Ron Swanson wrote:Top-5 improvements he needs to make:
1) Free throws
2) Free throws
3) Free throws
4) Free throws
5) Free throws
Yep. We have a championship if he can hit FT's. I don't care about the 3 or jumpshot, just hit FT's.
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
Ron Swanson wrote:Top-5 improvements he needs to make:
1) Free throws
2) Free throws
3) Free throws
4) Free throws
5) Free throws
LISTEN2JAZZ wrote:I too would love to see Giannis progress on his post game and free throw shooting. I think Giannis surrounded by shooters makes way more sense than Giannis *as* the shooter. Giannis spending practice time behind the arc IMO makes only a little more sense than if Shaq had done that.
paulpressey25 wrote:aboveAverage wrote:Any info you can share with us PP?
There is just a rumor running in the deep corners of the interwebs that the owners will be meeting and finalizing all of this over the next 24-48 hours. So, until something happens one way or the other, I’m going to choose to be optimistic.
ABucksFan wrote:Ron Swanson wrote:Top-5 improvements he needs to make:
1) Free throws
2) Free throws
3) Free throws
4) Free throws
5) Free throws
Yep. We have a championship if he can hit FT's. I don't care about the 3 or jumpshot, just hit FT's.
har13 wrote:midranger wrote:ElPeregrino wrote:It's not a hard set number because it depends on the situation. For it to be acceptable to me for Giannis to pull up for three early in the shot clock, I think he needs to be making them at about 37-38%.
League average TS% was 57% last season. Giannis had a 77 TS% at the rim on 14.3 attempts per game. When shooting 4+ feet from the rim, Giannis had a 41 TS% on 10.2 attempts per game. I see that as an issue.
Bingo.
Antoine Walker shouldn’t have shot threes. Giannis is a comfortably worse shooter than Antoine Walker. Last year he shot them at a rate similar to Walker.
Giannis shooting a three should be worst case scenario for our offense. Giannis handling the ball at all outside the arc should be a solid Plan C.
To answer the original question, 35%.
7 out of 10 players we used against Miami shot 34% and less tho, the overall % without Giannis was actually less than 34.
coolhandluke121 wrote:har13 wrote:
So i ask, why is he Westbrook?
Simple. Impulsive decision-making and not making any concessions to his limitations. He's much more efficient than Westbrook because he's 7 feet tall, but that just makes it all the more infuriating that he shoots 3's. And even with his all-time great finishing ability, there's no excuse for going 1-on-3 so much. The free throws are a huge issue as well. And calling him a 7-foot Westbrook is not nearly the insult you seem to think it is, as Westbrook clearly had a MASSIVE impact on the game and some all-time great stat lines before his inevitable decline. However, despite having the best box scores in the league, I have grave doubts about whether his decision-making will ever improve enough to put him among the first 5 guys you'd want on your team deep in the playoffs. He's been talking about not charging into 3 guys and getting offensive fouls for years now, but he still does it just as much.
Finally, his reliance on raw athletic gifts reminds me a lot of Westbrook. Unlike Giannis, you could debate Westbrook's MVP credentials - however, you couldn't really debate that he had a huge positive impact when he was at his physical peak. More importantly, you can't really argue that there was ever any hope of continuing to be a star, let alone a superstar, after his late 20's. Giannis seems likely to have a similar trajectory. He'll be a level above Westbrook every step of the way due to his height, but he hasn't really added any significant polish to his raw physical gifts, and it's looking doubtful that he ever will. Fortunately we probably don't have to worry about that for 3-4 years.
Jstock12 wrote:ABucksFan wrote:Ron Swanson wrote:Top-5 improvements he needs to make:
1) Free throws
2) Free throws
3) Free throws
4) Free throws
5) Free throws
Yep. We have a championship if he can hit FT's. I don't care about the 3 or jumpshot, just hit FT's.
As long as he's shooting a good enough FT% to not get Hack-A-Shaqd, his FT% doesn't matter. At best it's a 1 or 1.5 pt difference to his PPG.
midranger wrote:har13 wrote:midranger wrote:Bingo.
Antoine Walker shouldn’t have shot threes. Giannis is a comfortably worse shooter than Antoine Walker. Last year he shot them at a rate similar to Walker.
Giannis shooting a three should be worst case scenario for our offense. Giannis handling the ball at all outside the arc should be a solid Plan C.
To answer the original question, 35%.
7 out of 10 players we used against Miami shot 34% and less tho, the overall % without Giannis was actually less than 34.
And we lost in 5.
Bad shooting doesn’t win games. Giannis is a terrible shooter.
emunney wrote:midranger wrote:har13 wrote:7 out of 10 players we used against Miami shot 34% and less tho, the overall % without Giannis was actually less than 34.
And we lost in 5.
Bad shooting doesn’t win games. Giannis is a terrible shooter.
He's also a great offensive rebounder, and can't do that from so far away. It's great for the transition defense to have him halfway down the court when the ball is rebounded, but that's a mitigation not an actual good.
midranger wrote:emunney wrote:midranger wrote:And we lost in 5.
Bad shooting doesn’t win games. Giannis is a terrible shooter.
He's also a great offensive rebounder, and can't do that from so far away. It's great for the transition defense to have him halfway down the court when the ball is rebounded, but that's a mitigation not an actual good.
Yes. We left many points on the court last year by having no focus on offensive rebounding. The Heat won the first few games in large part due to second chance opportunities.

emunney wrote:midranger wrote:emunney wrote:
He's also a great offensive rebounder, and can't do that from so far away. It's great for the transition defense to have him halfway down the court when the ball is rebounded, but that's a mitigation not an actual good.
Yes. We left many points on the court last year by having no focus on offensive rebounding. The Heat won the first few games in large part due to second chance opportunities.
A lot of those bounced first, it was ridiculous, like we were in quicksand.
paulpressey25 wrote:Going back to that lob that DJ Augustin tossed the other night. DJ and Jrue seem far better suited to feed Giannis. Make Giannis into a super mobile version of Shaq. NBA title awaits.
emunney wrote:midranger wrote:har13 wrote:7 out of 10 players we used against Miami shot 34% and less tho, the overall % without Giannis was actually less than 34.
And we lost in 5.
Bad shooting doesn’t win games. Giannis is a terrible shooter.
He's also a great offensive rebounder, and can't do that from so far away. It's great for the transition defense to have him halfway down the court when the ball is rebounded, but that's a mitigation not an actual good.