Ron Swanson wrote:I'm actually fine with the thought process. I mean, everyone agreed we needed to get "younger and more athletic" right? Well, he certainly gives you both of those things, and I'll stress till the end of time that you should always be drafting upside in the NBA.
I'm just less enamored with the actual player. He was, and this can't be stressed enough, absolute garbage in the NBL. The shooting mechanics themselves seem fine, but sub-30% from 3 and sub-60% from the line is incredibly worrisome even at his age. It's like Horst watched the Combine scrimmage game and based his entire draft profile off of that. He's got some potential, but I'm not really sold he's actually this super high upside guy based just on the physical tools. Like, you're basically drafting a 19-20 year old high schooler. I legitimately think a guy like Chomche was a safer pick.
I can't really defend the him much as a prospect because you're right, he barely played and when he did, he played like crap.
But the sample sizes on those shooting %'s are so small...if just two of those free throws were a make instead of a miss he's at 70%. Even the FGAs is such a small sample it's hard to read much into it, but the free throws especially. I have to think the Bucks have access to his high school stats to try to build a larger sample size, but either way, I think they probably don't care how he's played in the past; they're banking on him improving immensely.
Edit: I see you already responded to this earlier in the thread lol