But will lamb or TJones be there at 14? I see that PJIII is going too Houston for a 2nd look.Wise1 wrote:JoeJohnson2two wrote:Wise1 wrote:Portland will take hometown kid Terrance Ross with the pick at 11. They may feel that he'll be better than both Monta and Matthews. No real incentive for them to deal for Monta. The Bucks may have realized that both Lamb (10) and Ross (11) will be gone so leaving pick 12 for 14 makes even more sense.
If Portland goes with Lillard at 6, a big will be the pick at 11, guaranteed. It's either Drummond/Ross or Lillard/Zeller IMO.
No way in hell Portland takes Zeller. Ross will be the pick at 11 unless he's gone. The decision will be Drummond or Lillard at 6.
I HOPE Ross is there, but I don't think he makes it past Portland....and I believe the Bucks knew that.
#12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,007
- And1: 2,260
- Joined: Jul 25, 2005
- Location: Central Wisconsin
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- paul
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,398
- And1: 1,038
- Joined: Dec 11, 2007
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
Baddy Chuck wrote:Wilson Chandler would just be another overpaid mediocre player.
The Warriors proposal of #7 for Chandler has been debunked as myth FWIW.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- Wise1
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,261
- And1: 256
- Joined: Jun 27, 2005
- Location: Devouring worlds.
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
Mike, I think Perry Jones is going to be a career underachiever along the lines of a Tim Thomas. DO NOT WANT.
Can't really endorse Terrance Jones from Kentucky since we will have a logjam at his position. At 14, I see the Bucks taking one of these three if available:
1. Lamb
2. Ross
3. Leonard
Can't really endorse Terrance Jones from Kentucky since we will have a logjam at his position. At 14, I see the Bucks taking one of these three if available:
1. Lamb
2. Ross
3. Leonard
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,779
- And1: 6,991
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
Honestly, if they re up Ersan I could see this team being pretty damn solid, maybe FTDish type team. But as the roster stands today, its probably the worst offensive front court in the league. Four good defenders there, but wow a lack of offensive skill.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- Baddy Chuck
- RealGM
- Posts: 51,281
- And1: 25,436
- Joined: Apr 18, 2006
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
No thanks to Terrence Jones.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- paulpressey25
- Senior Mod - Bucks
- Posts: 62,654
- And1: 29,766
- Joined: Oct 27, 2002
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
LUKE23 wrote:Honestly, if they re up Ersan I could see this team being pretty damn solid
Everyone has their draft favorites, but if they lucked into Lamb at 14 (I like him better than Ross) and re-sign Ersan, they should be a 42-win team.
I still wish they would drop a big money offer sheet on Eric Gordon to see what happens.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,779
- And1: 6,991
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
I thought they were about a .500 team with Ersan and before Dalembert. If they re up Ersan and get a guy in the draft that can add shooting, I think this team wins 45 or more. Which for this franchise is basically a title. Without Ilyasova though, wow our front court is bad offensively.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,987
- And1: 27,593
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
LUKE23 wrote: But as the roster stands today, its probably the worst offensive front court in the league. Four good defenders there, but the worst defender will play the most minutes.
Fixed.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- buckboy
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,167
- And1: 8,543
- Joined: Nov 05, 2004
- Location: At the Gettin' Place
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
My preference has changed to:
Lamb
Ross
T Jones
Leonard
Barring Waiters dropping which I just can't see.
Lamb
Ross
T Jones
Leonard
Barring Waiters dropping which I just can't see.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- Wise1
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,261
- And1: 256
- Joined: Jun 27, 2005
- Location: Devouring worlds.
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
Baddy Chuck wrote:No thanks to Terrence Jones.
Agreed. By elimination, I think the choice will come down to Leonard versus Rivers.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- Baddy Chuck
- RealGM
- Posts: 51,281
- And1: 25,436
- Joined: Apr 18, 2006
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
Wise1 wrote:Baddy Chuck wrote:No thanks to Terrence Jones.
Agreed. By elimination, I think the choice will come down to Leonard versus Rivers.
