ImageImage

Bucks @ Sixers Post-game Thread

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

 

Post#41 » by europa » Wed Jan 9, 2008 4:27 am

xTitan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I disagree....without Redd there is obviously a talent drop off but you can also see that this is a far better brand of team basketball we are talking about.


I didn't see a real good brand of basketball in the only game the Bucks have played against a playoff-caliber team thus far without Redd. In fact, it was pretty damn awful. It's great that in the last two wins guys like Bell, Villanueva and Simmons have done more. That's been great to see. Is that due to Redd's absence? Perhaps. But the true test will come should Redd miss any more games when the competition gets a whole lot tougher.
Nothing will not break me.
icat2000
RealGM
Posts: 14,254
And1: 42
Joined: Feb 25, 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia

 

Post#42 » by icat2000 » Wed Jan 9, 2008 4:30 am

And I would welcome that opportunity because I can't see how keeping Redd will benefit the Bucks in the future.
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

 

Post#43 » by xTitan » Wed Jan 9, 2008 4:31 am

europa wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I didn't see a real good brand of basketball in the only game the Bucks have played against a playoff-caliber team thus far without Redd. In fact, it was pretty damn awful. It's great that in the last two wins guys like Bell, Villanueva and Simmons have done more. That's been great to see. Is that due to Redd's absence? Perhaps. But the true test will come should Redd miss any more games when the competition gets a whole lot tougher.


I remember some aweful games recently...Denver/Detroit with Redd.......so if Redd comes back and they go back to the same old selfish one one basketball with Redd holding it until he takes a dazzling fade away jump shot....what does that tell us? All I heard Larry K. say tonight to Coshun was that the Bucks have been playing unselfish, team basketball and that needs to keep happening when Redd comes back....easy to read between the lines.
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

 

Post#44 » by europa » Wed Jan 9, 2008 4:34 am

xTitan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I remember some aweful games recently...Denver/Detroit with Redd.......so if Redd comes back and they go back to the same old selfish one one basketball with Redd holding it until he takes a dazzling fade away jump shot....what does that tell us? All I heard Larry K. say tonight to Coshun was that the Bucks have been playing unselfish, team basketball and that needs to keep happening when Redd comes back....easy to read between the lines.


You'll get no argument from me that the Bucks need to keep doing that and Redd needs to buy into this type of system. I also wonder how much better the team could be if Redd was healthy and guys like Bell, Villanueva and Simmons didn't stink up the joint most of the time. That's a factor - and in my opinion a significant one.
Nothing will not break me.
User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 27,935
And1: 15,492
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: The Land of Giannis.
     

 

Post#45 » by rilamann » Wed Jan 9, 2008 4:36 am

I agree with Xtitan.

Sure the Bucks have a more talented team out there when Redd is on the floor but without Redd the Bucks seem to ''play the right way'' to steal one from Larry Brown.

It seems like Redd's selfishness contaminates the whole team when he is the floor opposed to the Bucks playing more of an unselfish team style of basketball without Redd.

Like a case of one bad apple spoiling the entire bunch.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
Max Green
RealGM
Posts: 16,325
And1: 4,719
Joined: Jul 04, 2007
Location: Heelville
 

 

Post#46 » by Max Green » Wed Jan 9, 2008 4:38 am

europa wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



You'll get no argument from me that the Bucks need to keep doing that and Redd needs to buy into this type of system. I also wonder how much better the team could be if Redd was healthy and guys like Bell, Villanueva and Simmons didn't stink up the joint most of the time. That's a factor - and in my opinion a significant one.


Exactly, it's not like Bell, Vil and Simmons were hitting open jumpers and actually doing anything of signifigance on the court and Redd was denying them the ball when they were hot, he only did it to Yi :D
Vice President of Parker-Nation.
#Jabariunleashed
#OwnTheFuture
:wizard: Maxtradamus
User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 27,935
And1: 15,492
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: The Land of Giannis.
     

 

Post#47 » by rilamann » Wed Jan 9, 2008 4:51 am

xTitan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Or perhaps Kukoc, Blake, Mags, and Ford are saying...." I told you so"


Yea I always found it funny that both Steve Blake & Tj Ford said almost the exact same things in their post game interviews after playing agianst the Bucks after they where traded from the Bucks.

Both guys taking shots at the Bucks and basically saying ''it was great to now play on a team where guys want to win and theres no egos''.

But they both made it sound with their tone they where talking about 1 or 2 guys not the whole team.

I could never put my finger on who they where talking about..


