ImageImage

Bucks talking Asik

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,706
And1: 6,866
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: Bucks talking Asik 

Post#61 » by LUKE23 » Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:35 pm

Asik's salary is only $8M in 14-15, but his cap hit is $15M. Of all the curious moves the Bucks have made under Bone, this would rank right up there. It's not like we'd be trading junk to acquiring him. So even from a "hey, this can help us win!!" standpoint, it makes no sense. The only thing I could even think of was that they would view clearing Ilyasova's 15-16 salary as a positive, but that still isn't enough incentive, and his 16-17 salary is only minimally guaranteed.

To summarize, this makes no goddam sense whatsoever.
Serge28
RealGM
Posts: 16,268
And1: 1,894
Joined: Apr 30, 2002
Location: San Diego
 

Re: Bucks talking Asik 

Post#62 » by Serge28 » Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:35 pm

We got Sanders at C and he is 100% incapable of playing PF. We have Henson who's been playing center even and, even though he's too skinny right now, unless he significantly improves his outside jumper, it looks like he'll have difficulties playing PF alongside Sanders (at least offensively). We have Udoh. We have Zaza. Why the **** do we need Asik who's going to be 28 next summer and 29 when his $15 million contact expires in the summer of 2015. This makes 0 sense. If it goes down... fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
In Giannis We Trust
User avatar
BobbyLight
RealGM
Posts: 10,027
And1: 1,546
Joined: Jul 29, 2004
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Contact:
 

Re: Bucks talking Asik 

Post#63 » by BobbyLight » Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:35 pm

JayMKE wrote:I suspect the actual trade will be much worse for us, Hammond needs a restraining order against Morey.


I remember last trade deadline. It sounded like a bunch of stupid deals were on the table. When a deal actually happened.... it was worse than any of us imagined. I wouldn't be surprised to see the repeated.
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 19,188
And1: 4,009
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: Bucks talking Asik 

Post#64 » by BUCKnation » Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:37 pm

Image
H2tObes
RealGM
Posts: 19,562
And1: 10,022
Joined: Oct 18, 2012

Re: Bucks talking Asik 

Post#65 » by H2tObes » Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:37 pm

This means Sanders would be gone. It's really fair value, and won't win us any games...seeing as how we still struggle to put up 80 on any given night.

The part that would really piss me off is this would lead to trading Sanders for pennies on the dollar. Only Way I like this is if it turns into a Sanders/Mayo for Adams/Lamb/OKC 1st/Perkins deal
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,706
And1: 6,866
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: Bucks talking Asik 

Post#66 » by LUKE23 » Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:37 pm

Bone should not be allowed to make any trades. Every time he does he gets owned.
User avatar
Badgerlander
RealGM
Posts: 26,916
And1: 7,368
Joined: Jun 29, 2007
     

Re: Bucks talking Asik 

Post#67 » by Badgerlander » Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:37 pm

I like Asik but he doesn't fit this team and this deal makes zero sense for the Bucks. Lets make our offense even more guard orientated yet take away the guy that can help spread the floor for them? Plus it's awful return for Ersan+Wolters+Udoh. A realgm could get better return for that package, it's a total rape by Morey of our FO.
Shoot, Move, and Communicate...

Spoiler:

I'm just here for my own amusement,"don't take offense at my innuendo..."


Countless waze, we pass the daze...

A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
User avatar
Matches Malone
RealGM
Posts: 35,248
And1: 25,612
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: Bucks talking Asik 

Post#68 » by Matches Malone » Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:38 pm

Cue the BuckPack signal!!!!

Anyone who has Hammonds number needs to politely talk him out of this. For the love of god please!
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
User avatar
cinematographer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,754
And1: 1,697
Joined: Feb 22, 2013

Re: Bucks talking Asik 

Post#69 » by cinematographer » Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:39 pm

LUKE23 wrote:Asik's salary is only $8M in 14-15, but his cap hit is $15M. Of all the curious moves the Bucks have made under Bone, this would rank right up there. It's not like we'd be trading junk to acquiring him. So even from a "hey, this can help us win!!" standpoint, it makes no sense. The only thing I could even think of was that they would view clearing Ilyasova's 15-16 salary as a positive, but that still isn't enough incentive, and his 16-17 salary is only minimally guaranteed.