Which I would say no thanks to as well.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,007
- And1: 2,260
- Joined: Jul 25, 2005
- Location: Central Wisconsin
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
Wait for it, but I predict the Bucks take--------- Melo. 

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- SheedsWeed
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,931
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 30, 2004
- Location: to all the killas and the hundred dolla billas
- Contact:
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
Wise1 wrote:Baddy Chuck wrote:No thanks to Terrence Jones.
Agreed. By elimination, I think the choice will come down to Leonard versus Rivers.
I don't think Rivers will be there at 14.
Leonard might, and Ross might, so it could be between those. I'd like to think the Bucks take Ross easily over Leonard too, but idk.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,007
- And1: 2,260
- Joined: Jul 25, 2005
- Location: Central Wisconsin
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
I think Ross wiil be gone before 14, since Lamb has too many red flags.SheedsWeed wrote:Wise1 wrote:Baddy Chuck wrote:No thanks to Terrence Jones.
Agreed. By elimination, I think the choice will come down to Leonard versus Rivers.
I don't think Rivers will be there at 14.
Leonard might, and Ross might, so it could be between those. I'd like to think the Bucks take Ross easily over Leonard too, but idk.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- MikeIsGood
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,876
- And1: 11,742
- Joined: Jul 10, 2003
- Location: Vamos Rafa
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
Still hope we trade up, even if it's to target Drummond who I don't really like at all. It's just the perfect gamble that this franchise needs to take.
Which is why it won't happen.
Which is why it won't happen.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- paulpressey25
- Senior Mod - Bucks
- Posts: 62,654
- And1: 29,766
- Joined: Oct 27, 2002
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
In the WSSP interview Hammond seemed pretty adamant that they view this as a 14 player draft before the tier breaks down again, hence no gamble in moving down from 12 to 14. i.e. they'd get someone they like guaranteed.
Ford's mock has Leonard and Zeller both gone before we reach 14. The question is what happens if only one of those guys is taken and one is left for us? Maybe they don't care and would be happy either way.
Ford's mock has Leonard and Zeller both gone before we reach 14. The question is what happens if only one of those guys is taken and one is left for us? Maybe they don't care and would be happy either way.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,637
- And1: 3,220
- Joined: Jan 03, 2006
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
This deal is low upside and low risk, sensible you might say. I think it is going to be a guy at 14 that hasnt been highly mocked in the top 15, like R White, M Harkless, or Barton. It will be fun to monitor the internet for breaking news tomorrow, one of my favorite days of the year.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- mlloyd10
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,072
- And1: 956
- Joined: Jan 18, 2012
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
just trade 14/luc for Ross and be done with it
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- [MIKE C]
- Senior
- Posts: 708
- And1: 187
- Joined: Apr 17, 2012
- Location: Waukesha, WI.
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
MikeIsGood wrote:Still hope we trade up, even if it's to target Drummond who I don't really like at all. It's just the perfect gamble that this franchise needs to take.
Which is why it won't happen.
+1
And I like the idea of taking a shot on Drummond. Big risk but the type of gamble this franchise needs to take. I think adding Dalembert to the C spot for this year makes it easier to take a chance on Drummond.
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
- JoeJohnson2two
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 951
- And1: 67
- Joined: Apr 18, 2006
- Location: Joe Johnson's closet
-
Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert
Wise1 wrote:No way in hell Portland takes Zeller. Ross will be the pick at 11 unless he's gone. The decision will be Drummond or Lillard at 6.
I HOPE Ross is there, but I don't think he makes it past Portland....and I believe the Bucks knew that.
The Blazers NEED a center. I'll guarantee that they take a big with #11 if they choose to go Lillard at 6. Hell, Zeller might not even be there. The Hornets loved Zeller and may take him #10. Then the Blazers/Rockets take Leonard at 11/12. Drummond, Zeller and Leonard will all be gone before 14. Bookmark it, do whatever you want. We will be "forced" to choose a wing. Whether it be Ross, Lamb, PJIII or Harkless.