Im 110% certian who they where talking about now,it has become very apparent this season. :lol:
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

 

Post#48 » by europa » Wed Jan 9, 2008 4:54 am

Maybe those guys were right and Redd is the problem but I'll say this - Steve Blake needs to keep his trap shut when asked about his time with the Bucks. The less he says, the less chances he'll remind anyone what a completely worthless piece of crap he was with this team.
Nothing will not break me.
User avatar
kebzach
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,397
And1: 11
Joined: Nov 13, 2006
Location: Illini Fan Trapped in WI

 

Post#49 » by kebzach » Wed Jan 9, 2008 4:56 am

An announced crowd of 10,045 was the third-lowest total at the Wachovia Center this season. It seemed as if only half of those who paid actually showed up.
Bucks Fan Dave
Banned User
Posts: 24
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 08, 2008

 

Post#50 » by Bucks Fan Dave » Wed Jan 9, 2008 5:24 am

I hope Redd is learning how to share the ball by watching from the bench. The turnovers were pretty sick but the well balanced scoring was nice. Bogut with another clutch shot down the end. :clap:

p.s. lets all cheer for Charlie Bell and make him feel at home tomorrow? 8)
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,141
And1: 27,758
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#51 » by trwi7 » Wed Jan 9, 2008 5:33 am

Okay I know this isn't about the Bucks but I was just watching NBA Fastbreak and one of their "analysts" said this about the Lakers/Grizzlies game.

"You know when you lose the 1st quarter by 16 and don't make up any ground the rest of the game you're going to have a tough time winning."
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Bucks Fan Dave
Banned User
Posts: 24
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 08, 2008

 

Post#52 » by Bucks Fan Dave » Wed Jan 9, 2008 5:36 am

sounds like Ted Davis on the radio when we stunk it up in the beginning of the third. "You can't score if you can't get any shots!"
User avatar
boknoy
Junior
Posts: 366
And1: 6
Joined: Jan 02, 2007
Location: Macau

 

Post#53 » by boknoy » Wed Jan 9, 2008 5:59 am

Bogut does that lefty pass from the back court to the streaking Williams who makes the basket plus a foul
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
Posts: 38,521
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
   

 

Post#54 » by WEFFPIM » Wed Jan 9, 2008 6:29 am

kebzach wrote:An announced crowd of 10,045 was the third-lowest total at the Wachovia Center this season. It seemed as if only half of those who paid actually showed up.


Well, it's not like the Bucks are an attractive matchup for...anyone
ReddWing wrote:Being a fan of this team is tantamount to being in hell...There is no Christ that is coming to save us. Even if there was, we'd trade him for a 28 year old wing.
User avatar
Nowak008
RealGM
Posts: 14,588
And1: 4,303
Joined: Jul 07, 2006
Location: Book Publisher
Contact:

 

Post#55 » by Nowak008 » Wed Jan 9, 2008 7:10 am

europa wrote:Maybe those guys were right and Redd is the problem but I'll say this - Steve Blake needs to keep his trap shut when asked about his time with the Bucks. The less he says, the less chances he'll remind anyone what a completely worthless piece of crap he was with this team.


Quit giving pieces of crap a bad name.



First televised game I missed so far this year. Its good that we pulled off a win. Looking at the box score Mo 21/9 on 50%, Bogut with 13/12 and actually made 75% of his FT, and the Charlies were big off the bench... very nice to see.

Could anyone give any details on how we won?
Image
John Hammond apologists:
emunney wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters


THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.
User avatar
paul
RealGM
Posts: 32,398
And1: 1,038
Joined: Dec 11, 2007
 

 

Post#56 » by paul » Wed Jan 9, 2008 7:26 am

Nowak008 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Quit giving pieces of crap a bad name.



First televised game I missed so far this year. Its good that we pulled off a win. Looking at the box score Mo 21/9 on 50%, Bogut with 13/12 and actually made 75% of his FT, and the Charlies were big off the bench... very nice to see.

Could anyone give any details on how we won?


Was a game of runs, there were like 3 10-12 point advantage runs by each side in the game. Bucks looked to be reasonably comfortable most of the time but then the sixers would get a run going and it ended pretty tight.
Two biggest plays were charlie v coming up with a prayer high glasser as the 24 was about to expire late, and then we were up two with about 30 secs to play on our possession, we moved the ball around until CV caught on the perimeter and made a strong move at the hole, he missed the drive but bogut came up with a huge tip in to hit his second game winner in 2 games.

