AussieBuck wrote:I like your style, throw in Curry and we have a deal.
Deal, but we'll have to wait for Miami to release him first; he ought to be off the team by next week at the latest.

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
AussieBuck wrote:I like your style, throw in Curry and we have a deal.
Jajwanda wrote:Luke Walton (he'll never give you chemistry problems). You might even save a couple million in a deal.
Jajwanda wrote:Nah we'd pass, but who would pay the expiring for Jackson?
paulpressey25 wrote:Jajwanda wrote:Nah we'd pass, but who would pay the expiring for Jackson?
We'll figure a three way deal if needed. San Antonio, Atlanta, Orlando, etc would all likely take him.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Jajwanda wrote:Luke Walton (he'll never give you chemistry problems). You might even save a couple million in a deal.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
trwi7 wrote:I think you're being way too optimistic about Jackson's value and the teams who would want him.
aboveAverage wrote:You're way overvaluing Jackson's worth, Press. No way he gets us anything positive at this point.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
EastSideBucksFan wrote:The Knicks, Bulls and Lakers are the three best landing spots for Jax but none have much I want.
worthlessBucks wrote:EastSideBucksFan wrote:
I hope someone can find a link to that. Would love to hear it.
Jackson sucks.
http://wssp.radiotown.com/audio/bucks_post/JAXRAW.mp3