PG Hawks: Ridiculous

Packbuckman · Post #41 » by **Packbuckman** » Mon Mar 31, 2025 2:04 am

If anyone don’t think this is a coaching thing needs their head examined have prince start and then put on Trey young to get constantly blown by for open looks or pass as teammates have to help is just mind blowing. And then you bring in Pat for Giannis now you have two players getting blown by to either shoot or pass to open shooters. You don’t bring in Ajax till we are down 22 in the 3rd quarter watching this live tonite was just sickening I never left a game so early before what a waste of time and money!
I would fire Doc tomorrow if I owned the team!

ridetheskies · Post #42 » by **ridetheskies** » Mon Mar 31, 2025 2:05 am

Watch on YouTube

;si=T7LHupra4weLY3Ce

Matches Malone · Post #43 » by **Matches Malone** » Mon Mar 31, 2025 2:11 am

Read on Twitter

This guy stinks.

randy84 · Post #44 » by **randy84** » Mon Mar 31, 2025 2:12 am

I would get rid of Doc just to make sure he doesn't get kicked upstairs. I also think there are too many cooks in the kitchen. How many former or interim head coaches are on the staff? They can't all be agreeing. TP is Ham's guy and didn't the Lakers' fans have the same issue that Ham was favoring TP.

I am already to go Prunty for the rest of the year and then hire Jenkins.

Bernman · Post #45 » by **Bernman** » Mon Mar 31, 2025 2:16 am

randy84 wrote:I would get rid of Doc just to make sure he doesn't get kicked upstairs. I also think there are too many cooks in the kitchen. How many former or interim head coaches are on the staff? They can't all be agreeing. TP is Ham's guy and didn't the Lakers' fans have the same issue that Ham was favoring TP.

I am already to go Prunty for the rest of the year and then hire Jenkins.

If we rebuild, w/ little for prospects & picks going fw too, this is going to be a very unappealing coaching job. At that point, let's just be the 1st team to hire a female coach. You get the best of an overlooked lot then. It's not just a gimmick. I was against it when we flirted with Hammon but hired Bud. It was sensible to go for a proven coach when we were on the verge of contending. Now we need the prospect.

stellation · Post #46 » by **stellation** » Mon Mar 31, 2025 2:18 am

Matches Malone wrote:

Read on Twitter

This guy stinks.

Watch on YouTube

Plossum · Post #47 » by **Plossum** » Mon Mar 31, 2025 2:21 am

I had to go back and take a peek. I reckon this is worst team with a top 5 MVP vote getter since Steph in the 20/21 season. That warriors team finished 39-33 and eighth in the west. Out in the playin to the Grizz (worth noting Klay was out that whole season).

I guess they at least won the title the year after :lol:

Matches Malone · Post #48 » by **Matches Malone** » Mon Mar 31, 2025 2:23 am

Read on Twitter

WeMajor34 · Post #49 » by **WeMajor34** » Mon Mar 31, 2025 2:24 am

We’re reaching “if the team doesn’t care, why should I?” territory

We are one of the biggest laughingstocks in the league.

Post #50 » by **ReasonablySober** » Mon Mar 31, 2025 2:25 am

You're the best, VooDoo. Hoping upon hope for you to beat this.

tski1972 · Post #51 » by **tski1972** » Mon Mar 31, 2025 2:28 am

Thankfully we have the Brewers to take our minds off this disaster….

Watch on YouTube

Bucksmaniac · Post #52 » by **Bucksmaniac** » Mon Mar 31, 2025 2:30 am

Bernman wrote:
randy84 wrote:I would get rid of Doc just to make sure he doesn't get kicked upstairs. I also think there are too many cooks in the kitchen. How many former or interim head coaches are on the staff? They can't all be agreeing. TP is Ham's guy and didn't the Lakers' fans have the same issue that Ham was favoring TP.

I am already to go Prunty for the rest of the year and then hire Jenkins.

If we rebuild, w/ little for prospects & picks going fw too, this is going to be a very unappealing coaching job. At that point, let's just be the 1st team to hire a female coach. You get the best of an overlooked lot then. It's not just a gimmick. I was against it when we flirted with Hammon but hired Bud. It was sensible to go for a proven coach when we were on the verge of contending. Now we need the prospect.

