WRau1 wrote:
SAC isn't doing better than a salary dump and picks for Bagley.
First, I don't agree at all. If he's dealt, I think they'll do better than just a straight salary dump. There are teams willing to take swings on guys like Bagley. If there weren't, Parker would have never gotten 20M from the Bulls. Like I just said, they're invested. Just because he holds X value to other teams in trade, doesn't mean they accept X value to do a deal. There's a disconnect with draft picks in that regard, especially those taken high and developed in house. I don't think they're motivated to deal him and the sunk cost fallacy plays into that.



