To summarize, this makes no goddam sense whatsoever.

I think it's flipped, actually. Salary will be $15 but cap hit is $8. The cap hit would've been $15 for the Knicks had they matched, that's why Houston offered the poison pill.
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,099
And1: 25,062
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: Bucks talking Asik 

Post#70 » by Baddy Chuck » Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:39 pm

DocHoliday wrote:Plus it's awful return for Ersan+Wolters+Udoh.

I don't really think that's true at all. Value wise it really isn't bad.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
whatthe_buck!?
Banned User
Posts: 5,142
And1: 163
Joined: Jul 20, 2006

Re: Bucks talking Asik 

Post#71 » by whatthe_buck!? » Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:39 pm

Let me get my MBBOT on for a sec:
THIS IS EXACTLY WHY WE CAN'T BE DEALING WITH MORWAY!!!!!!!!11!1!1!!1!1!! :-( :-( :-(
This seems at first glance like a somewhat even trade until u realize that we're killing millions in cap space and flexibility for next year AND giving up on Wolters before we even know what the hell we have. And it's not like he hasn't flashed, he's been incredible in the time he's gotten as far as production for a rookie second rounder. We also get back zero players who have developmental potential.

And the fact that Morway is making us include Nate makes me feel like Wolters could be a future Hall of Famer or something, Jesus don't give him unknown players he's targeted smh. If the FO is deadset on a Ers for Asik trade offer the same trade without Wolters and if Morway eventually accepts then whatever, still not a good trade for us because its a lateral move as far as talent and it hurt next years cap, but if he won't accept that deal without Wolters then run dont walk away from the f*cking negotiating table and sign Wolters to a lifetime contract immediately.

SOMEBODY IN OUR FRONT OFFICE NEEDS TO GROW SOME F*CKING BALLS TO STAND UP TO THE KOHL MANDATE. He got his way with the offseason signings of and trades for vets and it didnt work out. Tell him u tried it his way and now he needs to sit down and shut up. If he fires u at least u can exit this abortion of a front office with a modicum of self respect...
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,706
And1: 6,866
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: Bucks talking Asik 

Post#72 » by LUKE23 » Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:40 pm

cinematographer wrote:I think it's flipped, actually. Salary will be $15 but cap hit is $8. The cap hit would've been $15 for the Knicks had they matched, that's why Houston offered the poison pill.


Yeah I misspoke, this is correct.
bizarro
RealGM
Posts: 14,778
And1: 7,290
Joined: Jul 13, 2005

Re: Bucks talking Asik 

Post#73 » by bizarro » Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:40 pm

H2tObes wrote:This means Sanders would be gone. It's really fair value, and won't win us any games...seeing as how we still struggle to put up 80 on any given night.

The part that would really piss me off is this would lead to trading Sanders for pennies on the dollar. Only Way I like this is if it turns into a Sanders/Mayo for Adams/Lamb/OKC 1st/Perkins deal


Giving the Bucks any benefit of the doubt is the definition of insanity. How many times in the past have we been saying: "There has to be more to this deal. There has to be more!?!?" And, then...crickets.

Our beloved organization has no multi-faceted plan. They are simply a room of fumbling idiots who react at all costs in their quest for the playoffs. 5 - 17. Postured beautifully for potentially the best draft in over a decade...let's trade and go for that coveted 8th seed. After all, the Eastern Conference is weak. Maybe, just maybe, that means we have a shot against Indiana and Miami too. :D
whatthe_buck!?
Banned User
Posts: 5,142
And1: 163
Joined: Jul 20, 2006

Re: Bucks talking Asik 

Post#74 » by whatthe_buck!? » Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:41 pm

cinematographer wrote:
LUKE23 wrote:Asik's salary is only $8M in 14-15, but his cap hit is $15M. Of all the curious moves the Bucks have made under Bone, this would rank right up there. It's not like we'd be trading junk to acquiring him. So even from a "hey, this can help us win!!" standpoint, it makes no sense. The only thing I could even think of was that they would view clearing Ilyasova's 15-16 salary as a positive, but that still isn't enough incentive, and his 16-17 salary is only minimally guaranteed.

To summarize, this makes no goddam sense whatsoever.

