Time for the Bogut doubting Fonzi's to say, I was wrrrrrr..

BuckFan25226 · Post #41 » by **BuckFan25226** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:26 pm

showtimesam wrote:People are morons.

How was bogut ever supposed to average over 12 ppg before this stretch?

He never got the damn ball on a consistent basis.

He also never demanded the ball, or should I say he doesn't demand the ball enough. Last night, he fought for position and demanded the ball. He was confident with the ball and decisive with the ball with no hesitation. He needs to do this EVERY SINGLE NIGHT.

[b]Now the lightbulb finally went off in LK"s head[/b
]

No, it went off in Bogut's head. But too often it goes back off for an extended period of time. Right now it seems to be shining bright.

The next step is for LK to keep that emphasis throughout the 4th quarter as well so the bucks can close out this game

The Bucks are not playing against crash test dummies. Bogut abused them and Utah adjusted well and denied Bogut the ball and made it very difficult to get involved last night in th
e 4th quarter.

Kablooie · Post #42 » by **Kablooie** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:32 pm

Yeah, Bogut is a superstar! So is Charlie Bell! Yey for only having a two week long memory!

xTitan · Post #43 » by **xTitan** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:48 pm

Kablooie wrote:Yeah, Bogut is a superstar! So is Charlie Bell! Yey for only having a two week long memory!

...you make MMBOT look like Jerry West.

Whiteman · Post #44 » by **Whiteman** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:53 pm

europa wrote:I saw Mo compared to Iverson not once but twice in the past week.

I saw Mo's style of play compared to Iverson's style twice in the past week. I didn't see anyone compare them quality-wise.

aussie_magic · Post #45 » by **aussie_magic** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:53 pm

im praying he can keep this up, not because he is a fellow aussie :wink:

but because he went number one in the draft automatically people are calling him a bust! look at what has happened when the coach decides to make andrew a focal point on the offence......

oh yeah if he keeps this up im really looking forward to beijing in regards to the aussie olympic team, we have some exciting young prospects, and with bogut holding down the middle, things are looking up for australian basketball, its died off here, no where near as popular as it was in the 90's, and if we can do well in beijing things will be looking up, and andrew bogut has ALOT to do with that.

Post #46 » by **blkout** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:59 pm

emunney wrote:What does Fonzi mean in Australia?

I can't say I've heard that one before myself. Evs.

Mike X · Post #47 » by **Mike X** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:17 pm

In regards to him living up to #1 status its way to early to start crowing.

But for those who constantly hammered home the belief he had no post-game despite the fact fact he rarely got the opportunity to develop it, well, I think its fair to say "YOU WERE WRONG".

And Sigra you wont allowed to enlist in the RBA (Royal Bogut Army) again. In fact if we see you around any of our camps we will hang you on the spot. :wink:

P.S. I refuse to beleive that some-one who supports Milwaukee would not know what Bigrichs "Fonzi" reference refers too.

trwi7 · Post #48 » by **trwi7** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:51 pm

emunney wrote:What does Fonzi mean in Australia?

WRau1 · Post #49 » by **WRau1** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 4:00 am

europa wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

I saw Mo compared to Iverson not once but twice in the past week.

That was awesome when AI passed the ball to Iggy off of the back of the backboard in the slamdunk comp and Kenny Smith was like "omg, give that man a 10, AI actually passed the ball!"

Carry on with the Bogut barnacle thread.

emunney · Post #50 » by **emunney** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 4:08 am

I know who Fonzi is, I just don't know what he has to do with people who hate Bogut. If it's just because that's all you know about Milwaukee, prepare to have every post responded to with every Aussie stereotype in existence and a few especially great ones which I'll invent.

WRau1 · Post #51 » by **WRau1** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 4:12 am

Thats not a knife. Now THATS a knife.

paul · Post #52 » by **paul** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 4:16 am

emunney wrote:I know who Fonzi is, I just don't know what he has to do with people who hate Bogut. If it's just because that's all you know about Milwaukee, prepare to have every post responded to with every Aussie stereotype in existence and a few especially great ones which I'll invent.

I think he was saying it because Fonzi could never say he was wrong, when he had to say it he'd say 'i was wrrrrrrrrr, i was wrrrrrrrr' etc. Pretty sure it had nothing to do with Milwaukee stereotypes.

emunney · Post #53 » by **emunney** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 4:31 am

Wow, you guys obviously watched the hell out of Happy Days.

Still, you're on my enemies list, Richo.

REDDzone · Post #54 » by **REDDzone** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 4:35 am

paul wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

I think he was saying it because Fonzi could never say he was wrong, when he had to say it he'd say 'i was wrrrrrrrrr, i was wrrrrrrrr' etc. Pretty sure it had nothing to do with Milwaukee stereotypes.

So that explains why the "wrrrr", but not why the Fonzi reference.

(Not that I care, I also just want to kno what a "Fonzi" is)

paul · Post #55 » by **paul** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 4:45 am

REDDzone wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

So that explains why the "wrrrr", but not why the Fonzi reference.

(Not that I care, I also just want to kno what a "Fonzi" is)

huh? Fonzi from happy days? he was the one who couldn't say he was wrong?

emunney · Post #56 » by **emunney** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 4:46 am

Apparently, everyone from Milwaukee is a Fonzi. At least we're not Ralph Malphs or Potsies, I guess.

paul · Post #57 » by **paul** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 4:49 am

emunney wrote:Apparently, everyone from Milwaukee is a Fonzi. At least we're not Ralph Malphs or Potsies, I guess.

Huh? Is that what you got out of it? I suspect most Aussies don't even relate Happy Days to Milwaukee, although I could be wrong.

emunney · Post #58 » by **emunney** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 4:54 am

In that case your first reply makes no sense to me.

bayrdbandit · Post #59 » by **bayrdbandit** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 4:54 am

REDDzone wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

So that explains why the "wrrrr", but not why the Fonzi reference.

(Not that I care, I also just want to kno what a "Fonzi" is)

his name was fonzie, arthur fonzarelli.

sit on it. :thumbsup:

paul · Post #60 » by **paul** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 4:55 am

bayrdbandit wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

his name was fonzie, arthur fonzarelli.

sit on it.

gold