I don’t want to get too in the weeds with this, but this similar type of thinking may have led to our last two coaching mistakes. Hoping it didn’t but wouldn’t rule it out. Take the best candidate to get this roster gelling even if it might challenge Giannis.

blazza18 · Post #53 » by **blazza18** » Mon Mar 31, 2025 2:31 am

I need Doc out of my life

fan230 · Post #54 » by **fan230** » Mon Mar 31, 2025 2:32 am

VooDoo7 wrote:This team gave me cancer.

I was very sorry to hear the news of your illness. I have dealt with that in my family and understand all the associated feelings. I am so glad that you are following the Bucks so closely even now. I and I am sure the rest of the board, are grateful for your support for the Bucks all these years. I wish you the very best; keep smiling. Go Bucks!

Bernman · Post #55 » by **Bernman** » Mon Mar 31, 2025 2:33 am

Bucksmaniac wrote:I don’t want to get too in the weeds with this, but this similar type of thinking may have led to our last two coaching mistakes. Hoping it didn’t but wouldn’t rule it out. Take the best candidate to get this roster gelling even if it might challenge Giannis.

No, it's not. It's the opposite. You're ignoring my point that the best coaching prospect we may have our disposal may well be a woman, because you're getting the top 1 of that list since it's an ignored group, & we're not going to be an appealing job to get a slam dunk hire.

If we rebuild, with what we likely have to work w/, we're going to be one of, if not the least appealing job(s) in the NBA. It may be very unappealing regardless because you could be taking over a sinking ship like Bud steered in Phoenix, & this one's not much better.

Bucksmaniac · Post #56 » by **Bucksmaniac** » Mon Mar 31, 2025 2:34 am

Matches Malone wrote:

Read on Twitter

Good chance that he’s lost the team now to where the effort isn’t there anymore, hence so clearly losing the hustle categories.

VooDoo7 · Post #57 » by **VooDoo7** » Mon Mar 31, 2025 2:35 am

fan230 wrote:
VooDoo7 wrote:This team gave me cancer.

I was very sorry to hear the news of your illness. I have dealt with that in my family and understand all the associated feelings. I am so glad that you are following the Bucks so closely even now. I and I am sure the rest of the board, are grateful for your support for the Bucks all these years. I wish you the very best; keep smiling. Go Bucks!

Thanks buddy. Despite everything, I won't let this **** kill my spirit. Sure, the Bucks might. But not terminal cancer. :lol:

Bucksmaniac · Post #58 » by **Bucksmaniac** » Mon Mar 31, 2025 2:37 am

Bernman wrote:
Bucksmaniac wrote:I don’t want to get too in the weeds with this, but this similar type of thinking may have led to our last two coaching mistakes. Hoping it didn’t but wouldn’t rule it out. Take the best candidate to get this roster gelling even if it might challenge Giannis.

No, it's not. It's the opposite. You're ignoring my point that the best coaching prospect we may have our disposal may well be a woman, because you're getting the top 1 of that list since it's an ignored group, & we're not going to be an appealing job to get a slam dunk hire.

There’s a chance certainly, but I don’t want to take it just due to that reason. If you truly like her answers then yes but not just based on the assumption that her demographics are overlooked.

VooDoo7 · Post #59 » by **VooDoo7** » Mon Mar 31, 2025 2:37 am

ReasonablySober wrote:You're the best, VooDoo. Hoping upon hope for you to beat this.

Thank you my friend. Even tho I have only met a few of you, you all mean the world to me. This place is family. Where else is there such a collective group of TRUE, die-hard Buck fans?

Post #60 » by **ReasonablySober** » Mon Mar 31, 2025 2:40 am

Bernman wrote:
Bucksmaniac wrote:I don’t want to get too in the weeds with this, but this similar type of thinking may have led to our last two coaching mistakes. Hoping it didn’t but wouldn’t rule it out. Take the best candidate to get this roster gelling even if it might challenge Giannis.

No, it's not. It's the opposite. You're ignoring my point that the best coaching prospect we may have our disposal may well be a woman, because you're getting the top 1 of that list since it's an ignored group, & we're not going to be an appealing job to get a slam dunk hire.

If we rebuild, with what we likely have to work w/, we're going to be one of, if not the least appealing job(s) in the NBA. It may be very unappealing regardless because you could be taking over a sinking ship like Bud steered in Phoenix, & this one's not much better.

I think you underestimate the egos of these people. Despite their current situation, coaches are going to look at the Bucks and believe Doc and Horst were the problems. Guys will lineup to coach Giannis (and potentially Dame).