Profound23 wrote:If it is true that Stotts basically wanted to run most of the offensive scheme through Dame and make Giannis the second banana, then good riddance.
Thought most of us wanted that…
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
Profound23 wrote:If it is true that Stotts basically wanted to run most of the offensive scheme through Dame and make Giannis the second banana, then good riddance.
Ron Swanson wrote:We've run the whole gambit of theories from blaming Griff, Giannis, Dame's body language, the hiring process/timeline, etc. But I'm surprised no one's brought up the possibility of:
"65-year old coach's offensive scheme/philosophy is outdated after being whisked out of retirement and didn't see the point in sticking around after realizing his ideas weren't being received warmly by the coaches and/or players".
Now we have some Blazers fans in the GB board speculating that Dame actually didn't care for Stotts towards the end of his tenure in Portland (which would also explain why he so eagerly signed off on Billups).
Tuxedo38 wrote:
Unless this marriage was made strictly to make Milwaukee more appealing to Dame (which kudos to Horst/whoever if true), why even force Stotts on Griffin? Like trust the guy enough to pick his own staff. Maybe push him to get a veteran mind on the staff because he's still a rookie head coach, but give him the ability to actually pick that specific guy. It sends the wrong message in my opinion and the chain of command can get muddied when issues arise.
Karsenmitsche wrote:If Rolo plays more than 15 minutes opening night i’m ready to start the fire train up
MVP2110 wrote:Daver wrote:MVP2110 wrote:
That's sort of the point. If AG gets the Bucks off to a fast start alot of this will die down, but if the Bucks get off to a slow start there is already alot of angst among the fanbase about Griff
So if bucks got off to a slow start n stotts was still there this board would still blame beas n AG not stotts so why does it matter if hes there or not.ACs dont get credit or blame
My point is most coaches get a honeymoon period or a grace period before the fanbase inevitably calls for them to be fired. AG has already seemingly burned through his and the season hasn't even started yet.

Tuxedo38 wrote:
Unless this marriage was made strictly to make Milwaukee more appealing to Dame (which kudos to Horst/whoever if true), why even force Stotts on Griffin? Like trust the guy enough to pick his own staff. Maybe push him to get a veteran mind on the staff because he's still a rookie head coach, but give him the ability to actually pick that specific guy. It sends the wrong message in my opinion and the chain of command can get muddied when issues arise.
Daver wrote:MVP2110 wrote:Daver wrote:
So if bucks got off to a slow start n stotts was still there this board would still blame beas n AG not stotts so why does it matter if hes there or not.ACs dont get credit or blame
My point is most coaches get a honeymoon period or a grace period before the fanbase inevitably calls for them to be fired. AG has already seemingly burned through his and the season hasn't even started yet.
Never had a honeymoon here most buck fans never wanted him as the bucks HC go back to when he was hired you see more posts calling it stupid or terrible etc.This fan base has never given grif a chance and it wont every loss every mistake will be magnified 2xs on this board by the grif sucks crowd.
He makes a decision he thinks is best for the team you n everyone else comes out questioning his every decision.From the very 1st day.He never had a grace period and its really sad
drew881 wrote:Profound23 wrote:If it is true that Stotts basically wanted to run most of the offensive scheme through Dame and make Giannis the second banana, then good riddance.
Thought most of us wanted that…
Karsenmitsche wrote:Ron Swanson wrote:We've run the whole gambit of theories from blaming Griff, Giannis, Dame's body language, the hiring process/timeline, etc. But I'm surprised no one's brought up the possibility of:
"65-year old coach's offensive scheme/philosophy is outdated after being whisked out of retirement and didn't see the point in sticking around after realizing his ideas weren't being received warmly by the coaches and/or players".
Now we have some Blazers fans in the GB board speculating that Dame actually didn't care for Stotts towards the end of his tenure in Portland (which would also explain why he so eagerly signed off on Billups).
everything dame has said about stotts since he’s been here has shown zero reasons for this to be plausible.
ABucksFan wrote:drew881 wrote:Profound23 wrote:If it is true that Stotts basically wanted to run most of the offensive scheme through Dame and make Giannis the second banana, then good riddance.
Thought most of us wanted that…
I think even Giannis wanted that
Shaffty wrote:Khris' quotes make it sound like Terry wasnt cut out for the assistant coach grind
MVP2110 wrote:Daver wrote:MVP2110 wrote:
My point is most coaches get a honeymoon period or a grace period before the fanbase inevitably calls for them to be fired. AG has already seemingly burned through his and the season hasn't even started yet.
Never had a honeymoon here most buck fans never wanted him as the bucks HC go back to when he was hired you see more posts calling it stupid or terrible etc.This fan base has never given grif a chance and it wont every loss every mistake will be magnified 2xs on this board by the grif sucks crowd.
He makes a decision he thinks is best for the team you n everyone else comes out questioning his every decision.From the very 1st day.He never had a grace period and its really sad
When coaches say stupid things I tend not to like them
As far as the rest of the fanbase I saw plenty of pro Griffin stuff when he was hired and alot of that has already turned against him
Daver wrote:MVP2110 wrote:Daver wrote:
Never had a honeymoon here most buck fans never wanted him as the bucks HC go back to when he was hired you see more posts calling it stupid or terrible etc.This fan base has never given grif a chance and it wont every loss every mistake will be magnified 2xs on this board by the grif sucks crowd.
He makes a decision he thinks is best for the team you n everyone else comes out questioning his every decision.From the very 1st day.He never had a grace period and its really sad
When coaches say stupid things I tend not to like them
As far as the rest of the fanbase I saw plenty of pro Griffin stuff when he was hired and alot of that has already turned against him
You must of really hated bud then yes cause 95% of what bud said was stupid things
Shaffty wrote:Khris' quotes make it sound like Terry wasnt cut out for the assistant coach grind
Ron Swanson wrote:Where was that Giannis quote where he said something like "I'll set as many screens as they want me to set"?
GUYS! SOMEBODY'S LYING!!!!
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote: I think that we will do worse than last season and that Giannis is now just a mere all star. All because we switched from Bud to Griffin.