Ball movement on offense was really good again, inside out game worked a treat. Bell, Bogut, CV and Mo were all excellent, Bell's jumper looked good again believe it or not, Simmons was ok and Yi was absent again, haven't checked the box but at one stage he was 0-7. Solid win against an average team in a not even half full arena, but the team ball was nice to watch. How's that?
User avatar
Sigra
RealGM
Posts: 15,419
And1: 1,465
Joined: Sep 08, 2005
Location: Aug 02, 2002
     

 

Post#57 » by Sigra » Wed Jan 9, 2008 10:48 am

LUKE23 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Simmons has sucked on D all year and at least CV gives scoring and rebounding. Simmons has had like one good game all damn year. Simmons should not be starting. No way, no how.


Not true anymore. Simmons is good this days. He do all little things and even play good defense. Last night, for example, he had Igy under control for most of the game (Igy scored some when CV was SF). Simmons should start from now on.

And Yi should not. At this moment Yi is not as good as CV. I am talking about that for weeks now. Start CV please. If he has defansive poblems then go with Yi.

2 of the biggest mistakes that Krystkowiak made were when he didn't start Simmons and CV in season opener. That hurt their confidence and moral and they are 2 of our 6 best players. Yi is rookie. He wouldn't mind playing from bench. Maybe Krystkowiak wanted to start CV but mgmt forced him to go with Yi because of "the promise". Who knows.

What I know for sure is that Yi is rookie and nowhere near a player that CV is right now. And healthy Bobby is still one of our most talented players. No metter how many people hate him
User avatar
Sigra
RealGM
Posts: 15,419
And1: 1,465
Joined: Sep 08, 2005
Location: Aug 02, 2002
     

 

Post#58 » by Sigra » Wed Jan 9, 2008 11:13 am

europa wrote:Maybe those guys were right and Redd is the problem but I'll say this - Steve Blake needs to keep his trap shut when asked about his time with the Bucks. The less he says, the less chances he'll remind anyone what a completely worthless piece of crap he was with this team.


He was a completely worthless piece of crap with Redd. He looked good before and after Redd. Just like many other players looked good and talented before and after Redd but never with Redd.
User avatar
paul
RealGM
Posts: 32,398
And1: 1,038
Joined: Dec 11, 2007
 

 

Post#59 » by paul » Wed Jan 9, 2008 11:19 am

Sigra wrote:Not true anymore. Simmons is good this days. He do all little things and even play good defense. Last night, for example, he had Igy under control for most of the game (Igy scored some when CV was SF). Simmons should start from now on.

And Yi should not. At this moment Yi is not as good as CV. I am talking about that for weeks now. Start CV please. If he has defansive poblems then go with Yi.

2 of the biggest mistakes that Krystkowiak made were when he didn't start Simmons and CV in season opener. That hurt their confidence and moral and they are 2 of our 6 best players. Yi is rookie. He wouldn't mind playing from bench. Maybe Krystkowiak wanted to start CV but mgmt forced him to go with Yi because of "the promise". Who knows.

What I know for sure is that Yi is rookie and nowhere near a player that CV is right now. And healthy Bobby is still one of our most talented players. No metter how many people hate him


Agreed, i too have been saying since the start of the season simmons and cv should be starting and should have started from the first game. There is just no way Yi is as big a threat on offense as CV right now, not even in the same league, and his D isn't that much better than charlies. Yi apart from his breakout game has actually been in a hole for a while now. The way i see it Lk has two problems.
1. He has to swallow his pride after possibly trying to make an example of CV and
2. Yi will be expecting to start now, and could get upset at getting benched. Had he have started the season on the bench and been made to earn his stripes like virtually every other rookie this isn't an issue.

Both of these problems were caused by LK for various reasons as i see it, so he needs to fix them.

Simmons in his prime is the best 3 on this team by the length of the BC floor, and therefore must start. I'm seeing better signs out of him in the past couple of weeks, we need to persist with him and do what we can to help him get back to somewhere near his potential level, it will help us immensely if he can. And if as rumored he is up for trade, more minutes and better play will enhance his value and give us a stronger trade position.
g77g77
Freshman
Posts: 70
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 11, 2007

 

Post#60 » by g77g77 » Wed Jan 9, 2008 3:22 pm

[quote="paul"][/quote]


i agree that CV needs to start, and LK must be able to make adjustments as the season go, who works hard and play team ball should play, Yi is a rookie and LK say he do what he's told to do, so i don't see any problem there.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks