Woelfel - 70% bogut's gone and maybe Jennings (update pg131)

paul · Post #81 » by **paul** » Fri Mar 9, 2012 12:19 am

trwi7 wrote:
mcfromage wrote:He speculate at all on possible destinations?

No, he did say he talked to a lot of players, coaches and GM's though.

Gery wants to see his name on the ticker of yahoo, ESPN and realGM (:wink:), don't need any actual information or actual sources to get that.

kebzach · Post #82 » by **kebzach** » Fri Mar 9, 2012 12:20 am

SkilesTheLimit wrote:Good riddence.

He's not taking this team anywhere, and in a sense, has been holding the organization hostage over the last several years as a walking injury-in-waiting.

They better get a mid to high 1st for him.

I'd argue Jennings has held the organization just as much hostage, if not more. The Bucks seem to honestly believe that BJ will suddenly turn the corner and become a top 5-10 PG in the NBA. And, we're on year #3 of waiting for that moment to happen.

Personally, I'd rather keep Bogut. And, if Jennings is back next season, I won't be a season ticket holder.

Nebula1 · Post #83 » by **Nebula1** » Fri Mar 9, 2012 12:23 am

Good news if true, but I don't buy much that comes from Woelfel. Would love to get Detroit's lotto or Toronto's lotto.

kebzach · Post #84 » by **kebzach** » Fri Mar 9, 2012 12:23 am

Aaron It Out wrote:If there has ever been an NBA player playing out of his mind for a new contract/to get out of Milwuakee, it's Ersan.

Comment of the day.

smauss · Post #85 » by **smauss** » Fri Mar 9, 2012 12:25 am

Like I've said before, Ersan as a solid rotation player/spot starter on a contender would be a perfect position for him. He is a good basketball player. Unfortunately, the Bucks are in nowhere near that position, therefore it makes the best sense for both parties to move him.

DanoMac · Post #86 » by **DanoMac** » Fri Mar 9, 2012 12:26 am

kebzach wrote:
SkilesTheLimit wrote:Good riddence.

He's not taking this team anywhere, and in a sense, has been holding the organization hostage over the last several years as a walking injury-in-waiting.

They better get a mid to high 1st for him.

I'd argue Jennings has held the organization just as much hostage, if not more. The Bucks seem to honestly believe that BJ will suddenly turn the corner and become a top 5-10 PG in the NBA. And, we're on year #3 of waiting for that moment to happen.

Personally, I'd rather keep Bogut. And, if Jennings is back next season, I won't be a season ticket holder.

Jennings has been here since 2009. Bogut's been here since 2005. No way Jennings has held the Bucks just as much hostage as Bogut has.

Like stated, Bogut is an injury waiting to happen. Every single season. You can realistically expect Bogut to play 60-65 games per season, at most. His recent string of unfortunate events has left us with too many questions to answer regarding the team.

Jennings has only started to get bad. Maybe, if we hang on to him, he'll eventually get to where Bogut is. But no way is he there right now.

EDIT: But I do understand where you're coming from when you put Jennings' erratic play into question.

thakfu · Post #87 » by **thakfu** » Fri Mar 9, 2012 12:31 am

braindazer wrote:If we trade Andrew squad 6 will be gone and there won't be anyone at the BC .

maybe Jax would just take it over and rename it "Trill Style Booze N Chants During-Game Party hosted by Stephen Jackson of the NBA's Milwaukee Bucks"

Post #88 » by **blkout** » Fri Mar 9, 2012 12:32 am

Best news I've heard in a while

paul · Post #89 » by **paul** » Fri Mar 9, 2012 12:32 am

DanoMac wrote:
kebzach wrote:
SkilesTheLimit wrote:Good riddence.

He's not taking this team anywhere, and in a sense, has been holding the organization hostage over the last several years as a walking injury-in-waiting.

They better get a mid to high 1st for him.

I'd argue Jennings has held the organization just as much hostage, if not more. The Bucks seem to honestly believe that BJ will suddenly turn the corner and become a top 5-10 PG in the NBA. And, we're on year #3 of waiting for that moment to happen.

Personally, I'd rather keep Bogut. And, if Jennings is back next season, I won't be a season ticket holder.

Jennings has been here since 2009. Bogut's been here since 2005. No way Jennings has held the Bucks just as much hostage as Bogut has.

Like stated, Bogut is an injury waiting to happen. Every single season. You can realistically expect Bogut to play 60-65 games per season, at most. His recent string of unfortunate events has left us with too many questions to answer regarding the team.

Jennings has only started to get bad. Maybe, if we hang on to him, he'll eventually get to where Bogut is. But no way is he there right now.

EDIT: But I do understand where you're coming from when you put Jennings' erratic play into question.

Is playing absolutely terrible for 30 games a season better than not playing 20 games a season?

paul · Post #90 » by **paul** » Fri Mar 9, 2012 12:32 am

blkout wrote:Best news I've heard in a while

Sadly it's not, check the source.

Post #91 » by **blkout** » Fri Mar 9, 2012 12:33 am

BuckPack wrote:Gery is exaggerating the odds quite a bit here.

Oh

JimmyTheKid · Post #92 » by **JimmyTheKid** » Fri Mar 9, 2012 12:34 am

I'd have mixed feelings if they moved him. I really do like his game but he can never stay on the court. If they move him for a "win now" trade I might never watch NBA basketball again. "70/30" from Woelfel means nothing. But why would he put such ridiculous odds out there? Very interesting.

Again, I ask the Aussie fans, if this happens, what do you do as far as your fan allegiance? I doubt it would be too difficult to completely bail on this pathetic organization. Just trying to get a feel for where your collective heads are at.

Baddy Chuck · Post #93 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Fri Mar 9, 2012 12:34 am

I don't care if the odds are 10/90, the fact that they are open to trading Bogut is great news.

Nebula1 · Post #94 » by **Nebula1** » Fri Mar 9, 2012 12:37 am

I would assume Minnesota is on the table if true.

Post #95 » by **blkout** » Fri Mar 9, 2012 12:37 am

JimmyTheKid wrote:Again, I ask the Aussie fans, if this happens, what do you do as far as your fan allegiance? I doubt it would be too difficult to completely bail on this pathetic organization. Just trying to get a feel for where your collective heads are at.

Bogut being traded makes me more interested in the team providing they don't go out and trade him for "veterans" then I'll stay the same level of disinterested I've been all season.

I'll definitely continue following his career and if the Bucks continue to put out the same .400 ball Drew Gooden 20 shots per game garbage I'd probably rather watch a Bogut game than a Bucks game but I'd be way more excited about being a Bucks fan if Bogut was gone.

smauss · Post #96 » by **smauss** » Fri Mar 9, 2012 12:37 am

paul wrote:
Is playing absolutely terrible for 30 games a season better than not playing 20 games a season?

Was thinking exactly the same thing, Paul. :lol:

hardyshuffles · Post #97 » by **hardyshuffles** » Fri Mar 9, 2012 12:46 am

omg please please let this happen. Finally he could then be utilised to his full capacity for a team that knows how to use him.

Post #98 » by **blkout** » Fri Mar 9, 2012 12:47 am

Good day for chrisbh

Baddy Chuck · Post #99 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Fri Mar 9, 2012 12:54 am

hardyshuffles wrote:omg please please let this happen. Finally he could then be utilised to his full capacity for a team that knows how to use him.

Then we only have to read your posts the 2 or 4 times a year we play him!

:rockon:

UWM_Brew_Buck · Post #100 » by **UWM_Brew_Buck** » Fri Mar 9, 2012 1:03 am

Hope for the best prepare for the worst.