trwi7 wrote:You really don't want to start this with me
No, I'm sure I don't.
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
trwi7 wrote:You really don't want to start this with me
Ayt wrote:trwi7 wrote:Gotta love fans of other teams coming over here asking what we would want for a player and them getting mad when what we want isn't what they want to give up.
In fairness, it is pretty **** stupid for people to be posting trades including Horford. You then had cinematographer posting a trade for Sanders that looked similar to something like Shaq to Miami.
parson wrote:Ayt wrote:trwi7 wrote:Gotta love fans of other teams coming over here asking what we would want for a player and them getting mad when what we want isn't what they want to give up.
In fairness, it is pretty **** stupid for people to be posting trades including Horford. You then had cinematographer posting a trade for Sanders that looked similar to something like Shaq to Miami.
I understand I'm a guest and that folks want the moon for their players. I'm sure I overvalue my team's players, as well. I'm just looking for an idea of Sanders' value. Like an Olympic judge, I'll throw out the high and low scores and average out the rest.
Ayt wrote:trwi7 wrote:Gotta love fans of other teams coming over here asking what we would want for a player and them getting mad when what we want isn't what they want to give up.
In fairness, it is pretty **** stupid for people to be posting trades including Horford. You then had cinematographer posting a trade for Sanders that looked similar to something like Shaq to Miami.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
parson wrote:Ayt wrote:trwi7 wrote:Gotta love fans of other teams coming over here asking what we would want for a player and them getting mad when what we want isn't what they want to give up.
In fairness, it is pretty **** stupid for people to be posting trades including Horford. You then had cinematographer posting a trade for Sanders that looked similar to something like Shaq to Miami.
I understand I'm a guest and that folks want the moon for their players. I'm sure I overvalue my team's players, as well. I'm just looking for an idea of Sanders' value. Like an Olympic judge, I'll throw out the high and low scores and average out the rest.
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
parson wrote:82 thousand posts and a "Certified Bucks Hater," yet I'm the one who's angry? Glad I came along to make you feel better.
(But seriously for a minute, how'd you trick the RealGM post counter so badly that it credits you with 82,000+? Do you write code?)
Ayt wrote:In fairness, it is pretty **** stupid for people to be posting trades including Horford. You then had cinematographer posting a trade for Sanders that looked similar to something like Shaq to Miami.
randy84 wrote:Larry Sanders is not a superstar.
Only chance for the Bucks to get a superstar is through the draft.
This draft has a lot of superstar potential.
More high draft picks adds to the chances of getting a superstar.
The Nets are awful this year and may get a high pick in a great draft.
I would trade Sanders for Atlanta's first which may end up being the Net's first to increase the Bucks' chances of getting a superstar.
However, I think you would have to get another team involved as the salaries would not work.
Ayt wrote:In fairness, it is pretty **** stupid for people to be posting trades including Horford.
paulpressey25 wrote:Ayt wrote:In fairness, it is pretty **** stupid for people to be posting trades including Horford.
Why?
Horford turns 28 next year. If this torn pec can't be solved quickly, he's out for the year. And that makes two out of the last three seasons he's missed based on torn pecs.
If I were Atlanta and wanted to do a long-term rebuild, I'd be considering dealing him if I get Larry back plus some other good assets.
Ruzious wrote:randy84 wrote:Larry Sanders is not a superstar.
Only chance for the Bucks to get a superstar is through the draft.
This draft has a lot of superstar potential.
More high draft picks adds to the chances of getting a superstar.
The Nets are awful this year and may get a high pick in a great draft.
I would trade Sanders for Atlanta's first which may end up being the Net's first to increase the Bucks' chances of getting a superstar.
However, I think you would have to get another team involved as the salaries would not work.
How about thinking of other ways to get that pick - since the CBA makes trading Sanders extremely difficult?
What about Henson? Stat guys are raving about him. His PER is over 20, and he has impressive efficiency stats - and stats are more and more running how GM's make moves. And the fact that he's still on his rookie contract for 2 more full seasons makes him a lot more valuable than the average fan would think. Combine him with super-bargain Khris Middleton, and you have a package that the new breed of GMs salivate over. And maybe that's enough to get Atl's pick? Consider Henson would be a real nice fit with Horford next season. Henson and Middleton for John Jenkins fits in the trade checker.
I've always liked Henson as a player but wonder if he's strong enough to hold up against the better teams.
Ruzious wrote:How about thinking of other ways to get that pick - since the CBA makes trading Sanders extremely difficult?
What about Henson? Stat guys are raving about him. His PER is over 20, and he has impressive efficiency stats - and stats are more and more running how GM's make moves. And the fact that he's still on his rookie contract for 2 more full seasons makes him a lot more valuable than the average fan would think. Combine him with super-bargain Khris Middleton, and you have a package that the new breed of GMs salivate over. And maybe that's enough to get Atl's pick? Consider Henson would be a real nice fit with Horford next season. Henson and Middleton for John Jenkins fits in the trade checker.
I've always liked Henson as a player but wonder if he's strong enough to hold up against the better teams.
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
StikWitEM wrote:Ruzious wrote:How about thinking of other ways to get that pick - since the CBA makes trading Sanders extremely difficult?
What about Henson? Stat guys are raving about him. His PER is over 20, and he has impressive efficiency stats - and stats are more and more running how GM's make moves. And the fact that he's still on his rookie contract for 2 more full seasons makes him a lot more valuable than the average fan would think. Combine him with super-bargain Khris Middleton, and you have a package that the new breed of GMs salivate over. And maybe that's enough to get Atl's pick? Consider Henson would be a real nice fit with Horford next season. Henson and Middleton for John Jenkins fits in the trade checker.
I've always liked Henson as a player but wonder if he's strong enough to hold up against the better teams.
That pick better be in the top 6 then for me to move both those guys. And Schroder has to come back as well. I think both Henson and Middleton are guys you can build around, so if I'm trading them both, I need a good haul coming back, worth trading for. I'd personally rather keep Henson over Sanders if I had to decide between the two, but for the sake of the conversation I would do this deal...
Henson + Middleton for Top 6 pick + Schroder + Jenkins
Draft Parker and Embiid or Randle
Schroder
Antetokounmpo
Parker
Sanders/Randle
Embiid/Sanders
Ruzious wrote:StikWitEM wrote:Ruzious wrote:How about thinking of other ways to get that pick - since the CBA makes trading Sanders extremely difficult?
What about Henson? Stat guys are raving about him. His PER is over 20, and he has impressive efficiency stats - and stats are more and more running how GM's make moves. And the fact that he's still on his rookie contract for 2 more full seasons makes him a lot more valuable than the average fan would think. Combine him with super-bargain Khris Middleton, and you have a package that the new breed of GMs salivate over. And maybe that's enough to get Atl's pick? Consider Henson would be a real nice fit with Horford next season. Henson and Middleton for John Jenkins fits in the trade checker.
I've always liked Henson as a player but wonder if he's strong enough to hold up against the better teams.
That pick better be in the top 6 then for me to move both those guys. And Schroder has to come back as well. I think both Henson and Middleton are guys you can build around, so if I'm trading them both, I need a good haul coming back, worth trading for. I'd personally rather keep Henson over Sanders if I had to decide between the two, but for the sake of the conversation I would do this deal...
Henson + Middleton for Top 6 pick + Schroder + Jenkins
Draft Parker and Embiid or Randle
Schroder
Antetokounmpo
Parker
Sanders/Randle
Embiid/Sanders
Ok, let's put Schroder in the deal. I was trying not to be greedy, but I probably over-compensated the other way. I'll agree with you and Chuck on this. And if need be, do we agree to include Wolters?
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?