I think it's flipped, actually. Salary will be $15 but cap hit is $8. The cap hit would've been $15 for the Knicks had they matched, that's why Houston offered the poison pill.

I think you're both wrong. I think the salary cap hit is 15 million but that the salary as far as trade purposes is 8 million. I'm pretty sure about that.
User avatar
tski1972
Head Coach
Posts: 6,267
And1: 3,733
Joined: May 24, 2011
Location: Wow-saw, WI
Contact:
     

Re: Bucks talking Asik 

Post#75 » by tski1972 » Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:42 pm

why Wolters? Houston has 4 PG on their roster already.
http://twitter.com/MarkIsOld

Image

"Because of Giannis, the once lousy Bucks are back in the NBA conversation." - 60 Minutes
User avatar
Badgerlander
RealGM
Posts: 26,916
And1: 7,368
Joined: Jun 29, 2007
     

Re: Bucks talking Asik 

Post#76 » by Badgerlander » Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:43 pm

Baddy Chuck wrote:
DocHoliday wrote:Plus it's awful return for Ersan+Wolters+Udoh.

I don't really think that's true at all. Value wise it really isn't bad.

Personally I think Ersan is worth Asik straight up easilly.


So we go from 8 PFs on he roster a few years ago to now having 4 Centers and no PFs? wtf
Shoot, Move, and Communicate...

Spoiler:

I'm just here for my own amusement,"don't take offense at my innuendo..."


Countless waze, we pass the daze...

A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,099
And1: 25,062
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: Bucks talking Asik 

Post#77 » by Baddy Chuck » Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:44 pm

tski1972 wrote:why Wolters? Houston has 4 PG on their roster already.

Because Morey knows he could suck any little bit of value out of Kohl and the gang that he wants.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
User avatar
Wooderson
RealGM
Posts: 13,147
And1: 5,850
Joined: Mar 03, 2008

Re: Bucks talking Asik 

Post#78 » by Wooderson » Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:47 pm

whatthe_buck!? wrote:
cinematographer wrote:
LUKE23 wrote:Asik's salary is only $8M in 14-15, but his cap hit is $15M. Of all the curious moves the Bucks have made under Bone, this would rank right up there. It's not like we'd be trading junk to acquiring him. So even from a "hey, this can help us win!!" standpoint, it makes no sense. The only thing I could even think of was that they would view clearing Ilyasova's 15-16 salary as a positive, but that still isn't enough incentive, and his 16-17 salary is only minimally guaranteed.

To summarize, this makes no goddam sense whatsoever.

I think it's flipped, actually. Salary will be $15 but cap hit is $8. The cap hit would've been $15 for the Knicks had they matched, that's why Houston offered the poison pill.

I think you're both wrong. I think the salary cap hit is 15 million but that the salary as far as trade purposes is 8 million. I'm pretty sure about that.


The cap hit is definitely 8 and salary owed is 15 (for next year).
H2tObes
RealGM
Posts: 19,562
And1: 10,022
Joined: Oct 18, 2012

Re: Bucks talking Asik 

Post#79 » by H2tObes » Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:47 pm

bizarro wrote:
H2tObes wrote:This means Sanders would be gone. It's really fair value, and won't win us any games...seeing as how we still struggle to put up 80 on any given night.

The part that would really piss me off is this would lead to trading Sanders for pennies on the dollar. Only Way I like this is if it turns into a Sanders/Mayo for Adams/Lamb/OKC 1st/Perkins deal


Giving the Bucks any benefit of the doubt is the definition of insanity. How many times in the past have we been saying: "There has to be more to this deal. There has to be more!?!?" And, then...crickets.

Our beloved organization has no multi-faceted plan. They are simply a room of fumbling idiots who react at all costs in their quest for the playoffs. 5 - 17. Postured beautifully for potentially the best draft in over a decade...let's trade and go for that coveted 8th seed. After all, the Eastern Conference is weak. Maybe, just maybe, that means we have a shot against Indiana and Miami too. :D

I don't have any confidence in our FO to do something smart, but I won't rag on them for doing something stupid until it actually happens. Just trying to keep calm here :-?
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,706
And1: 6,866
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: Bucks talking Asik 

Post#80 » by LUKE23 » Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:47 pm

Yeah, wouldn't shock me at all to see us completely **** up a Sanders trade in addition to this.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks