 » by mattg » Mon Feb 9, 2015 11:47 pm

It needs to be mentioned that usage% is a dumb stat that doesn't accurately reflect how much a player actually has the ball. It's theoretically possible for a player to dribble 23 seconds out of every shot clock for an entire game and still have a usage of zero.
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
Posts: 42,374
And1: 20,900
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: Bucks in 7?
 

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3797 » by AussieBuck » Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:05 am

mattg wrote:It needs to be mentioned that usage% is a dumb stat that doesn't accurately reflect how much a player actually has the ball. It's theoretically possible for a player to dribble 23 seconds out of every shot clock for an entire game and still have a usage of zero.

Does it really need mentioning? Did anyone not know it isn't clock usage and or use to that way?
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.


GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
dc634
Senior
Posts: 678
And1: 150
Joined: Feb 21, 2014
   

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3798 » by dc634 » Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:13 am

AussieBuck wrote:
mattg wrote:It needs to be mentioned that usage% is a dumb stat that doesn't accurately reflect how much a player actually has the ball. It's theoretically possible for a player to dribble 23 seconds out of every shot clock for an entire game and still have a usage of zero.

Does it really need mentioning? Did anyone not know it isn't clock usage and or use to that way?


Probably a lot of people, actually.
Giannis Parker
Banned User
Posts: 925
And1: 169
Joined: Oct 22, 2014

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3799 » by Giannis Parker » Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:38 am

dc634 wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:
mattg wrote:It needs to be mentioned that usage% is a dumb stat that doesn't accurately reflect how much a player actually has the ball. It's theoretically possible for a player to dribble 23 seconds out of every shot clock for an entire game and still have a usage of zero.

Does it really need mentioning? Did anyone not know it isn't clock usage and or use to that way?


Probably a lot of people, actually.


The facts are that we are not in any type of salary hole, the facts are that Knight is absolutely a 3rd fiddle for any good team, the fact is that Knight is worth 12-14m per season (but may get only 10-11m based on market), the fact is that with Knight/Middleton/Parker/Giannis this team now looks better than they have for 25 years. Those are the facts, which also means that the last and final fact is that we have one position of weakness, that being the Center spot.

I feel that having 4 players who can legitimately score the basketball at an efficient rate is going to be a huge asset for this team moving forward, and we should be looking to fill the Center position with someone like a Ben Wallace type player, while having Henson off the bench who can give you more of a scoring presence. Finding a Center who can fulfill this role is easier to me then trying to find a PG who can give you 17 and 7 along with efficiency.

You can very easily make a case for 27/27/23/18 for Giannis/Jabari/Knight/Middleton. And fwiw, a usage of 18 for a player who is primarily a jump shooter is quite high. Expecting Middleton to be a 27% usage player seems quite a bit ridiculous if you ask me. I actually think the role we currently have Middleton in is the best role for him, both now and throughout his career. Maybe he peaks at around 21 some seasons, but I feel 18 is the sweet spot.
KqWIN
RealGM
Posts: 15,520
And1: 6,361
Joined: May 15, 2014
 

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3800 » by KqWIN » Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:40 am

mattg wrote:It needs to be mentioned that usage% is a dumb stat that doesn't accurately reflect how much a player actually has the ball. It's theoretically possible for a player to dribble 23 seconds out of every shot clock for an entire game and still have a usage of zero.


Every stat is dumb when you use it for something it doesn't measure. That's like saying Middleton is a poor shooter because his block% is low.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks